Cargando…

Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer

OBJECTIVES: Measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is used in risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate performance characteristic of five different Lp(a) assays using the cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzer. DESIGN AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyness, Sara P., Genzen, Jonathan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00218
_version_ 1783680617325527040
author Wyness, Sara P.
Genzen, Jonathan R.
author_facet Wyness, Sara P.
Genzen, Jonathan R.
author_sort Wyness, Sara P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is used in risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate performance characteristic of five different Lp(a) assays using the cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Lp(a) was measured using five Lp(a) assays (Diazyme, Kamiya, MedTest, Randox, and Roche) configured to mg/dL units. Assays from Diazyme and Kamiya were also configured using nmol/L units in separate experiments. Studies included sensitivity, imprecision, linearity, method comparison, and evaluation of healthy subjects. Imprecision (intra-day, 20 replicates; inter-day, duplicates twice daily for five days) and linearity were evaluated using patient pools. Linearity assessed a minimum of five patient splits spanning the analytical measurement range (AMR). Method comparison used 80 residual serum samples. Specimens from 120 self-reported healthy subjects (61 females / 59 males) were also tested. Method comparison for two assays in nmol/L units was conducted using 96 residual serum samples. RESULTS: Assay sensitivities met all manufacturer claims. Imprecision studies demonstrated %CVs ranging from 2.5 to 5.2% for the low pool (average concentration from 7.3 to 12.4 ​mg/dL); high pool %CVs ranged from 0.8 to 3.0% (average concentrations from 31.5–50.2 ​mg/dL). Linearity was confirmed for all assays. Variation in accuracy was observed when comparing results to an all method average. Lp(a) results were higher in females versus males in self-reported healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: All assays performed according to manufacturer described performance characteristics, although differences were observed across Lp(a) assays tested when compared to an all method average.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8056269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80562692021-04-23 Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer Wyness, Sara P. Genzen, Jonathan R. Pract Lab Med Research Article OBJECTIVES: Measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is used in risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate performance characteristic of five different Lp(a) assays using the cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Lp(a) was measured using five Lp(a) assays (Diazyme, Kamiya, MedTest, Randox, and Roche) configured to mg/dL units. Assays from Diazyme and Kamiya were also configured using nmol/L units in separate experiments. Studies included sensitivity, imprecision, linearity, method comparison, and evaluation of healthy subjects. Imprecision (intra-day, 20 replicates; inter-day, duplicates twice daily for five days) and linearity were evaluated using patient pools. Linearity assessed a minimum of five patient splits spanning the analytical measurement range (AMR). Method comparison used 80 residual serum samples. Specimens from 120 self-reported healthy subjects (61 females / 59 males) were also tested. Method comparison for two assays in nmol/L units was conducted using 96 residual serum samples. RESULTS: Assay sensitivities met all manufacturer claims. Imprecision studies demonstrated %CVs ranging from 2.5 to 5.2% for the low pool (average concentration from 7.3 to 12.4 ​mg/dL); high pool %CVs ranged from 0.8 to 3.0% (average concentrations from 31.5–50.2 ​mg/dL). Linearity was confirmed for all assays. Variation in accuracy was observed when comparing results to an all method average. Lp(a) results were higher in females versus males in self-reported healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: All assays performed according to manufacturer described performance characteristics, although differences were observed across Lp(a) assays tested when compared to an all method average. Elsevier 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8056269/ /pubmed/33898688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00218 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Wyness, Sara P.
Genzen, Jonathan R.
Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
title Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
title_full Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
title_short Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
title_sort performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00218
work_keys_str_mv AT wynesssarap performanceevaluationoffivelipoproteinaimmunoassaysontherochecobasc501chemistryanalyzer
AT genzenjonathanr performanceevaluationoffivelipoproteinaimmunoassaysontherochecobasc501chemistryanalyzer