Cargando…
Long-term results of the custom- made hip endoprostheses Evolution K® and Adaptiva®: A prospective cohort study
The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K(®) and Adaptiva(®). Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy(®) bone densitometer) with a long-term...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907614 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2021.9014 |
Sumario: | The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K(®) and Adaptiva(®). Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy(®) bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K(®)) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva(®)) in 41 patients. Evolution- K(®) had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva(®) had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K(®): -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva(®): -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva(®) yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K(®) with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of “stress shielding”. Here, the Adaptiva(®) achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K(®). |
---|