Cargando…

Long-term results of the custom- made hip endoprostheses Evolution K® and Adaptiva®: A prospective cohort study

The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K(®) and Adaptiva(®). Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy(®) bone densitometer) with a long-term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axt, Steffen, Kirschniak, Andreas, Axt, Lena, Braun, Manuel, Beltzer, Christian, Leichtle, Carmen, Leichtle, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907614
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2021.9014
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K(®) and Adaptiva(®). Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy(®) bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K(®)) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva(®)) in 41 patients. Evolution- K(®) had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva(®) had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K(®): -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva(®): -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva(®) yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K(®) with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of “stress shielding”. Here, the Adaptiva(®) achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K(®).