Cargando…

Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be used in cancer care to monitor patients’ disease-related symptoms and functional status. However, successful implementation of such instruments is only possible if clinical staff are convinced of the clinical benefits. It is therefore crucial to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sibert, Nora Tabea, Kowalski, Christoph, Pfaff, Holger, Wesselmann, Simone, Breidenbach, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z
_version_ 1783680699487748096
author Sibert, Nora Tabea
Kowalski, Christoph
Pfaff, Holger
Wesselmann, Simone
Breidenbach, Clara
author_facet Sibert, Nora Tabea
Kowalski, Christoph
Pfaff, Holger
Wesselmann, Simone
Breidenbach, Clara
author_sort Sibert, Nora Tabea
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be used in cancer care to monitor patients’ disease-related symptoms and functional status. However, successful implementation of such instruments is only possible if clinical staff are convinced of the clinical benefits. It is therefore crucial to investigate the attitudes of clinical staff to PROs in routine cancer care. METHODS: Semi-structured, guideline-based interviews were held with 12 clinicians working in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany who are taking part in an observational study on PROs (five surgeons, two oncologists, one psycho-oncologist, two oncological care nurses, one stoma therapist, and one physician assistant) in order to investigate firstly, how clinicians describe PRO instruments (“wording”); and secondly, the clinicians’ general attitude toward PROs. A qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz was performed. RESULTS: The wording used to describe PROs was not consistent. Statements on attitudes toward PROs were very heterogeneous and were therefore categorized into “(rather) positive” and “(rather) negative.” The principal advantages of PROs mentioned by participants included broader, structured knowledge about patients and treatment, as well as relevance for patients. Subcategories for (rather) negative attitudes included statements expressing doubts about the questionnaires and “no need for PROs.” DISCUSSION: The clinicians participating mainly expressed fairly positive attitudes toward PROs. However, they had little knowledge about PROs in general and the interviews therefore mainly reflect their expectations and assumptions about them. These initial impressions may be regarded as providing a basis for future implementation strategies and for training of clinicians on how to use PROs in routine cancer care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8056693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80566932021-04-21 Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews Sibert, Nora Tabea Kowalski, Christoph Pfaff, Holger Wesselmann, Simone Breidenbach, Clara BMC Health Serv Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be used in cancer care to monitor patients’ disease-related symptoms and functional status. However, successful implementation of such instruments is only possible if clinical staff are convinced of the clinical benefits. It is therefore crucial to investigate the attitudes of clinical staff to PROs in routine cancer care. METHODS: Semi-structured, guideline-based interviews were held with 12 clinicians working in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany who are taking part in an observational study on PROs (five surgeons, two oncologists, one psycho-oncologist, two oncological care nurses, one stoma therapist, and one physician assistant) in order to investigate firstly, how clinicians describe PRO instruments (“wording”); and secondly, the clinicians’ general attitude toward PROs. A qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz was performed. RESULTS: The wording used to describe PROs was not consistent. Statements on attitudes toward PROs were very heterogeneous and were therefore categorized into “(rather) positive” and “(rather) negative.” The principal advantages of PROs mentioned by participants included broader, structured knowledge about patients and treatment, as well as relevance for patients. Subcategories for (rather) negative attitudes included statements expressing doubts about the questionnaires and “no need for PROs.” DISCUSSION: The clinicians participating mainly expressed fairly positive attitudes toward PROs. However, they had little knowledge about PROs in general and the interviews therefore mainly reflect their expectations and assumptions about them. These initial impressions may be regarded as providing a basis for future implementation strategies and for training of clinicians on how to use PROs in routine cancer care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z. BioMed Central 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8056693/ /pubmed/33879141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sibert, Nora Tabea
Kowalski, Christoph
Pfaff, Holger
Wesselmann, Simone
Breidenbach, Clara
Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
title Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
title_full Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
title_fullStr Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
title_short Clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
title_sort clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care – insights from qualitative interviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sibertnoratabea cliniciansknowledgeandattitudestowardspatientreportedoutcomesincolorectalcancercareinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT kowalskichristoph cliniciansknowledgeandattitudestowardspatientreportedoutcomesincolorectalcancercareinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT pfaffholger cliniciansknowledgeandattitudestowardspatientreportedoutcomesincolorectalcancercareinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT wesselmannsimone cliniciansknowledgeandattitudestowardspatientreportedoutcomesincolorectalcancercareinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT breidenbachclara cliniciansknowledgeandattitudestowardspatientreportedoutcomesincolorectalcancercareinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews