Cargando…

Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between rectal–vaginal pressure and symptomatic rectocele in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHOD: Patients with posterior vaginal prolapse staged III or IV in accordance with the POP Quantitation classification method who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Cheng, Tan, Man, Geng, Jing, Tang, Jun, Yang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01304-6
_version_ 1783680705003257856
author Tan, Cheng
Tan, Man
Geng, Jing
Tang, Jun
Yang, Xin
author_facet Tan, Cheng
Tan, Man
Geng, Jing
Tang, Jun
Yang, Xin
author_sort Tan, Cheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between rectal–vaginal pressure and symptomatic rectocele in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHOD: Patients with posterior vaginal prolapse staged III or IV in accordance with the POP Quantitation classification method who were scheduled for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in the years 2016–2019 were included in the study. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound, and obstructed defecation (OD) was diagnosed in accordance with the Roma IV diagnostic criteria. Both rectal and vaginal pressure were measured using peritron manometers at maximum Vasalva. To ensure stability, the test was performed three times with each patient. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were enrolled in this study. True rectocele was diagnosed in 68 patients at a main rectal ampulla depth of 19 mm. Furthermore, 36 patients were diagnosed with OD. Symptomatic rectocele was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.01), a higher OD symptom score (p < 0.001), and a lower grade of apical prolapse (p < 0.001). The rectal–vaginal pressure gradient was higher in patients with symptomatic rectocele (37.4 ± 11.7 cm H(2)O) compared with patients with asymptomatic rectocele (16.9 ± 8.4 cm H(2)O, p < 0.001), and patients without rectocele (17.1 ± 9.2 cm H(2)O, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rectal–vaginal pressure gradient was found to be a risk factor for symptomatic rectocele in patients with POP. A rectal–vaginal pressure gradient of > 27.5 cm H(2)O was suggested as the cut-off point of the elevated pressure gradient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8056717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80567172021-04-21 Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele Tan, Cheng Tan, Man Geng, Jing Tang, Jun Yang, Xin BMC Womens Health Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between rectal–vaginal pressure and symptomatic rectocele in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHOD: Patients with posterior vaginal prolapse staged III or IV in accordance with the POP Quantitation classification method who were scheduled for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in the years 2016–2019 were included in the study. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound, and obstructed defecation (OD) was diagnosed in accordance with the Roma IV diagnostic criteria. Both rectal and vaginal pressure were measured using peritron manometers at maximum Vasalva. To ensure stability, the test was performed three times with each patient. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were enrolled in this study. True rectocele was diagnosed in 68 patients at a main rectal ampulla depth of 19 mm. Furthermore, 36 patients were diagnosed with OD. Symptomatic rectocele was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.01), a higher OD symptom score (p < 0.001), and a lower grade of apical prolapse (p < 0.001). The rectal–vaginal pressure gradient was higher in patients with symptomatic rectocele (37.4 ± 11.7 cm H(2)O) compared with patients with asymptomatic rectocele (16.9 ± 8.4 cm H(2)O, p < 0.001), and patients without rectocele (17.1 ± 9.2 cm H(2)O, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rectal–vaginal pressure gradient was found to be a risk factor for symptomatic rectocele in patients with POP. A rectal–vaginal pressure gradient of > 27.5 cm H(2)O was suggested as the cut-off point of the elevated pressure gradient. BioMed Central 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8056717/ /pubmed/33879140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01304-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tan, Cheng
Tan, Man
Geng, Jing
Tang, Jun
Yang, Xin
Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
title Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
title_full Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
title_fullStr Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
title_full_unstemmed Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
title_short Rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
title_sort rectal–vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01304-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tancheng rectalvaginalpressuregradientinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapseandsymptomaticrectocele
AT tanman rectalvaginalpressuregradientinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapseandsymptomaticrectocele
AT gengjing rectalvaginalpressuregradientinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapseandsymptomaticrectocele
AT tangjun rectalvaginalpressuregradientinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapseandsymptomaticrectocele
AT yangxin rectalvaginalpressuregradientinpatientswithpelvicorganprolapseandsymptomaticrectocele