Cargando…
The performance of iPad-based noise-field perimeter versus Humphrey Field Analyser in detecting glaucomatous visual field loss
BACKGROUND: To conduct a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of visual field fast (VFF), a free iPad-based noise-field perimeter, in detecting glaucomatous scotomas versus the clinical-standard Humphrey visual field (HVF) test. VFF confronts subjects with a screen of flickering stimulus, allow...
Autores principales: | Ding, Jianbin, Tecson, Ivan C., Ang, Bryan C. H., Chiew, Wenqi, Chua, Chunhau, Yip, Leonard W. L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01541-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of the TEMPO Binocular Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer
por: Nishida, Takashi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of the TEMPO binocular perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer
por: Nishida, Takashi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad
por: Chia, Mark A, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo(®)) and Humphrey Field Analyzer
por: Kimura, Tairo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Visual field examination using a video projector: comparison with Humphrey perimeter
por: Brouzas, Dimitrios, et al.
Publicado: (2014)