Cargando…

Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures

Somatic mutation signatures are an informative facet of cancer aetiology, however they are rarely useful for predicting patient outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of a panel of 142 mutation-signature–associated metrics (P142) for predicting cancer progression in patients from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamrot, Jared, Hall, Nathan E., Lindley, Robyn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889305
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27934
_version_ 1783680805166383104
author Mamrot, Jared
Hall, Nathan E.
Lindley, Robyn A.
author_facet Mamrot, Jared
Hall, Nathan E.
Lindley, Robyn A.
author_sort Mamrot, Jared
collection PubMed
description Somatic mutation signatures are an informative facet of cancer aetiology, however they are rarely useful for predicting patient outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of a panel of 142 mutation-signature–associated metrics (P142) for predicting cancer progression in patients from a ‘TCGA PanCancer Atlas’ cohort. The P142 metrics are comprised of AID/APOBEC and ADAR deaminase associated SNVs analyzed for codon context, strand bias, and transitions/transversions. TCGA tumor-normal mutation data was obtained for 10,437 patients, representing 31 of the most prevalent forms of cancer. Stratified random sampling was used to split patients into training, tuning and validation cohorts for each cancer type. Cancer specific machine learning (XGBoost) models were built using the output from the P142 panel to predict patient Progression Free Survival (PFS) status as either “High PFS” or “Low PFS”. Predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the validation cohort. Models accurately predicted PFS status for several cancer types, including adrenocortical carcinoma, glioma, mesothelioma, and sarcoma. In conclusion, the P142 panel of metrics successfully predicted cancer progression status in patients with some, but not all cancer types analyzed. These results pave the way for future studies on cancer progression associated signatures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80572772021-04-21 Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures Mamrot, Jared Hall, Nathan E. Lindley, Robyn A. Oncotarget Research Paper Somatic mutation signatures are an informative facet of cancer aetiology, however they are rarely useful for predicting patient outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of a panel of 142 mutation-signature–associated metrics (P142) for predicting cancer progression in patients from a ‘TCGA PanCancer Atlas’ cohort. The P142 metrics are comprised of AID/APOBEC and ADAR deaminase associated SNVs analyzed for codon context, strand bias, and transitions/transversions. TCGA tumor-normal mutation data was obtained for 10,437 patients, representing 31 of the most prevalent forms of cancer. Stratified random sampling was used to split patients into training, tuning and validation cohorts for each cancer type. Cancer specific machine learning (XGBoost) models were built using the output from the P142 panel to predict patient Progression Free Survival (PFS) status as either “High PFS” or “Low PFS”. Predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the validation cohort. Models accurately predicted PFS status for several cancer types, including adrenocortical carcinoma, glioma, mesothelioma, and sarcoma. In conclusion, the P142 panel of metrics successfully predicted cancer progression status in patients with some, but not all cancer types analyzed. These results pave the way for future studies on cancer progression associated signatures. Impact Journals LLC 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8057277/ /pubmed/33889305 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27934 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Mamrot et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mamrot, Jared
Hall, Nathan E.
Lindley, Robyn A.
Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
title Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
title_full Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
title_fullStr Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
title_full_unstemmed Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
title_short Predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
title_sort predicting clinical outcomes using cancer progression associated signatures
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889305
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27934
work_keys_str_mv AT mamrotjared predictingclinicaloutcomesusingcancerprogressionassociatedsignatures
AT hallnathane predictingclinicaloutcomesusingcancerprogressionassociatedsignatures
AT lindleyrobyna predictingclinicaloutcomesusingcancerprogressionassociatedsignatures