Cargando…

Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics

INTRODUCTION: Many institutions are attempting to implement patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Because PROs often change clinical workflows significantly for patients and providers, implementation choices can have major impact. While various implementation guides exist, a stepwise list of deci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, Therese A., Anderson, Brigitte, Bian, Jiang, Boyd, Andrew D., Burton, Shirley V., Davis, Kristina, Guo, Yi, Harris, Bhrandon A., Hynes, Kelly, Kochendorfer, Karl M., Liebovitz, David, Martin, Kayla, Modave, François, Moses, John, Soulakis, Nicholas D., Weinbrenner, Donald, White, Sonya H., Rothrock, Nan E., Valenta, Annette L., Starren, Justin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.37
_version_ 1783680824003002368
author Nelson, Therese A.
Anderson, Brigitte
Bian, Jiang
Boyd, Andrew D.
Burton, Shirley V.
Davis, Kristina
Guo, Yi
Harris, Bhrandon A.
Hynes, Kelly
Kochendorfer, Karl M.
Liebovitz, David
Martin, Kayla
Modave, François
Moses, John
Soulakis, Nicholas D.
Weinbrenner, Donald
White, Sonya H.
Rothrock, Nan E.
Valenta, Annette L.
Starren, Justin B.
author_facet Nelson, Therese A.
Anderson, Brigitte
Bian, Jiang
Boyd, Andrew D.
Burton, Shirley V.
Davis, Kristina
Guo, Yi
Harris, Bhrandon A.
Hynes, Kelly
Kochendorfer, Karl M.
Liebovitz, David
Martin, Kayla
Modave, François
Moses, John
Soulakis, Nicholas D.
Weinbrenner, Donald
White, Sonya H.
Rothrock, Nan E.
Valenta, Annette L.
Starren, Justin B.
author_sort Nelson, Therese A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many institutions are attempting to implement patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Because PROs often change clinical workflows significantly for patients and providers, implementation choices can have major impact. While various implementation guides exist, a stepwise list of decision points covering the full implementation process and drawing explicitly on a sociotechnical conceptual framework does not exist. METHODS: To facilitate real-world implementation of PROs in electronic health records (EHRs) for use in clinical practice, members of the EHR Access to Seamless Integration of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Consortium developed structured PRO implementation planning tools. Each institution pilot tested the tools. Joint meetings led to the identification of critical sociotechnical success factors. RESULTS: Three tools were developed and tested: (1) a PRO Planning Guide summarizes the empirical knowledge and guidance about PRO implementation in routine clinical care; (2) a Decision Log allows decision tracking; and (3) an Implementation Plan Template simplifies creation of a sharable implementation plan. Seven lessons learned during implementation underscore the iterative nature of planning and the importance of the clinician champion, as well as the need to understand aims, manage implementation barriers, minimize disruption, provide ample discussion time, and continuously engage key stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Highly structured planning tools, informed by a sociotechnical perspective, enabled the construction of clear, clinic-specific plans. By developing and testing three reusable tools (freely available for immediate use), our project addressed the need for consolidated guidance and created new materials for PRO implementation planning. We identified seven important lessons that, while common to technology implementation, are especially critical in PRO implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80573862021-05-03 Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics Nelson, Therese A. Anderson, Brigitte Bian, Jiang Boyd, Andrew D. Burton, Shirley V. Davis, Kristina Guo, Yi Harris, Bhrandon A. Hynes, Kelly Kochendorfer, Karl M. Liebovitz, David Martin, Kayla Modave, François Moses, John Soulakis, Nicholas D. Weinbrenner, Donald White, Sonya H. Rothrock, Nan E. Valenta, Annette L. Starren, Justin B. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Many institutions are attempting to implement patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Because PROs often change clinical workflows significantly for patients and providers, implementation choices can have major impact. While various implementation guides exist, a stepwise list of decision points covering the full implementation process and drawing explicitly on a sociotechnical conceptual framework does not exist. METHODS: To facilitate real-world implementation of PROs in electronic health records (EHRs) for use in clinical practice, members of the EHR Access to Seamless Integration of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Consortium developed structured PRO implementation planning tools. Each institution pilot tested the tools. Joint meetings led to the identification of critical sociotechnical success factors. RESULTS: Three tools were developed and tested: (1) a PRO Planning Guide summarizes the empirical knowledge and guidance about PRO implementation in routine clinical care; (2) a Decision Log allows decision tracking; and (3) an Implementation Plan Template simplifies creation of a sharable implementation plan. Seven lessons learned during implementation underscore the iterative nature of planning and the importance of the clinician champion, as well as the need to understand aims, manage implementation barriers, minimize disruption, provide ample discussion time, and continuously engage key stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Highly structured planning tools, informed by a sociotechnical perspective, enabled the construction of clear, clinic-specific plans. By developing and testing three reusable tools (freely available for immediate use), our project addressed the need for consolidated guidance and created new materials for PRO implementation planning. We identified seven important lessons that, while common to technology implementation, are especially critical in PRO implementation. Cambridge University Press 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8057386/ /pubmed/33948226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.37 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nelson, Therese A.
Anderson, Brigitte
Bian, Jiang
Boyd, Andrew D.
Burton, Shirley V.
Davis, Kristina
Guo, Yi
Harris, Bhrandon A.
Hynes, Kelly
Kochendorfer, Karl M.
Liebovitz, David
Martin, Kayla
Modave, François
Moses, John
Soulakis, Nicholas D.
Weinbrenner, Donald
White, Sonya H.
Rothrock, Nan E.
Valenta, Annette L.
Starren, Justin B.
Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
title Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
title_full Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
title_fullStr Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
title_full_unstemmed Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
title_short Planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: Development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
title_sort planning for patient-reported outcome implementation: development of decision tools and practical experience across four clinics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.37
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsontheresea planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT andersonbrigitte planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT bianjiang planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT boydandrewd planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT burtonshirleyv planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT daviskristina planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT guoyi planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT harrisbhrandona planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT hyneskelly planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT kochendorferkarlm planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT liebovitzdavid planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT martinkayla planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT modavefrancois planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT mosesjohn planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT soulakisnicholasd planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT weinbrennerdonald planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT whitesonyah planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT rothrocknane planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT valentaannettel planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics
AT starrenjustinb planningforpatientreportedoutcomeimplementationdevelopmentofdecisiontoolsandpracticalexperienceacrossfourclinics