Cargando…
Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, many studies have been conducted on the electrical properties of acupuncture points (acupoints), especially their bio-resistance characteristics. Results of such studies have been inconclusive due to factors such as sweat gland density and compounding factors of applying...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638807 |
_version_ | 1783680913247305728 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jingjing Yu, Renhuan Zhao, Enlu Zhou, Quan Gai, Shuping |
author_facet | Zhang, Jingjing Yu, Renhuan Zhao, Enlu Zhou, Quan Gai, Shuping |
author_sort | Zhang, Jingjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, many studies have been conducted on the electrical properties of acupuncture points (acupoints), especially their bio-resistance characteristics. Results of such studies have been inconclusive due to factors such as sweat gland density and compounding factors of applying electrical stimulation. In this study, a power spectrum instrument was used to assess the power spectrum and power of acupoints and nonacupoints without electrical stimulation. Using such instrumentation, specificity of electrical signals of acupoints was also explored. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects (29 females, 7 males) participated in the study. Stainless steel acupuncture needles (diameter 0.35 mm; length 50 mm) were used. Five acupoints were tested: ST 36, SP 6, GB 39, GB 37, and K I9. Four control sites 0.5–1.0 cm adjacent to each acupoint were chosen. After needle insertion into the acupoint and control sites, the needles were attached to the power spectrum instrument to acquire any electrical signals. Acquire signals were analyzed using self-written software. RESULTS: Power spectrum difference between acupoint and nonacupoint signals was 0–2 Hz. Results of t-test or signed rank sum test (α = 0.05) found that electrical signals between acupoints and nonacupoints were markedly different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupoint bioelectricity signals are higher than adjacent nonacupoints. The most significant difference is distributed between 0 Hz and 2 Hz. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8057873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80578732021-05-04 Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal Zhang, Jingjing Yu, Renhuan Zhao, Enlu Zhou, Quan Gai, Shuping Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, many studies have been conducted on the electrical properties of acupuncture points (acupoints), especially their bio-resistance characteristics. Results of such studies have been inconclusive due to factors such as sweat gland density and compounding factors of applying electrical stimulation. In this study, a power spectrum instrument was used to assess the power spectrum and power of acupoints and nonacupoints without electrical stimulation. Using such instrumentation, specificity of electrical signals of acupoints was also explored. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects (29 females, 7 males) participated in the study. Stainless steel acupuncture needles (diameter 0.35 mm; length 50 mm) were used. Five acupoints were tested: ST 36, SP 6, GB 39, GB 37, and K I9. Four control sites 0.5–1.0 cm adjacent to each acupoint were chosen. After needle insertion into the acupoint and control sites, the needles were attached to the power spectrum instrument to acquire any electrical signals. Acquire signals were analyzed using self-written software. RESULTS: Power spectrum difference between acupoint and nonacupoint signals was 0–2 Hz. Results of t-test or signed rank sum test (α = 0.05) found that electrical signals between acupoints and nonacupoints were markedly different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupoint bioelectricity signals are higher than adjacent nonacupoints. The most significant difference is distributed between 0 Hz and 2 Hz. Hindawi 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8057873/ /pubmed/33953785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638807 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jingjing Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Jingjing Yu, Renhuan Zhao, Enlu Zhou, Quan Gai, Shuping Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal |
title | Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal |
title_full | Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal |
title_fullStr | Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal |
title_full_unstemmed | Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal |
title_short | Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal |
title_sort | power spectrum features of acupoint bioelectricity signal |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjingjing powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal AT yurenhuan powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal AT zhaoenlu powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal AT zhouquan powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal AT gaishuping powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal |