Cargando…

Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal

BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, many studies have been conducted on the electrical properties of acupuncture points (acupoints), especially their bio-resistance characteristics. Results of such studies have been inconclusive due to factors such as sweat gland density and compounding factors of applying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jingjing, Yu, Renhuan, Zhao, Enlu, Zhou, Quan, Gai, Shuping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638807
_version_ 1783680913247305728
author Zhang, Jingjing
Yu, Renhuan
Zhao, Enlu
Zhou, Quan
Gai, Shuping
author_facet Zhang, Jingjing
Yu, Renhuan
Zhao, Enlu
Zhou, Quan
Gai, Shuping
author_sort Zhang, Jingjing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, many studies have been conducted on the electrical properties of acupuncture points (acupoints), especially their bio-resistance characteristics. Results of such studies have been inconclusive due to factors such as sweat gland density and compounding factors of applying electrical stimulation. In this study, a power spectrum instrument was used to assess the power spectrum and power of acupoints and nonacupoints without electrical stimulation. Using such instrumentation, specificity of electrical signals of acupoints was also explored. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects (29 females, 7 males) participated in the study. Stainless steel acupuncture needles (diameter 0.35 mm; length 50 mm) were used. Five acupoints were tested: ST 36, SP 6, GB 39, GB 37, and K I9. Four control sites 0.5–1.0 cm adjacent to each acupoint were chosen. After needle insertion into the acupoint and control sites, the needles were attached to the power spectrum instrument to acquire any electrical signals. Acquire signals were analyzed using self-written software. RESULTS: Power spectrum difference between acupoint and nonacupoint signals was 0–2 Hz. Results of t-test or signed rank sum test (α = 0.05) found that electrical signals between acupoints and nonacupoints were markedly different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupoint bioelectricity signals are higher than adjacent nonacupoints. The most significant difference is distributed between 0 Hz and 2 Hz.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80578732021-05-04 Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal Zhang, Jingjing Yu, Renhuan Zhao, Enlu Zhou, Quan Gai, Shuping Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s, many studies have been conducted on the electrical properties of acupuncture points (acupoints), especially their bio-resistance characteristics. Results of such studies have been inconclusive due to factors such as sweat gland density and compounding factors of applying electrical stimulation. In this study, a power spectrum instrument was used to assess the power spectrum and power of acupoints and nonacupoints without electrical stimulation. Using such instrumentation, specificity of electrical signals of acupoints was also explored. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects (29 females, 7 males) participated in the study. Stainless steel acupuncture needles (diameter 0.35 mm; length 50 mm) were used. Five acupoints were tested: ST 36, SP 6, GB 39, GB 37, and K I9. Four control sites 0.5–1.0 cm adjacent to each acupoint were chosen. After needle insertion into the acupoint and control sites, the needles were attached to the power spectrum instrument to acquire any electrical signals. Acquire signals were analyzed using self-written software. RESULTS: Power spectrum difference between acupoint and nonacupoint signals was 0–2 Hz. Results of t-test or signed rank sum test (α = 0.05) found that electrical signals between acupoints and nonacupoints were markedly different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acupoint bioelectricity signals are higher than adjacent nonacupoints. The most significant difference is distributed between 0 Hz and 2 Hz. Hindawi 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8057873/ /pubmed/33953785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638807 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jingjing Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Jingjing
Yu, Renhuan
Zhao, Enlu
Zhou, Quan
Gai, Shuping
Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
title Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
title_full Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
title_fullStr Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
title_full_unstemmed Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
title_short Power Spectrum Features of Acupoint Bioelectricity Signal
title_sort power spectrum features of acupoint bioelectricity signal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638807
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjingjing powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal
AT yurenhuan powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal
AT zhaoenlu powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal
AT zhouquan powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal
AT gaishuping powerspectrumfeaturesofacupointbioelectricitysignal