Cargando…
A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
Titanium hypersensitivity is rare, but it may exist among patients who need dental implant treatment. It could contribute to mild or severe peri-implant tissue hypersensitivity reactions and affect patients' oral and general health according to some clinical reports. In extreme cases, it may le...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592934 |
_version_ | 1783680922204241920 |
---|---|
author | Alqahtani, Ali Robaian Gufran, Khalid Silva, Fred Rocha, Mateus Garcia Chang, Jia |
author_facet | Alqahtani, Ali Robaian Gufran, Khalid Silva, Fred Rocha, Mateus Garcia Chang, Jia |
author_sort | Alqahtani, Ali Robaian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Titanium hypersensitivity is rare, but it may exist among patients who need dental implant treatment. It could contribute to mild or severe peri-implant tissue hypersensitivity reactions and affect patients' oral and general health according to some clinical reports. In extreme cases, it may lead to implant failure or extraction. In this case report, a 64-year-old Caucasian female patient received a titanium implant placement on #5. Right after the implant placement, she reported the symptoms of pain, eczema, and slight extraoral swelling, along with significant burning sensation occurring intra- and extraorally. The symptoms were not released after the systemic intervention of antibiotics for six days. On retrieving her medical history, the patient reported a previous allergic reaction to jewelry-like earrings in her childhood. The diagnosis of titanium hypersensitivity was made based on the rapid onset of symptoms and her metal allergy history. Therefore, the dental implant was removed after diagnosis, and a bone allograft was used to preserve the alveolar bone volume. Immediately after implant extraction, the swelling and burning sensation were receded. A complete recovery was achieved three weeks later. The dimension of the alveolar ridge bone was found well maintained in 10 weeks follow-up visit. Conclusion. Rapid onset of peri-implant gingival swelling may indicate a hypersensitivity to titanium implant in the clinic. For patients with a history of allergy to jewelry, the hypersensitivity tests to titanium alloy such as patch test or lymphocyte transformation test should be recommended as part of the dental implant treatment plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8057912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80579122021-05-04 A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant Alqahtani, Ali Robaian Gufran, Khalid Silva, Fred Rocha, Mateus Garcia Chang, Jia Case Rep Dent Case Report Titanium hypersensitivity is rare, but it may exist among patients who need dental implant treatment. It could contribute to mild or severe peri-implant tissue hypersensitivity reactions and affect patients' oral and general health according to some clinical reports. In extreme cases, it may lead to implant failure or extraction. In this case report, a 64-year-old Caucasian female patient received a titanium implant placement on #5. Right after the implant placement, she reported the symptoms of pain, eczema, and slight extraoral swelling, along with significant burning sensation occurring intra- and extraorally. The symptoms were not released after the systemic intervention of antibiotics for six days. On retrieving her medical history, the patient reported a previous allergic reaction to jewelry-like earrings in her childhood. The diagnosis of titanium hypersensitivity was made based on the rapid onset of symptoms and her metal allergy history. Therefore, the dental implant was removed after diagnosis, and a bone allograft was used to preserve the alveolar bone volume. Immediately after implant extraction, the swelling and burning sensation were receded. A complete recovery was achieved three weeks later. The dimension of the alveolar ridge bone was found well maintained in 10 weeks follow-up visit. Conclusion. Rapid onset of peri-implant gingival swelling may indicate a hypersensitivity to titanium implant in the clinic. For patients with a history of allergy to jewelry, the hypersensitivity tests to titanium alloy such as patch test or lymphocyte transformation test should be recommended as part of the dental implant treatment plan. Hindawi 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8057912/ /pubmed/33953988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592934 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ali Robaian Alqahtani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Alqahtani, Ali Robaian Gufran, Khalid Silva, Fred Rocha, Mateus Garcia Chang, Jia A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant |
title | A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant |
title_full | A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant |
title_fullStr | A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant |
title_full_unstemmed | A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant |
title_short | A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant |
title_sort | clinical case report of a potential acute allergic reaction with titanium dental implant |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alqahtanialirobaian aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT gufrankhalid aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT silvafred aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT rochamateusgarcia aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT changjia aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT alqahtanialirobaian clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT gufrankhalid clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT silvafred clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT rochamateusgarcia clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant AT changjia clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant |