Cargando…

A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant

Titanium hypersensitivity is rare, but it may exist among patients who need dental implant treatment. It could contribute to mild or severe peri-implant tissue hypersensitivity reactions and affect patients' oral and general health according to some clinical reports. In extreme cases, it may le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqahtani, Ali Robaian, Gufran, Khalid, Silva, Fred, Rocha, Mateus Garcia, Chang, Jia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592934
_version_ 1783680922204241920
author Alqahtani, Ali Robaian
Gufran, Khalid
Silva, Fred
Rocha, Mateus Garcia
Chang, Jia
author_facet Alqahtani, Ali Robaian
Gufran, Khalid
Silva, Fred
Rocha, Mateus Garcia
Chang, Jia
author_sort Alqahtani, Ali Robaian
collection PubMed
description Titanium hypersensitivity is rare, but it may exist among patients who need dental implant treatment. It could contribute to mild or severe peri-implant tissue hypersensitivity reactions and affect patients' oral and general health according to some clinical reports. In extreme cases, it may lead to implant failure or extraction. In this case report, a 64-year-old Caucasian female patient received a titanium implant placement on #5. Right after the implant placement, she reported the symptoms of pain, eczema, and slight extraoral swelling, along with significant burning sensation occurring intra- and extraorally. The symptoms were not released after the systemic intervention of antibiotics for six days. On retrieving her medical history, the patient reported a previous allergic reaction to jewelry-like earrings in her childhood. The diagnosis of titanium hypersensitivity was made based on the rapid onset of symptoms and her metal allergy history. Therefore, the dental implant was removed after diagnosis, and a bone allograft was used to preserve the alveolar bone volume. Immediately after implant extraction, the swelling and burning sensation were receded. A complete recovery was achieved three weeks later. The dimension of the alveolar ridge bone was found well maintained in 10 weeks follow-up visit. Conclusion. Rapid onset of peri-implant gingival swelling may indicate a hypersensitivity to titanium implant in the clinic. For patients with a history of allergy to jewelry, the hypersensitivity tests to titanium alloy such as patch test or lymphocyte transformation test should be recommended as part of the dental implant treatment plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80579122021-05-04 A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant Alqahtani, Ali Robaian Gufran, Khalid Silva, Fred Rocha, Mateus Garcia Chang, Jia Case Rep Dent Case Report Titanium hypersensitivity is rare, but it may exist among patients who need dental implant treatment. It could contribute to mild or severe peri-implant tissue hypersensitivity reactions and affect patients' oral and general health according to some clinical reports. In extreme cases, it may lead to implant failure or extraction. In this case report, a 64-year-old Caucasian female patient received a titanium implant placement on #5. Right after the implant placement, she reported the symptoms of pain, eczema, and slight extraoral swelling, along with significant burning sensation occurring intra- and extraorally. The symptoms were not released after the systemic intervention of antibiotics for six days. On retrieving her medical history, the patient reported a previous allergic reaction to jewelry-like earrings in her childhood. The diagnosis of titanium hypersensitivity was made based on the rapid onset of symptoms and her metal allergy history. Therefore, the dental implant was removed after diagnosis, and a bone allograft was used to preserve the alveolar bone volume. Immediately after implant extraction, the swelling and burning sensation were receded. A complete recovery was achieved three weeks later. The dimension of the alveolar ridge bone was found well maintained in 10 weeks follow-up visit. Conclusion. Rapid onset of peri-implant gingival swelling may indicate a hypersensitivity to titanium implant in the clinic. For patients with a history of allergy to jewelry, the hypersensitivity tests to titanium alloy such as patch test or lymphocyte transformation test should be recommended as part of the dental implant treatment plan. Hindawi 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8057912/ /pubmed/33953988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592934 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ali Robaian Alqahtani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Alqahtani, Ali Robaian
Gufran, Khalid
Silva, Fred
Rocha, Mateus Garcia
Chang, Jia
A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
title A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
title_full A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
title_fullStr A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
title_full_unstemmed A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
title_short A Clinical Case Report of a Potential Acute Allergic Reaction with Titanium Dental Implant
title_sort clinical case report of a potential acute allergic reaction with titanium dental implant
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592934
work_keys_str_mv AT alqahtanialirobaian aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT gufrankhalid aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT silvafred aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT rochamateusgarcia aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT changjia aclinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT alqahtanialirobaian clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT gufrankhalid clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT silvafred clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT rochamateusgarcia clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant
AT changjia clinicalcasereportofapotentialacuteallergicreactionwithtitaniumdentalimplant