Cargando…

Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of open and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (ODP and RDP) for benign and low-grade malignant tumors. METHODS: The patients who underwent RDP and ODP for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors at our center were included....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weng, Yuanchi, Jin, Jiabin, Huo, Zhen, Shi, Yusheng, Jiang, Yu, Deng, Xiaxing, Peng, Chenghong, Shen, Baiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32458287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9
_version_ 1783680933178638336
author Weng, Yuanchi
Jin, Jiabin
Huo, Zhen
Shi, Yusheng
Jiang, Yu
Deng, Xiaxing
Peng, Chenghong
Shen, Baiyong
author_facet Weng, Yuanchi
Jin, Jiabin
Huo, Zhen
Shi, Yusheng
Jiang, Yu
Deng, Xiaxing
Peng, Chenghong
Shen, Baiyong
author_sort Weng, Yuanchi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of open and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (ODP and RDP) for benign and low-grade malignant tumors. METHODS: The patients who underwent RDP and ODP for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors at our center were included. After PSM at a 1:1 ratio, the perioperative variations in the two cohorts were compared. RESULTS: After 1:1 PSM, 219 cases of RDP and ODP were recorded. The RDP cohort showed advantages in the operative duration [120 (90–150) min vs 175 (130–210) min, P < 0.001], estimated blood loss [50 (30–175) ml vs 200 (100–300) ml, P < 0.001], spleen preservation rate (63.5% vs 26.5%, P < 0.001), infection rate (4.6% vs 12.3%, P = 0.006), and gastrointestinal function recovery [3 (2–4) vs. 3 (3–5), P = 0.019]. There were no significant differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. Multivariate analysis showed that RDP (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.36, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03, P = 0.033), tumor size (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.17–1.40, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 5.12; 95% CI 2.22–11.81, P < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation; RDP (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.17–0.43, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03, P = 0.022), elevated CA 19–9 level (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.02–6.39, P = 0.046), tumor size (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.29–1.61, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 4.48; 95% CI 1.69–11.85, P = 0.003), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation with the Kimura technique. CONCLUSION: RDP has advantages in the operative time, blood loss, spleen preservation, infection rate, and gastrointestinal function recovery over ODP in treating benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors. The robotic-assisted approach was an independent predictor of spleen preservation and use of the Kimura technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80579622021-05-05 Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study Weng, Yuanchi Jin, Jiabin Huo, Zhen Shi, Yusheng Jiang, Yu Deng, Xiaxing Peng, Chenghong Shen, Baiyong Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of open and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (ODP and RDP) for benign and low-grade malignant tumors. METHODS: The patients who underwent RDP and ODP for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors at our center were included. After PSM at a 1:1 ratio, the perioperative variations in the two cohorts were compared. RESULTS: After 1:1 PSM, 219 cases of RDP and ODP were recorded. The RDP cohort showed advantages in the operative duration [120 (90–150) min vs 175 (130–210) min, P < 0.001], estimated blood loss [50 (30–175) ml vs 200 (100–300) ml, P < 0.001], spleen preservation rate (63.5% vs 26.5%, P < 0.001), infection rate (4.6% vs 12.3%, P = 0.006), and gastrointestinal function recovery [3 (2–4) vs. 3 (3–5), P = 0.019]. There were no significant differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. Multivariate analysis showed that RDP (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16–0.36, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03, P = 0.033), tumor size (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.17–1.40, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 5.12; 95% CI 2.22–11.81, P < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation; RDP (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.17–0.43, P < 0.001), age (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03, P = 0.022), elevated CA 19–9 level (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.02–6.39, P = 0.046), tumor size (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.29–1.61, P < 0.001), pathological inflammatory neoplasm type (HR 4.48; 95% CI 1.69–11.85, P = 0.003), and estimated blood loss (HR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001–1.004, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of spleen preservation with the Kimura technique. CONCLUSION: RDP has advantages in the operative time, blood loss, spleen preservation, infection rate, and gastrointestinal function recovery over ODP in treating benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors. The robotic-assisted approach was an independent predictor of spleen preservation and use of the Kimura technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-08-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8057962/ /pubmed/32458287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Weng, Yuanchi
Jin, Jiabin
Huo, Zhen
Shi, Yusheng
Jiang, Yu
Deng, Xiaxing
Peng, Chenghong
Shen, Baiyong
Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
title Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
title_full Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
title_fullStr Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
title_short Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
title_sort robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32458287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wengyuanchi roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT jinjiabin roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT huozhen roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT shiyusheng roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT jiangyu roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT dengxiaxing roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT pengchenghong roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT shenbaiyong roboticassistedversusopendistalpancreatectomyforbenignandlowgrademalignantpancreatictumorsapropensityscorematchedstudy