Cargando…

Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography

PURPOSE: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers a valid alternative to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A possible radiation dose reduction with the use of CBCT in postoperative imaging of CIs is of great importance. Whether the visualization of Cochlear Implant (CI) electrodes in CBCT co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bevis, Nicholas, Effertz, Thomas, Beutner, Dirk, Gueldner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06198-y
_version_ 1783680940130697216
author Bevis, Nicholas
Effertz, Thomas
Beutner, Dirk
Gueldner, Christian
author_facet Bevis, Nicholas
Effertz, Thomas
Beutner, Dirk
Gueldner, Christian
author_sort Bevis, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers a valid alternative to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A possible radiation dose reduction with the use of CBCT in postoperative imaging of CIs is of great importance. Whether the visualization of Cochlear Implant (CI) electrodes in CBCT correlates with the radiation dose applied was investigated in this study. METHODS: We compared the visualization quality of Contour Advance CIs to Straight CIs from Cochlear using CBCT with varying tube parameters on whole-head specimen. RESULTS: The internal diameter of the cochlea decreases from base to apex, resulting in a significantly different intracochlear positioning of the two tested CI models. While electrodes of the Contour Advance series are located close to the modiolus, thus closer to the spiral ganglion neurons, those of the Straight series are located further away. The artifact portion of the electrode amounts to 50–70% of the radiological diameter of the electrode. An increase in artifact portion from the base (electrode #1 approx. 50%) to the apex (electrode #20 approx. 70%) of the cochlea was observed. The visualization of electrodes in the medial and apical part of the cochlea is limited due to artifact overlapping. There was no correlation between the artifact size and the applied radiation dose. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a reduction of the radiation dose by up to 45% of the currently applied radiation dose of standard protocols would be possible. Investigations of the effects on subjective image quality still need to be performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8057993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80579932021-05-05 Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography Bevis, Nicholas Effertz, Thomas Beutner, Dirk Gueldner, Christian Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers a valid alternative to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A possible radiation dose reduction with the use of CBCT in postoperative imaging of CIs is of great importance. Whether the visualization of Cochlear Implant (CI) electrodes in CBCT correlates with the radiation dose applied was investigated in this study. METHODS: We compared the visualization quality of Contour Advance CIs to Straight CIs from Cochlear using CBCT with varying tube parameters on whole-head specimen. RESULTS: The internal diameter of the cochlea decreases from base to apex, resulting in a significantly different intracochlear positioning of the two tested CI models. While electrodes of the Contour Advance series are located close to the modiolus, thus closer to the spiral ganglion neurons, those of the Straight series are located further away. The artifact portion of the electrode amounts to 50–70% of the radiological diameter of the electrode. An increase in artifact portion from the base (electrode #1 approx. 50%) to the apex (electrode #20 approx. 70%) of the cochlea was observed. The visualization of electrodes in the medial and apical part of the cochlea is limited due to artifact overlapping. There was no correlation between the artifact size and the applied radiation dose. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a reduction of the radiation dose by up to 45% of the currently applied radiation dose of standard protocols would be possible. Investigations of the effects on subjective image quality still need to be performed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8057993/ /pubmed/32671538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06198-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Bevis, Nicholas
Effertz, Thomas
Beutner, Dirk
Gueldner, Christian
Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
title Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
title_full Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
title_short Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
title_sort evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06198-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bevisnicholas evaluationofartifactsofcochlearimplantelectrodesinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT effertzthomas evaluationofartifactsofcochlearimplantelectrodesinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT beutnerdirk evaluationofartifactsofcochlearimplantelectrodesinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT gueldnerchristian evaluationofartifactsofcochlearimplantelectrodesinconebeamcomputedtomography