Cargando…

Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy

The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Timmeren, Janita E., Chamberlain, Madalyne, Krayenbuehl, Jérôme, Wilke, Lotte, Ehrbar, Stefanie, Bogowicz, Marta, Zamburlini, Mariangela, Garcia Schüler, Helena, Pavic, Matea, Balermpas, Panagiotis, Ryu, Chaehee, Guckenberger, Matthias, Andratschke, Nicolaus, Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.001
_version_ 1783680945805590528
author van Timmeren, Janita E.
Chamberlain, Madalyne
Krayenbuehl, Jérôme
Wilke, Lotte
Ehrbar, Stefanie
Bogowicz, Marta
Zamburlini, Mariangela
Garcia Schüler, Helena
Pavic, Matea
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Ryu, Chaehee
Guckenberger, Matthias
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
author_facet van Timmeren, Janita E.
Chamberlain, Madalyne
Krayenbuehl, Jérôme
Wilke, Lotte
Ehrbar, Stefanie
Bogowicz, Marta
Zamburlini, Mariangela
Garcia Schüler, Helena
Pavic, Matea
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Ryu, Chaehee
Guckenberger, Matthias
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
author_sort van Timmeren, Janita E.
collection PubMed
description The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applied online-adapted treatment plans from 55 patients, in which the approach of re-optimization was selected based on the physician’s choice. For 33 patients where both optimization approaches were used at least once, the median treatment planning dose metrics of both target and organ at risk differed less than 1%. Therefore, we concluded that beam segment weight optimization was chosen adequately for most patients without compromising plan quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8058019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80580192021-04-23 Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy van Timmeren, Janita E. Chamberlain, Madalyne Krayenbuehl, Jérôme Wilke, Lotte Ehrbar, Stefanie Bogowicz, Marta Zamburlini, Mariangela Garcia Schüler, Helena Pavic, Matea Balermpas, Panagiotis Ryu, Chaehee Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Short Communication The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applied online-adapted treatment plans from 55 patients, in which the approach of re-optimization was selected based on the physician’s choice. For 33 patients where both optimization approaches were used at least once, the median treatment planning dose metrics of both target and organ at risk differed less than 1%. Therefore, we concluded that beam segment weight optimization was chosen adequately for most patients without compromising plan quality. Elsevier 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8058019/ /pubmed/33898777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.001 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
van Timmeren, Janita E.
Chamberlain, Madalyne
Krayenbuehl, Jérôme
Wilke, Lotte
Ehrbar, Stefanie
Bogowicz, Marta
Zamburlini, Mariangela
Garcia Schüler, Helena
Pavic, Matea
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Ryu, Chaehee
Guckenberger, Matthias
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
title Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
title_full Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
title_fullStr Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
title_short Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
title_sort comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT vantimmerenjanitae comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT chamberlainmadalyne comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT krayenbuehljerome comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT wilkelotte comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT ehrbarstefanie comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT bogowiczmarta comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT zamburlinimariangela comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT garciaschulerhelena comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT pavicmatea comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT balermpaspanagiotis comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT ryuchaehee comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT guckenbergermatthias comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT andratschkenicolaus comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy
AT tanadinilangstephanie comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy