Cargando…
Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy
The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.001 |
_version_ | 1783680945805590528 |
---|---|
author | van Timmeren, Janita E. Chamberlain, Madalyne Krayenbuehl, Jérôme Wilke, Lotte Ehrbar, Stefanie Bogowicz, Marta Zamburlini, Mariangela Garcia Schüler, Helena Pavic, Matea Balermpas, Panagiotis Ryu, Chaehee Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie |
author_facet | van Timmeren, Janita E. Chamberlain, Madalyne Krayenbuehl, Jérôme Wilke, Lotte Ehrbar, Stefanie Bogowicz, Marta Zamburlini, Mariangela Garcia Schüler, Helena Pavic, Matea Balermpas, Panagiotis Ryu, Chaehee Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie |
author_sort | van Timmeren, Janita E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applied online-adapted treatment plans from 55 patients, in which the approach of re-optimization was selected based on the physician’s choice. For 33 patients where both optimization approaches were used at least once, the median treatment planning dose metrics of both target and organ at risk differed less than 1%. Therefore, we concluded that beam segment weight optimization was chosen adequately for most patients without compromising plan quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8058019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80580192021-04-23 Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy van Timmeren, Janita E. Chamberlain, Madalyne Krayenbuehl, Jérôme Wilke, Lotte Ehrbar, Stefanie Bogowicz, Marta Zamburlini, Mariangela Garcia Schüler, Helena Pavic, Matea Balermpas, Panagiotis Ryu, Chaehee Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Short Communication The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applied online-adapted treatment plans from 55 patients, in which the approach of re-optimization was selected based on the physician’s choice. For 33 patients where both optimization approaches were used at least once, the median treatment planning dose metrics of both target and organ at risk differed less than 1%. Therefore, we concluded that beam segment weight optimization was chosen adequately for most patients without compromising plan quality. Elsevier 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8058019/ /pubmed/33898777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.001 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication van Timmeren, Janita E. Chamberlain, Madalyne Krayenbuehl, Jérôme Wilke, Lotte Ehrbar, Stefanie Bogowicz, Marta Zamburlini, Mariangela Garcia Schüler, Helena Pavic, Matea Balermpas, Panagiotis Ryu, Chaehee Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
title | Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
title_full | Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
title_short | Comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
title_sort | comparison of beam segment versus full plan re-optimization in daily magnetic resonance imaging-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vantimmerenjanitae comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT chamberlainmadalyne comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT krayenbuehljerome comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT wilkelotte comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT ehrbarstefanie comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT bogowiczmarta comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT zamburlinimariangela comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT garciaschulerhelena comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT pavicmatea comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT balermpaspanagiotis comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT ryuchaehee comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT guckenbergermatthias comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT andratschkenicolaus comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy AT tanadinilangstephanie comparisonofbeamsegmentversusfullplanreoptimizationindailymagneticresonanceimagingguidedonlineadaptiveradiotherapy |