Cargando…
Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only prostate radiotherapy using synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) algorithms with high dose accuracy has been clinically implemented. MR images can suffer from geometric distortions so Quality Assurance (QA) using an independent, geometrically accur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.005 |
_version_ | 1783680946741968896 |
---|---|
author | Wyatt, Jonathan J. Pearson, Rachel A. Walker, Christopher P. Brooks, Rachel L. Pilling, Karen McCallum, Hazel M. |
author_facet | Wyatt, Jonathan J. Pearson, Rachel A. Walker, Christopher P. Brooks, Rachel L. Pilling, Karen McCallum, Hazel M. |
author_sort | Wyatt, Jonathan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only prostate radiotherapy using synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) algorithms with high dose accuracy has been clinically implemented. MR images can suffer from geometric distortions so Quality Assurance (QA) using an independent, geometrically accurate, image could be required. The first-fraction Cone Beam CT (CBCT) has demonstrated potential but has not been evaluated in a clinical MR-only pathway. This study evaluated the clinical use of CBCT for dose accuracy QA of MR-only radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 patients treated with MR-only prostate radiotherapy were divided into two cohorts. Cohort 1 (20 patients) received a back-up CT, whilst Cohort 2 (29 patients) did not. All patients were planned using the sCT and received daily CBCT imaging with MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching. Each CBCT was calibrated using a patient-specific stepwise Hounsfield Units-to-mass density curve. The treatment plan was recalculated on the first-fraction CBCT using the clinically applied soft-tissue match and the doses compared. For Cohort 1 the sCT was rigidly registered to the back-up CT, the plan recalculated and doses compared. RESULTS: Mean sCT-CBCT dose difference across both cohorts was [Formula: see text] (standard error of the mean, range [Formula: see text]), with 47/49 patients within [[Formula: see text]]. The sCT-CBCT dose difference was systematically lower than the sCT-CT by [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] limits of agreement). The mean sCT-CBCT gamma pass rate ([Formula: see text]) was [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT-based dose accuracy QA for MR-only radiotherapy appears clinically feasible. There was a small systematic sCT-CBCT dose difference implying asymmetric tolerances of [[Formula: see text]] would be appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8058023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80580232021-04-23 Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy Wyatt, Jonathan J. Pearson, Rachel A. Walker, Christopher P. Brooks, Rachel L. Pilling, Karen McCallum, Hazel M. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only prostate radiotherapy using synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) algorithms with high dose accuracy has been clinically implemented. MR images can suffer from geometric distortions so Quality Assurance (QA) using an independent, geometrically accurate, image could be required. The first-fraction Cone Beam CT (CBCT) has demonstrated potential but has not been evaluated in a clinical MR-only pathway. This study evaluated the clinical use of CBCT for dose accuracy QA of MR-only radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 patients treated with MR-only prostate radiotherapy were divided into two cohorts. Cohort 1 (20 patients) received a back-up CT, whilst Cohort 2 (29 patients) did not. All patients were planned using the sCT and received daily CBCT imaging with MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching. Each CBCT was calibrated using a patient-specific stepwise Hounsfield Units-to-mass density curve. The treatment plan was recalculated on the first-fraction CBCT using the clinically applied soft-tissue match and the doses compared. For Cohort 1 the sCT was rigidly registered to the back-up CT, the plan recalculated and doses compared. RESULTS: Mean sCT-CBCT dose difference across both cohorts was [Formula: see text] (standard error of the mean, range [Formula: see text]), with 47/49 patients within [[Formula: see text]]. The sCT-CBCT dose difference was systematically lower than the sCT-CT by [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] limits of agreement). The mean sCT-CBCT gamma pass rate ([Formula: see text]) was [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT-based dose accuracy QA for MR-only radiotherapy appears clinically feasible. There was a small systematic sCT-CBCT dose difference implying asymmetric tolerances of [[Formula: see text]] would be appropriate. Elsevier 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8058023/ /pubmed/33898782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.005 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Wyatt, Jonathan J. Pearson, Rachel A. Walker, Christopher P. Brooks, Rachel L. Pilling, Karen McCallum, Hazel M. Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
title | Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
title_full | Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
title_short | Cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
title_sort | cone beam computed tomography for dose calculation quality assurance for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wyattjonathanj conebeamcomputedtomographyfordosecalculationqualityassuranceformagneticresonanceonlyradiotherapy AT pearsonrachela conebeamcomputedtomographyfordosecalculationqualityassuranceformagneticresonanceonlyradiotherapy AT walkerchristopherp conebeamcomputedtomographyfordosecalculationqualityassuranceformagneticresonanceonlyradiotherapy AT brooksrachell conebeamcomputedtomographyfordosecalculationqualityassuranceformagneticresonanceonlyradiotherapy AT pillingkaren conebeamcomputedtomographyfordosecalculationqualityassuranceformagneticresonanceonlyradiotherapy AT mccallumhazelm conebeamcomputedtomographyfordosecalculationqualityassuranceformagneticresonanceonlyradiotherapy |