Cargando…
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.003 |
_version_ | 1783680948114554880 |
---|---|
author | Kavaluus, Henna Nousiainen, Katri Kaijaluoto, Sampsa Seppälä, Tiina Saarilahti, Kauko Tenhunen, Mikko |
author_facet | Kavaluus, Henna Nousiainen, Katri Kaijaluoto, Sampsa Seppälä, Tiina Saarilahti, Kauko Tenhunen, Mikko |
author_sort | Kavaluus, Henna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. RESULTS: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. CONCLUSIONS: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8058029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80580292021-04-23 Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning Kavaluus, Henna Nousiainen, Katri Kaijaluoto, Sampsa Seppälä, Tiina Saarilahti, Kauko Tenhunen, Mikko Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. RESULTS: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. CONCLUSIONS: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results. Elsevier 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8058029/ /pubmed/33898780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Kavaluus, Henna Nousiainen, Katri Kaijaluoto, Sampsa Seppälä, Tiina Saarilahti, Kauko Tenhunen, Mikko Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title | Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_full | Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_fullStr | Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_short | Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
title_sort | determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavaluushenna determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT nousiainenkatri determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT kaijaluotosampsa determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT seppalatiina determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT saarilahtikauko determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning AT tenhunenmikko determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning |