Cargando…

Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavaluus, Henna, Nousiainen, Katri, Kaijaluoto, Sampsa, Seppälä, Tiina, Saarilahti, Kauko, Tenhunen, Mikko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.003
_version_ 1783680948114554880
author Kavaluus, Henna
Nousiainen, Katri
Kaijaluoto, Sampsa
Seppälä, Tiina
Saarilahti, Kauko
Tenhunen, Mikko
author_facet Kavaluus, Henna
Nousiainen, Katri
Kaijaluoto, Sampsa
Seppälä, Tiina
Saarilahti, Kauko
Tenhunen, Mikko
author_sort Kavaluus, Henna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. RESULTS: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. CONCLUSIONS: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8058029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80580292021-04-23 Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning Kavaluus, Henna Nousiainen, Katri Kaijaluoto, Sampsa Seppälä, Tiina Saarilahti, Kauko Tenhunen, Mikko Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used in radiotherapy planning; yet, the performance of the utilized scanners is rarely regulated by any authority. The aim of this study was to determine the geometric accuracy of several magnetic resonance imaging scanners used for radiotherapy planning, and to establish acceptance criteria for such scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The geometric accuracy of five different scanners was measured with three sequences using a commercial large-field-of-view phantom. The distortion magnitudes were determined in spherical volumes around the scanner isocenter and in cylindrical volumes along scanner z-axis. The repeatability of the measurements was determined on a single scanner with two quality assurance sequences with three single-setup and seven repeated-setup measurements. RESULTS: For all scanners and sequences except one, the mean and median distortion magnitude was <1 mm and <2 mm in spherical volumes with diameters of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively. For all sequences maximum distortion was <2 mm in spherical volume with diameter of 300 mm. The mean standard deviation of marker-by-marker distortion magnitudes over repeated acquisitions was ≤0.6 mm with both tested sequences. CONCLUSIONS: All tested scanners were geometrically accurate for their current use in radiotherapy planning. The acceptance criteria of geometric accuracy for regulatory inspections of a supervising authority could be set according to these results. Elsevier 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8058029/ /pubmed/33898780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kavaluus, Henna
Nousiainen, Katri
Kaijaluoto, Sampsa
Seppälä, Tiina
Saarilahti, Kauko
Tenhunen, Mikko
Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_full Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_fullStr Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_full_unstemmed Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_short Determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
title_sort determination of acceptance criteria for geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging scanners used in radiotherapy planning
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.003
work_keys_str_mv AT kavaluushenna determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT nousiainenkatri determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT kaijaluotosampsa determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT seppalatiina determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT saarilahtikauko determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning
AT tenhunenmikko determinationofacceptancecriteriaforgeometricaccuracyofmagneticresonanceimagingscannersusedinradiotherapyplanning