Cargando…

Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study

Background. This research aimed to investigate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris after root canal preparation using ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold, and TruNatomy systems. Methods. Forty-five extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single canals with similar lengths were used. The roo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan, Özbay, Yağız
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927838
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006
_version_ 1783680972630261760
author Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan
Özbay, Yağız
author_facet Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan
Özbay, Yağız
author_sort Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan
collection PubMed
description Background. This research aimed to investigate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris after root canal preparation using ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold, and TruNatomy systems. Methods. Forty-five extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single canals with similar lengths were used. The root canals were prepared using ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), or TruNatomy (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) files. Apically extruded debris during preparation was gathered into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. Then the Eppendorf tubes were incubated at 70°C for five days. The Eppendorf tubes were weighed again to determine their final weight plus the extruded debris. Results. The TRN system resulted in significantly less debris extrusion than the PTN system (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the PTN and PTG groups and between the PTG and TRN groups (P >0.05). Conclusion. All the instrumentation systems caused apical extrusion of debris. However, the TRN system resulted in significantly less debris extrusion than the other systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8058151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80581512021-04-28 Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan Özbay, Yağız J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. This research aimed to investigate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris after root canal preparation using ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold, and TruNatomy systems. Methods. Forty-five extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single canals with similar lengths were used. The root canals were prepared using ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), or TruNatomy (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) files. Apically extruded debris during preparation was gathered into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. Then the Eppendorf tubes were incubated at 70°C for five days. The Eppendorf tubes were weighed again to determine their final weight plus the extruded debris. Results. The TRN system resulted in significantly less debris extrusion than the PTN system (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the PTN and PTG groups and between the PTG and TRN groups (P >0.05). Conclusion. All the instrumentation systems caused apical extrusion of debris. However, the TRN system resulted in significantly less debris extrusion than the other systems. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8058151/ /pubmed/33927838 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan
Özbay, Yağız
Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
title Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
title_full Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
title_short Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
title_sort apically extruded debris associated with protaper next, protaper gold and trunatomy systems: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927838
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.006
work_keys_str_mv AT yılmazcırakogluneslihan apicallyextrudeddebrisassociatedwithprotapernextprotapergoldandtrunatomysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT ozbayyagız apicallyextrudeddebrisassociatedwithprotapernextprotapergoldandtrunatomysystemsaninvitrostudy