Cargando…

Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial

Background. The present study aimed to assess and compare the pain perception and ulcer sizes before and after applying low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and Amlexanox + lidocaine. Methods. Twenty-six patients referring to the out-patient department of the institution and diagnosed with recurrent aphth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marya, Charu Mohan, Mehlawat, Jiksha, Nagpal, Ruchi, Kataria, Sakshi, Taneja, Pratibha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927835
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.003
_version_ 1783680972866191360
author Marya, Charu Mohan
Mehlawat, Jiksha
Nagpal, Ruchi
Kataria, Sakshi
Taneja, Pratibha
author_facet Marya, Charu Mohan
Mehlawat, Jiksha
Nagpal, Ruchi
Kataria, Sakshi
Taneja, Pratibha
author_sort Marya, Charu Mohan
collection PubMed
description Background. The present study aimed to assess and compare the pain perception and ulcer sizes before and after applying low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and Amlexanox + lidocaine. Methods. Twenty-six patients referring to the out-patient department of the institution and diagnosed with recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) were assigned to two groups to receive either LLLT or Amlexanox + lidocaine. In group 1, the patients were provided with amlexanox + lidocaine to apply topically four times daily. In group 2, the patients underwent LLLT with no tissue contact in inward circular motions for two cycles for 30 seconds. This study was registered in "the Clinical Trials Registry- India" (CTRI), with the registration number CTRI/2019/09/028222. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16. Results. The intergroup comparison was performed using Mann-Whitney U test, and intragroup comparisons were made using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The level of significance was set at P <0.05. The results showed that pain perception and ulcer size were significantly lower in group 2 subjects than group 1 subjects (P <0.05). Conclusion. LLLT was more effective than amlexanox + lidocaine in the management of RAU. It is a cost-effective therapy for treating RAU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8058152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80581522021-04-28 Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial Marya, Charu Mohan Mehlawat, Jiksha Nagpal, Ruchi Kataria, Sakshi Taneja, Pratibha J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The present study aimed to assess and compare the pain perception and ulcer sizes before and after applying low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and Amlexanox + lidocaine. Methods. Twenty-six patients referring to the out-patient department of the institution and diagnosed with recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) were assigned to two groups to receive either LLLT or Amlexanox + lidocaine. In group 1, the patients were provided with amlexanox + lidocaine to apply topically four times daily. In group 2, the patients underwent LLLT with no tissue contact in inward circular motions for two cycles for 30 seconds. This study was registered in "the Clinical Trials Registry- India" (CTRI), with the registration number CTRI/2019/09/028222. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16. Results. The intergroup comparison was performed using Mann-Whitney U test, and intragroup comparisons were made using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. The level of significance was set at P <0.05. The results showed that pain perception and ulcer size were significantly lower in group 2 subjects than group 1 subjects (P <0.05). Conclusion. LLLT was more effective than amlexanox + lidocaine in the management of RAU. It is a cost-effective therapy for treating RAU. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8058152/ /pubmed/33927835 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Marya, Charu Mohan
Mehlawat, Jiksha
Nagpal, Ruchi
Kataria, Sakshi
Taneja, Pratibha
Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial
title Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAUs): A randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative assessment of low-level laser therapy (lllt) vs. topical application of amlexanox + lidocaine to treat recurrent aphthous ulcers (raus): a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927835
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.003
work_keys_str_mv AT maryacharumohan comparativeassessmentoflowlevellasertherapyllltvstopicalapplicationofamlexanoxlidocainetotreatrecurrentaphthousulcersrausarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehlawatjiksha comparativeassessmentoflowlevellasertherapyllltvstopicalapplicationofamlexanoxlidocainetotreatrecurrentaphthousulcersrausarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nagpalruchi comparativeassessmentoflowlevellasertherapyllltvstopicalapplicationofamlexanoxlidocainetotreatrecurrentaphthousulcersrausarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT katariasakshi comparativeassessmentoflowlevellasertherapyllltvstopicalapplicationofamlexanoxlidocainetotreatrecurrentaphthousulcersrausarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tanejapratibha comparativeassessmentoflowlevellasertherapyllltvstopicalapplicationofamlexanoxlidocainetotreatrecurrentaphthousulcersrausarandomizedcontrolledtrial