Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT

Background. The main goal of our study was to assess the volume of dentin removed and transportation in root canals using ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Gold (PTG) and One-Curve (OC). Ni-Ti rotary instruments in extracted human teeth using by micro-CT. Methods: Thirty human upper 1st premolar te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yalniz, Hatice, Koohnavard, Mehrdad, Oncu, Aysenur, Celikten, Berkan, Orhan, Ayse Isil, Orhan, Kaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927841
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009
_version_ 1783680975250653184
author Yalniz, Hatice
Koohnavard, Mehrdad
Oncu, Aysenur
Celikten, Berkan
Orhan, Ayse Isil
Orhan, Kaan
author_facet Yalniz, Hatice
Koohnavard, Mehrdad
Oncu, Aysenur
Celikten, Berkan
Orhan, Ayse Isil
Orhan, Kaan
author_sort Yalniz, Hatice
collection PubMed
description Background. The main goal of our study was to assess the volume of dentin removed and transportation in root canals using ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Gold (PTG) and One-Curve (OC). Ni-Ti rotary instruments in extracted human teeth using by micro-CT. Methods: Thirty human upper 1st premolar teeth with two separate root canals and sturdy, mature root tips were used in the present study. Specimens were decoronated and root length was standardized for micro CT scanning before root canal preparation done. The teeth were randomly separated into three categories (n = 10) according to the rotary NiTi system used for canal instrumentation, i.e., PTU (Dentsply, Maillefer), PTG (Dentsply, Maillefer), and OC (Micro-Mega SA). After root canal preparation, samples were scanned again on micro-CT by the same scanning parameters. Surface area, canal volume, structure model index (SMI), percentage of uninstrumented area and transportation parameters were obtained for each sample before and after micro-CT analyse. Results: No significant differences between the PTG and PTU in terms of the total volume of removed dentin, surface area and percentage of uninstrumented areas were found. However, regarding to parameters above, OC showed a lower efficacy than PTG and PTU in coronal section. Regarding canal transportation, PTG and OC showed lower mean transportation values at all levels. Conclusion: This paper demonstrated the root canal shaping abilities of the PTU, PTG, and OC NiTi file systems. The PTG and OC systems were associated less canal transportation and a better ability to preserve dentinal walls than PTU. There was no significance different between all rotary file systems for SMI values however, PTU and PTG showed greater canal volume and surface area change than OC file systems in coronal section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8058162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80581622021-04-28 Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT Yalniz, Hatice Koohnavard, Mehrdad Oncu, Aysenur Celikten, Berkan Orhan, Ayse Isil Orhan, Kaan J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The main goal of our study was to assess the volume of dentin removed and transportation in root canals using ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Gold (PTG) and One-Curve (OC). Ni-Ti rotary instruments in extracted human teeth using by micro-CT. Methods: Thirty human upper 1st premolar teeth with two separate root canals and sturdy, mature root tips were used in the present study. Specimens were decoronated and root length was standardized for micro CT scanning before root canal preparation done. The teeth were randomly separated into three categories (n = 10) according to the rotary NiTi system used for canal instrumentation, i.e., PTU (Dentsply, Maillefer), PTG (Dentsply, Maillefer), and OC (Micro-Mega SA). After root canal preparation, samples were scanned again on micro-CT by the same scanning parameters. Surface area, canal volume, structure model index (SMI), percentage of uninstrumented area and transportation parameters were obtained for each sample before and after micro-CT analyse. Results: No significant differences between the PTG and PTU in terms of the total volume of removed dentin, surface area and percentage of uninstrumented areas were found. However, regarding to parameters above, OC showed a lower efficacy than PTG and PTU in coronal section. Regarding canal transportation, PTG and OC showed lower mean transportation values at all levels. Conclusion: This paper demonstrated the root canal shaping abilities of the PTU, PTG, and OC NiTi file systems. The PTG and OC systems were associated less canal transportation and a better ability to preserve dentinal walls than PTU. There was no significance different between all rotary file systems for SMI values however, PTU and PTG showed greater canal volume and surface area change than OC file systems in coronal section. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8058162/ /pubmed/33927841 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yalniz, Hatice
Koohnavard, Mehrdad
Oncu, Aysenur
Celikten, Berkan
Orhan, Ayse Isil
Orhan, Kaan
Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
title Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
title_full Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
title_short Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
title_sort comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the protaper universal, protaper gold, and one-curve instruments using micro-ct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927841
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.009
work_keys_str_mv AT yalnizhatice comparativeevaluationofdentinvolumeremovalandcentralizationoftherootcanalaftershapingwiththeprotaperuniversalprotapergoldandonecurveinstrumentsusingmicroct
AT koohnavardmehrdad comparativeevaluationofdentinvolumeremovalandcentralizationoftherootcanalaftershapingwiththeprotaperuniversalprotapergoldandonecurveinstrumentsusingmicroct
AT oncuaysenur comparativeevaluationofdentinvolumeremovalandcentralizationoftherootcanalaftershapingwiththeprotaperuniversalprotapergoldandonecurveinstrumentsusingmicroct
AT celiktenberkan comparativeevaluationofdentinvolumeremovalandcentralizationoftherootcanalaftershapingwiththeprotaperuniversalprotapergoldandonecurveinstrumentsusingmicroct
AT orhanayseisil comparativeevaluationofdentinvolumeremovalandcentralizationoftherootcanalaftershapingwiththeprotaperuniversalprotapergoldandonecurveinstrumentsusingmicroct
AT orhankaan comparativeevaluationofdentinvolumeremovalandcentralizationoftherootcanalaftershapingwiththeprotaperuniversalprotapergoldandonecurveinstrumentsusingmicroct