Cargando…
Social media, self-harm and suicide
Use of social media by people with mental health problems, and especially those who are prone to self-harm, has potential advantages and disadvantages. This poses a dilemma about how and by how much the form and content of social media sites should be regulated. Unfortunately, participation in the p...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2019.94 |
_version_ | 1783681099401003008 |
---|---|
author | House, Allan |
author_facet | House, Allan |
author_sort | House, Allan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Use of social media by people with mental health problems, and especially those who are prone to self-harm, has potential advantages and disadvantages. This poses a dilemma about how and by how much the form and content of social media sites should be regulated. Unfortunately, participation in the public debate about this dilemma has been restricted and high-profile discussion of necessary action has been focused almost entirely on how much suppression of content is justified. Professional bodies, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists, should be doing much more than they are to shape how the debate is conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8058875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80588752021-05-04 Social media, self-harm and suicide House, Allan BJPsych Bull Editorial Use of social media by people with mental health problems, and especially those who are prone to self-harm, has potential advantages and disadvantages. This poses a dilemma about how and by how much the form and content of social media sites should be regulated. Unfortunately, participation in the public debate about this dilemma has been restricted and high-profile discussion of necessary action has been focused almost entirely on how much suppression of content is justified. Professional bodies, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists, should be doing much more than they are to shape how the debate is conducted. Cambridge University Press 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8058875/ /pubmed/31957627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2019.94 Text en © The Author 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial House, Allan Social media, self-harm and suicide |
title | Social media, self-harm and suicide |
title_full | Social media, self-harm and suicide |
title_fullStr | Social media, self-harm and suicide |
title_full_unstemmed | Social media, self-harm and suicide |
title_short | Social media, self-harm and suicide |
title_sort | social media, self-harm and suicide |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2019.94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houseallan socialmediaselfharmandsuicide |