Cargando…

Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry

BACKGROUND: An assumption in many analyses of longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO) data is that there is a single population following a single health trajectory. One approach that may help researchers move beyond this traditional assumption, with its inherent limitations, is growth mixture m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Jae-Yung, Sawatzky, Richard, Baumbusch, Jennifer, Lauck, Sandra, Ratner, Pamela A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01276-z
_version_ 1783681117008691200
author Kwon, Jae-Yung
Sawatzky, Richard
Baumbusch, Jennifer
Lauck, Sandra
Ratner, Pamela A.
author_facet Kwon, Jae-Yung
Sawatzky, Richard
Baumbusch, Jennifer
Lauck, Sandra
Ratner, Pamela A.
author_sort Kwon, Jae-Yung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An assumption in many analyses of longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO) data is that there is a single population following a single health trajectory. One approach that may help researchers move beyond this traditional assumption, with its inherent limitations, is growth mixture modelling (GMM), which can identify and assess multiple unobserved trajectories of patients’ health outcomes. We describe the process that was undertaken for a GMM analysis of longitudinal PRO data captured by a clinical registry for outpatients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This expository paper describes the modelling approach and some methodological issues that require particular attention, including (a) determining the metric of time, (b) specifying the GMMs, and (c) including predictors of membership in the identified latent classes (groups or subtypes of patients with distinct trajectories). An example is provided of a longitudinal analysis of PRO data (patients’ responses to the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire) collected between 2008 and 2016 for a population-based cardiac registry and deterministically linked with administrative health data. RESULTS: In determining the metric of time, multiple processes were required to ensure that “time” accounted for both the frequency and timing of the measurement occurrences in light of the variability in both the number of measures taken and the intervals between those measures. In specifying the GMM, convergence issues, a common problem that results in unreliable model estimates, required constrained parameter exploration techniques. For the identification of predictors of the latent classes, the 3-step (stepwise) approach was selected such that the addition of predictor variables did not change class membership itself. CONCLUSIONS: GMM can be a valuable tool for classifying multiple unique PRO trajectories that have previously been unobserved in real-world applications; however, their use requires substantial transparency regarding the processes underlying model building as they can directly affect the results and therefore their interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8058975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80589752021-04-21 Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry Kwon, Jae-Yung Sawatzky, Richard Baumbusch, Jennifer Lauck, Sandra Ratner, Pamela A. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: An assumption in many analyses of longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO) data is that there is a single population following a single health trajectory. One approach that may help researchers move beyond this traditional assumption, with its inherent limitations, is growth mixture modelling (GMM), which can identify and assess multiple unobserved trajectories of patients’ health outcomes. We describe the process that was undertaken for a GMM analysis of longitudinal PRO data captured by a clinical registry for outpatients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This expository paper describes the modelling approach and some methodological issues that require particular attention, including (a) determining the metric of time, (b) specifying the GMMs, and (c) including predictors of membership in the identified latent classes (groups or subtypes of patients with distinct trajectories). An example is provided of a longitudinal analysis of PRO data (patients’ responses to the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire) collected between 2008 and 2016 for a population-based cardiac registry and deterministically linked with administrative health data. RESULTS: In determining the metric of time, multiple processes were required to ensure that “time” accounted for both the frequency and timing of the measurement occurrences in light of the variability in both the number of measures taken and the intervals between those measures. In specifying the GMM, convergence issues, a common problem that results in unreliable model estimates, required constrained parameter exploration techniques. For the identification of predictors of the latent classes, the 3-step (stepwise) approach was selected such that the addition of predictor variables did not change class membership itself. CONCLUSIONS: GMM can be a valuable tool for classifying multiple unique PRO trajectories that have previously been unobserved in real-world applications; however, their use requires substantial transparency regarding the processes underlying model building as they can directly affect the results and therefore their interpretation. BioMed Central 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8058975/ /pubmed/33882863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01276-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kwon, Jae-Yung
Sawatzky, Richard
Baumbusch, Jennifer
Lauck, Sandra
Ratner, Pamela A.
Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
title Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
title_full Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
title_fullStr Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
title_full_unstemmed Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
title_short Growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
title_sort growth mixture models: a case example of the longitudinal analysis of patient‐reported outcomes data captured by a clinical registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01276-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonjaeyung growthmixturemodelsacaseexampleofthelongitudinalanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesdatacapturedbyaclinicalregistry
AT sawatzkyrichard growthmixturemodelsacaseexampleofthelongitudinalanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesdatacapturedbyaclinicalregistry
AT baumbuschjennifer growthmixturemodelsacaseexampleofthelongitudinalanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesdatacapturedbyaclinicalregistry
AT laucksandra growthmixturemodelsacaseexampleofthelongitudinalanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesdatacapturedbyaclinicalregistry
AT ratnerpamelaa growthmixturemodelsacaseexampleofthelongitudinalanalysisofpatientreportedoutcomesdatacapturedbyaclinicalregistry