Cargando…
Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
Pelvic exenterations are known to be a last resort therapeutic option for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies, which are known to have poor prognosis. All women treated with anterior (APE) or total (TPE) pelvic exenteration at our University hospital within a five-year period were identif...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100757 |
_version_ | 1783681134871183360 |
---|---|
author | ter Glane, L. Hegele, A. Wagner, U. Boekhoff, J. |
author_facet | ter Glane, L. Hegele, A. Wagner, U. Boekhoff, J. |
author_sort | ter Glane, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pelvic exenterations are known to be a last resort therapeutic option for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies, which are known to have poor prognosis. All women treated with anterior (APE) or total (TPE) pelvic exenteration at our University hospital within a five-year period were identified and their data retrospectively analysed. Parameters such as demographic information, tumor type and stage, previous therapy as well as complication rate and overall survival were evaluated. 47 women were enrolled in this study. Most common indication for PE was cervical cancer (51.1%) followed by carcinoma of the vagina (17%), vulva (10.6%), endometrium (8.5%), ovaries (4.3%) and uterus (2.1%). Patients had received 1, 2 or 3 treatment modalities prior in 12.8%, 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. Predominant urinary diversion was ileum conduit (75.5%). Major complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ III) were observed in 40.4%, none in 19.2%. Early mortality was 4.3%. Median Overall Survival (mOS) was 14 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. After a median follow up of 47 months, 25.5% were still alive. Excluding patients with metastatic disease (n = 10), mOS was 20.6 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 46% and 35.2%. OS was significantly worse for patients with positive margins (p = 0.003). Receiving neoadjuvant treatment (25.5%) correlated with negative margins (p = 0.013) but not with overall survival. PE is feasible with acceptable complication and mortality rates. The long-time benefit is notable bearing in mind the extensive nature of the malignancies and the procedure undertaken. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80590602021-04-23 Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications ter Glane, L. Hegele, A. Wagner, U. Boekhoff, J. Gynecol Oncol Rep Research Report Pelvic exenterations are known to be a last resort therapeutic option for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies, which are known to have poor prognosis. All women treated with anterior (APE) or total (TPE) pelvic exenteration at our University hospital within a five-year period were identified and their data retrospectively analysed. Parameters such as demographic information, tumor type and stage, previous therapy as well as complication rate and overall survival were evaluated. 47 women were enrolled in this study. Most common indication for PE was cervical cancer (51.1%) followed by carcinoma of the vagina (17%), vulva (10.6%), endometrium (8.5%), ovaries (4.3%) and uterus (2.1%). Patients had received 1, 2 or 3 treatment modalities prior in 12.8%, 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. Predominant urinary diversion was ileum conduit (75.5%). Major complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ III) were observed in 40.4%, none in 19.2%. Early mortality was 4.3%. Median Overall Survival (mOS) was 14 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. After a median follow up of 47 months, 25.5% were still alive. Excluding patients with metastatic disease (n = 10), mOS was 20.6 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 46% and 35.2%. OS was significantly worse for patients with positive margins (p = 0.003). Receiving neoadjuvant treatment (25.5%) correlated with negative margins (p = 0.013) but not with overall survival. PE is feasible with acceptable complication and mortality rates. The long-time benefit is notable bearing in mind the extensive nature of the malignancies and the procedure undertaken. Elsevier 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8059060/ /pubmed/33898694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100757 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Report ter Glane, L. Hegele, A. Wagner, U. Boekhoff, J. Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications |
title | Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications |
title_full | Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications |
title_fullStr | Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications |
title_full_unstemmed | Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications |
title_short | Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications |
title_sort | pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – analysis of outcome and complications |
topic | Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terglanel pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications AT hegelea pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications AT wagneru pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications AT boekhoffj pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications |