Cargando…

Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications

Pelvic exenterations are known to be a last resort therapeutic option for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies, which are known to have poor prognosis. All women treated with anterior (APE) or total (TPE) pelvic exenteration at our University hospital within a five-year period were identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ter Glane, L., Hegele, A., Wagner, U., Boekhoff, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100757
_version_ 1783681134871183360
author ter Glane, L.
Hegele, A.
Wagner, U.
Boekhoff, J.
author_facet ter Glane, L.
Hegele, A.
Wagner, U.
Boekhoff, J.
author_sort ter Glane, L.
collection PubMed
description Pelvic exenterations are known to be a last resort therapeutic option for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies, which are known to have poor prognosis. All women treated with anterior (APE) or total (TPE) pelvic exenteration at our University hospital within a five-year period were identified and their data retrospectively analysed. Parameters such as demographic information, tumor type and stage, previous therapy as well as complication rate and overall survival were evaluated. 47 women were enrolled in this study. Most common indication for PE was cervical cancer (51.1%) followed by carcinoma of the vagina (17%), vulva (10.6%), endometrium (8.5%), ovaries (4.3%) and uterus (2.1%). Patients had received 1, 2 or 3 treatment modalities prior in 12.8%, 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. Predominant urinary diversion was ileum conduit (75.5%). Major complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ III) were observed in 40.4%, none in 19.2%. Early mortality was 4.3%. Median Overall Survival (mOS) was 14 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. After a median follow up of 47 months, 25.5% were still alive. Excluding patients with metastatic disease (n = 10), mOS was 20.6 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 46% and 35.2%. OS was significantly worse for patients with positive margins (p = 0.003). Receiving neoadjuvant treatment (25.5%) correlated with negative margins (p = 0.013) but not with overall survival. PE is feasible with acceptable complication and mortality rates. The long-time benefit is notable bearing in mind the extensive nature of the malignancies and the procedure undertaken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8059060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80590602021-04-23 Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications ter Glane, L. Hegele, A. Wagner, U. Boekhoff, J. Gynecol Oncol Rep Research Report Pelvic exenterations are known to be a last resort therapeutic option for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies, which are known to have poor prognosis. All women treated with anterior (APE) or total (TPE) pelvic exenteration at our University hospital within a five-year period were identified and their data retrospectively analysed. Parameters such as demographic information, tumor type and stage, previous therapy as well as complication rate and overall survival were evaluated. 47 women were enrolled in this study. Most common indication for PE was cervical cancer (51.1%) followed by carcinoma of the vagina (17%), vulva (10.6%), endometrium (8.5%), ovaries (4.3%) and uterus (2.1%). Patients had received 1, 2 or 3 treatment modalities prior in 12.8%, 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. Predominant urinary diversion was ileum conduit (75.5%). Major complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ III) were observed in 40.4%, none in 19.2%. Early mortality was 4.3%. Median Overall Survival (mOS) was 14 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 38.8% and 21.2% respectively. After a median follow up of 47 months, 25.5% were still alive. Excluding patients with metastatic disease (n = 10), mOS was 20.6 months with 2- and 3-year survival rates of 46% and 35.2%. OS was significantly worse for patients with positive margins (p = 0.003). Receiving neoadjuvant treatment (25.5%) correlated with negative margins (p = 0.013) but not with overall survival. PE is feasible with acceptable complication and mortality rates. The long-time benefit is notable bearing in mind the extensive nature of the malignancies and the procedure undertaken. Elsevier 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8059060/ /pubmed/33898694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100757 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Report
ter Glane, L.
Hegele, A.
Wagner, U.
Boekhoff, J.
Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
title Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
title_full Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
title_fullStr Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
title_short Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – Analysis of outcome and complications
title_sort pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced gynecologic malignancies – analysis of outcome and complications
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100757
work_keys_str_mv AT terglanel pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications
AT hegelea pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications
AT wagneru pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications
AT boekhoffj pelvicexenterationforrecurrentoradvancedgynecologicmalignanciesanalysisofoutcomeandcomplications