Cargando…
Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
BACKGROUND: Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y |
_version_ | 1783681145123110912 |
---|---|
author | Disbeschl, Stefanie Surgey, Alun Roberts, Jessica L. Hendry, Annie Lewis, Ruth Goulden, Nia Hoare, Zoe Williams, Nefyn Anthony, Bethany Fern Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Law, Rebecca-Jane Hiscock, Julia Carson-Stevens, Andrew Neal, Richard D. Wilkinson, Clare |
author_facet | Disbeschl, Stefanie Surgey, Alun Roberts, Jessica L. Hendry, Annie Lewis, Ruth Goulden, Nia Hoare, Zoe Williams, Nefyn Anthony, Bethany Fern Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Law, Rebecca-Jane Hiscock, Julia Carson-Stevens, Andrew Neal, Richard D. Wilkinson, Clare |
author_sort | Disbeschl, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safety netting can be used to manage diagnostic uncertainty by ensuring patients with vague symptoms are appropriately monitored, which is now even more crucial due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact on cancer referrals. The ThinkCancer! workshop is an educational behaviour change intervention aimed at the whole general practice team, designed to improve primary care approaches to ensure timely diagnosis of cancer. The workshop will consist of teaching and awareness sessions, the appointment of a Safety Netting Champion and the development of a bespoke Safety Netting Plan and has been adapted so it can be delivered remotely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the ThinkCancer! intervention for a future definitive randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The ThinkCancer! study is a randomised, multisite feasibility trial, with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis. Twenty-three to 30 general practices will be recruited across Wales, randomised in a ratio of 2:1 of intervention versus control who will follow usual care. The workshop will be delivered by a GP educator and will be adapted iteratively throughout the trial period. Baseline practice characteristics will be collected via questionnaire. We will also collect primary care intervals (PCI), 2-week wait (2WW) referral rates, conversion rates and detection rates at baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. Participant feedback, researcher reflections and economic costings will be collected following each workshop. A process evaluation will assess implementation using an adapted Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire and qualitative interviews. An economic feasibility analysis will inform a future economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: This study will allow us to test and further develop a novel evidenced-based complex intervention aimed at general practice teams to expedite the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. The results from this study will inform the future design of a full-scale definitive phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04823559. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80591312021-04-22 Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales Disbeschl, Stefanie Surgey, Alun Roberts, Jessica L. Hendry, Annie Lewis, Ruth Goulden, Nia Hoare, Zoe Williams, Nefyn Anthony, Bethany Fern Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Law, Rebecca-Jane Hiscock, Julia Carson-Stevens, Andrew Neal, Richard D. Wilkinson, Clare Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safety netting can be used to manage diagnostic uncertainty by ensuring patients with vague symptoms are appropriately monitored, which is now even more crucial due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact on cancer referrals. The ThinkCancer! workshop is an educational behaviour change intervention aimed at the whole general practice team, designed to improve primary care approaches to ensure timely diagnosis of cancer. The workshop will consist of teaching and awareness sessions, the appointment of a Safety Netting Champion and the development of a bespoke Safety Netting Plan and has been adapted so it can be delivered remotely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the ThinkCancer! intervention for a future definitive randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The ThinkCancer! study is a randomised, multisite feasibility trial, with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis. Twenty-three to 30 general practices will be recruited across Wales, randomised in a ratio of 2:1 of intervention versus control who will follow usual care. The workshop will be delivered by a GP educator and will be adapted iteratively throughout the trial period. Baseline practice characteristics will be collected via questionnaire. We will also collect primary care intervals (PCI), 2-week wait (2WW) referral rates, conversion rates and detection rates at baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. Participant feedback, researcher reflections and economic costings will be collected following each workshop. A process evaluation will assess implementation using an adapted Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire and qualitative interviews. An economic feasibility analysis will inform a future economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: This study will allow us to test and further develop a novel evidenced-based complex intervention aimed at general practice teams to expedite the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. The results from this study will inform the future design of a full-scale definitive phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04823559. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y. BioMed Central 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059131/ /pubmed/33883033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Disbeschl, Stefanie Surgey, Alun Roberts, Jessica L. Hendry, Annie Lewis, Ruth Goulden, Nia Hoare, Zoe Williams, Nefyn Anthony, Bethany Fern Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Law, Rebecca-Jane Hiscock, Julia Carson-Stevens, Andrew Neal, Richard D. Wilkinson, Clare Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales |
title | Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales |
title_full | Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales |
title_short | Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales |
title_sort | protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of thinkcancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in wales |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT disbeschlstefanie protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT surgeyalun protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT robertsjessical protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT hendryannie protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT lewisruth protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT gouldennia protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT hoarezoe protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT williamsnefyn protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT anthonybethanyfern protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT edwardsrhiannontudor protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT lawrebeccajane protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT hiscockjulia protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT carsonstevensandrew protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT nealrichardd protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales AT wilkinsonclare protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales |