Cargando…

Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales

BACKGROUND: Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Disbeschl, Stefanie, Surgey, Alun, Roberts, Jessica L., Hendry, Annie, Lewis, Ruth, Goulden, Nia, Hoare, Zoe, Williams, Nefyn, Anthony, Bethany Fern, Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Law, Rebecca-Jane, Hiscock, Julia, Carson-Stevens, Andrew, Neal, Richard D., Wilkinson, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y
_version_ 1783681145123110912
author Disbeschl, Stefanie
Surgey, Alun
Roberts, Jessica L.
Hendry, Annie
Lewis, Ruth
Goulden, Nia
Hoare, Zoe
Williams, Nefyn
Anthony, Bethany Fern
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Law, Rebecca-Jane
Hiscock, Julia
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Neal, Richard D.
Wilkinson, Clare
author_facet Disbeschl, Stefanie
Surgey, Alun
Roberts, Jessica L.
Hendry, Annie
Lewis, Ruth
Goulden, Nia
Hoare, Zoe
Williams, Nefyn
Anthony, Bethany Fern
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Law, Rebecca-Jane
Hiscock, Julia
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Neal, Richard D.
Wilkinson, Clare
author_sort Disbeschl, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safety netting can be used to manage diagnostic uncertainty by ensuring patients with vague symptoms are appropriately monitored, which is now even more crucial due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact on cancer referrals. The ThinkCancer! workshop is an educational behaviour change intervention aimed at the whole general practice team, designed to improve primary care approaches to ensure timely diagnosis of cancer. The workshop will consist of teaching and awareness sessions, the appointment of a Safety Netting Champion and the development of a bespoke Safety Netting Plan and has been adapted so it can be delivered remotely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the ThinkCancer! intervention for a future definitive randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The ThinkCancer! study is a randomised, multisite feasibility trial, with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis. Twenty-three to 30 general practices will be recruited across Wales, randomised in a ratio of 2:1 of intervention versus control who will follow usual care. The workshop will be delivered by a GP educator and will be adapted iteratively throughout the trial period. Baseline practice characteristics will be collected via questionnaire. We will also collect primary care intervals (PCI), 2-week wait (2WW) referral rates, conversion rates and detection rates at baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. Participant feedback, researcher reflections and economic costings will be collected following each workshop. A process evaluation will assess implementation using an adapted Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire and qualitative interviews. An economic feasibility analysis will inform a future economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: This study will allow us to test and further develop a novel evidenced-based complex intervention aimed at general practice teams to expedite the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. The results from this study will inform the future design of a full-scale definitive phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04823559. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8059131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80591312021-04-22 Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales Disbeschl, Stefanie Surgey, Alun Roberts, Jessica L. Hendry, Annie Lewis, Ruth Goulden, Nia Hoare, Zoe Williams, Nefyn Anthony, Bethany Fern Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Law, Rebecca-Jane Hiscock, Julia Carson-Stevens, Andrew Neal, Richard D. Wilkinson, Clare Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Compared to the rest of Europe, the UK has relatively poor cancer outcomes, with late diagnosis and a slow referral process being major contributors. General practitioners (GPs) are often faced with patients presenting with a multitude of non-specific symptoms that could be cancer. Safety netting can be used to manage diagnostic uncertainty by ensuring patients with vague symptoms are appropriately monitored, which is now even more crucial due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact on cancer referrals. The ThinkCancer! workshop is an educational behaviour change intervention aimed at the whole general practice team, designed to improve primary care approaches to ensure timely diagnosis of cancer. The workshop will consist of teaching and awareness sessions, the appointment of a Safety Netting Champion and the development of a bespoke Safety Netting Plan and has been adapted so it can be delivered remotely. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the ThinkCancer! intervention for a future definitive randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The ThinkCancer! study is a randomised, multisite feasibility trial, with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis. Twenty-three to 30 general practices will be recruited across Wales, randomised in a ratio of 2:1 of intervention versus control who will follow usual care. The workshop will be delivered by a GP educator and will be adapted iteratively throughout the trial period. Baseline practice characteristics will be collected via questionnaire. We will also collect primary care intervals (PCI), 2-week wait (2WW) referral rates, conversion rates and detection rates at baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. Participant feedback, researcher reflections and economic costings will be collected following each workshop. A process evaluation will assess implementation using an adapted Normalisation Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire and qualitative interviews. An economic feasibility analysis will inform a future economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: This study will allow us to test and further develop a novel evidenced-based complex intervention aimed at general practice teams to expedite the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. The results from this study will inform the future design of a full-scale definitive phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04823559. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y. BioMed Central 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059131/ /pubmed/33883033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Disbeschl, Stefanie
Surgey, Alun
Roberts, Jessica L.
Hendry, Annie
Lewis, Ruth
Goulden, Nia
Hoare, Zoe
Williams, Nefyn
Anthony, Bethany Fern
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Law, Rebecca-Jane
Hiscock, Julia
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Neal, Richard D.
Wilkinson, Clare
Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
title Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
title_full Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
title_fullStr Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
title_short Protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of ThinkCancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in Wales
title_sort protocol for a feasibility study incorporating a randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and feasibility economic analysis of thinkcancer!: a primary care intervention to expedite cancer diagnosis in wales
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00834-y
work_keys_str_mv AT disbeschlstefanie protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT surgeyalun protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT robertsjessical protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT hendryannie protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT lewisruth protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT gouldennia protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT hoarezoe protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT williamsnefyn protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT anthonybethanyfern protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT edwardsrhiannontudor protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT lawrebeccajane protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT hiscockjulia protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT carsonstevensandrew protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT nealrichardd protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales
AT wilkinsonclare protocolforafeasibilitystudyincorporatingarandomisedpilottrialwithanembeddedprocessevaluationandfeasibilityeconomicanalysisofthinkcanceraprimarycareinterventiontoexpeditecancerdiagnosisinwales