Cargando…
Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer
We assessed the quality of online health and nutrition information using a Google™ search on “supplements for cancer”. Search results were scored using the Health Information Quality Index (HIQI), a quality-rating tool consisting of 12 objective criteria related to website domain, lack of commercial...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab002 |
_version_ | 1783681156545249280 |
---|---|
author | Cai, Hannah C King, Leanne E Dwyer, Johanna T |
author_facet | Cai, Hannah C King, Leanne E Dwyer, Johanna T |
author_sort | Cai, Hannah C |
collection | PubMed |
description | We assessed the quality of online health and nutrition information using a Google™ search on “supplements for cancer”. Search results were scored using the Health Information Quality Index (HIQI), a quality-rating tool consisting of 12 objective criteria related to website domain, lack of commercial aspects, and authoritative nature of the health and nutrition information provided. Possible scores ranged from 0 (lowest) to 12 (“perfect” or highest quality). After eliminating irrelevant results, the remaining 160 search results had median and mean scores of 8. One-quarter of the results were of high quality (score of 10–12). There was no correlation between high-quality scores and early appearance in the sequence of search results, where results are presumably more visible. Also, 496 advertisements, over twice the number of search results, appeared. We conclude that the Google™ search engine may have shortcomings when used to obtain information on dietary supplements and cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80591962021-04-29 Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer Cai, Hannah C King, Leanne E Dwyer, Johanna T Curr Dev Nutr Brief Communication: Research Report We assessed the quality of online health and nutrition information using a Google™ search on “supplements for cancer”. Search results were scored using the Health Information Quality Index (HIQI), a quality-rating tool consisting of 12 objective criteria related to website domain, lack of commercial aspects, and authoritative nature of the health and nutrition information provided. Possible scores ranged from 0 (lowest) to 12 (“perfect” or highest quality). After eliminating irrelevant results, the remaining 160 search results had median and mean scores of 8. One-quarter of the results were of high quality (score of 10–12). There was no correlation between high-quality scores and early appearance in the sequence of search results, where results are presumably more visible. Also, 496 advertisements, over twice the number of search results, appeared. We conclude that the Google™ search engine may have shortcomings when used to obtain information on dietary supplements and cancer. Oxford University Press 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8059196/ /pubmed/33937613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab002 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication: Research Report Cai, Hannah C King, Leanne E Dwyer, Johanna T Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer |
title | Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer |
title_full | Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer |
title_fullStr | Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer |
title_short | Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer |
title_sort | using the google™ search engine for health information: is there a problem? case study: supplements for cancer |
topic | Brief Communication: Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caihannahc usingthegooglesearchengineforhealthinformationisthereaproblemcasestudysupplementsforcancer AT kingleannee usingthegooglesearchengineforhealthinformationisthereaproblemcasestudysupplementsforcancer AT dwyerjohannat usingthegooglesearchengineforhealthinformationisthereaproblemcasestudysupplementsforcancer |