Cargando…

Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tenewitz, Chase, Le, Rebecca T., Hernandez, Mauricio, Baig, Saif, Meyer, Travis E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00102-y
_version_ 1783681158699024384
author Tenewitz, Chase
Le, Rebecca T.
Hernandez, Mauricio
Baig, Saif
Meyer, Travis E.
author_facet Tenewitz, Chase
Le, Rebecca T.
Hernandez, Mauricio
Baig, Saif
Meyer, Travis E.
author_sort Tenewitz, Chase
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, the purpose of this review was to assess the state of current literature regarding the use of 3D printed simulation models in IR procedural simulation experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature query was conducted through April 2020 for articles discussing three-dimensional printing for simulations in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases using key terms relating to 3D printing, radiology, simulation, training, and interventional radiology. RESULTS: We identified a scarcity of published sources, 4 total articles, that appraised the use of three-dimensional printing for simulation training in IR. While trainee feedback is generally supportive of the use of three-dimensional printing within the field, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education. CONCLUSIONS: Presently available literature endorses the use of three-dimensional printing within interventional radiology as a teaching tool. Literature documenting the benefits of 3D printed models for IR simulation has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8059217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80592172021-04-21 Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees Tenewitz, Chase Le, Rebecca T. Hernandez, Mauricio Baig, Saif Meyer, Travis E. 3D Print Med Research RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, the purpose of this review was to assess the state of current literature regarding the use of 3D printed simulation models in IR procedural simulation experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature query was conducted through April 2020 for articles discussing three-dimensional printing for simulations in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases using key terms relating to 3D printing, radiology, simulation, training, and interventional radiology. RESULTS: We identified a scarcity of published sources, 4 total articles, that appraised the use of three-dimensional printing for simulation training in IR. While trainee feedback is generally supportive of the use of three-dimensional printing within the field, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education. CONCLUSIONS: Presently available literature endorses the use of three-dimensional printing within interventional radiology as a teaching tool. Literature documenting the benefits of 3D printed models for IR simulation has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059217/ /pubmed/33881672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00102-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tenewitz, Chase
Le, Rebecca T.
Hernandez, Mauricio
Baig, Saif
Meyer, Travis E.
Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
title Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
title_full Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
title_fullStr Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
title_short Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
title_sort systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00102-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tenewitzchase systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees
AT lerebeccat systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees
AT hernandezmauricio systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees
AT baigsaif systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees
AT meyertravise systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees