Cargando…
Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00102-y |
_version_ | 1783681158699024384 |
---|---|
author | Tenewitz, Chase Le, Rebecca T. Hernandez, Mauricio Baig, Saif Meyer, Travis E. |
author_facet | Tenewitz, Chase Le, Rebecca T. Hernandez, Mauricio Baig, Saif Meyer, Travis E. |
author_sort | Tenewitz, Chase |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, the purpose of this review was to assess the state of current literature regarding the use of 3D printed simulation models in IR procedural simulation experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature query was conducted through April 2020 for articles discussing three-dimensional printing for simulations in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases using key terms relating to 3D printing, radiology, simulation, training, and interventional radiology. RESULTS: We identified a scarcity of published sources, 4 total articles, that appraised the use of three-dimensional printing for simulation training in IR. While trainee feedback is generally supportive of the use of three-dimensional printing within the field, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education. CONCLUSIONS: Presently available literature endorses the use of three-dimensional printing within interventional radiology as a teaching tool. Literature documenting the benefits of 3D printed models for IR simulation has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80592172021-04-21 Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees Tenewitz, Chase Le, Rebecca T. Hernandez, Mauricio Baig, Saif Meyer, Travis E. 3D Print Med Research RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, the purpose of this review was to assess the state of current literature regarding the use of 3D printed simulation models in IR procedural simulation experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature query was conducted through April 2020 for articles discussing three-dimensional printing for simulations in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases using key terms relating to 3D printing, radiology, simulation, training, and interventional radiology. RESULTS: We identified a scarcity of published sources, 4 total articles, that appraised the use of three-dimensional printing for simulation training in IR. While trainee feedback is generally supportive of the use of three-dimensional printing within the field, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education. CONCLUSIONS: Presently available literature endorses the use of three-dimensional printing within interventional radiology as a teaching tool. Literature documenting the benefits of 3D printed models for IR simulation has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059217/ /pubmed/33881672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00102-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tenewitz, Chase Le, Rebecca T. Hernandez, Mauricio Baig, Saif Meyer, Travis E. Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
title | Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
title_full | Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
title_short | Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
title_sort | systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33881672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00102-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tenewitzchase systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees AT lerebeccat systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees AT hernandezmauricio systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees AT baigsaif systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees AT meyertravise systematicreviewofthreedimensionalprintingforsimulationtrainingofinterventionalradiologytrainees |