Cargando…
Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining
BACKGROUND: Re-excision rates following breast conserving surgery (BCS) remain as high as ~ 35%, with positive margins detected during follow-up histopathology. Additional breast cancer resection surgery is not only taxing on the patient and health care system, but also delays adjuvant therapies, in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08179-8 |
_version_ | 1783681162688856064 |
---|---|
author | House, Broderick J. Kwon, Marcus J. Schaefer, Jasmin M. Barth, Connor W. Solanki, Allison Davis, Scott C. Gibbs, Summer L. |
author_facet | House, Broderick J. Kwon, Marcus J. Schaefer, Jasmin M. Barth, Connor W. Solanki, Allison Davis, Scott C. Gibbs, Summer L. |
author_sort | House, Broderick J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Re-excision rates following breast conserving surgery (BCS) remain as high as ~ 35%, with positive margins detected during follow-up histopathology. Additional breast cancer resection surgery is not only taxing on the patient and health care system, but also delays adjuvant therapies, increasing morbidity and reducing the likelihood of a positive outcome. The ability to precisely resect and visualize tumor margins in real time within the surgical theater would greatly benefit patients, surgeons and the health care system. Current tumor margin assessment technologies utilized during BCS involve relatively lengthy and labor-intensive protocols, which impede the surgical work flow. METHODS: In previous work, we have developed and validated a fluorescence imaging method termed dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) to accurately detect benign and malignant tissue with direct correlation to the targeted biomarker expression levels intraoperatively. The DDSI method is currently on par with touch prep cytology in execution time (~ 15-min). In this study, the main goal was to shorten the DDSI protocol by decreasing tissue blocking and washing times to optimize the DDSI protocol to < 10-min whilst maintaining robust benign and malignant tissue differentiation. RESULTS: We evaluated the utility of the shortened DDSI staining methodology using xenografts grown from cell lines with varied epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression levels, comparing accuracy through receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses across varied tissue blocking and washing times. An optimized 8-min DDSI methodology was developed for future clinical translation. CONCLUSIONS: Successful completion of this work resulted in substantial shortening of the DDSI methodology for use in the operating room, that provided robust, highly receptor specific, sensitive diagnostic capabilities between benign and malignant tissues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80592392021-04-21 Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining House, Broderick J. Kwon, Marcus J. Schaefer, Jasmin M. Barth, Connor W. Solanki, Allison Davis, Scott C. Gibbs, Summer L. BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Re-excision rates following breast conserving surgery (BCS) remain as high as ~ 35%, with positive margins detected during follow-up histopathology. Additional breast cancer resection surgery is not only taxing on the patient and health care system, but also delays adjuvant therapies, increasing morbidity and reducing the likelihood of a positive outcome. The ability to precisely resect and visualize tumor margins in real time within the surgical theater would greatly benefit patients, surgeons and the health care system. Current tumor margin assessment technologies utilized during BCS involve relatively lengthy and labor-intensive protocols, which impede the surgical work flow. METHODS: In previous work, we have developed and validated a fluorescence imaging method termed dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) to accurately detect benign and malignant tissue with direct correlation to the targeted biomarker expression levels intraoperatively. The DDSI method is currently on par with touch prep cytology in execution time (~ 15-min). In this study, the main goal was to shorten the DDSI protocol by decreasing tissue blocking and washing times to optimize the DDSI protocol to < 10-min whilst maintaining robust benign and malignant tissue differentiation. RESULTS: We evaluated the utility of the shortened DDSI staining methodology using xenografts grown from cell lines with varied epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression levels, comparing accuracy through receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses across varied tissue blocking and washing times. An optimized 8-min DDSI methodology was developed for future clinical translation. CONCLUSIONS: Successful completion of this work resulted in substantial shortening of the DDSI methodology for use in the operating room, that provided robust, highly receptor specific, sensitive diagnostic capabilities between benign and malignant tissues. BioMed Central 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059239/ /pubmed/33882909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08179-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research House, Broderick J. Kwon, Marcus J. Schaefer, Jasmin M. Barth, Connor W. Solanki, Allison Davis, Scott C. Gibbs, Summer L. Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
title | Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
title_full | Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
title_fullStr | Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
title_short | Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
title_sort | clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (ddsi) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08179-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT housebroderickj clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining AT kwonmarcusj clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining AT schaeferjasminm clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining AT barthconnorw clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining AT solankiallison clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining AT davisscottc clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining AT gibbssummerl clinicallyrelevantdualprobedifferencespecimenimagingddsiprotocolforfreshlyresectedbreastcancerspecimenstaining |