Cargando…
Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools in assessing the quality of health care from a patient perspective and are increasingly used by otologists. However, selecting the right questionnaire has proven to be a difficult and time-consuming task. To facilitate this pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9 |
_version_ | 1783681171688783872 |
---|---|
author | Viergever, Koen Kraak, Jeroen T. Bruinewoud, Els. M. Ket, Johannes C. F. Kramer, Sophia E. Merkus, Paul |
author_facet | Viergever, Koen Kraak, Jeroen T. Bruinewoud, Els. M. Ket, Johannes C. F. Kramer, Sophia E. Merkus, Paul |
author_sort | Viergever, Koen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools in assessing the quality of health care from a patient perspective and are increasingly used by otologists. However, selecting the right questionnaire has proven to be a difficult and time-consuming task. To facilitate this process, we will provide a comprehensive overview of existing questionnaires. METHODS: A systematic literature search has been conducted on August 26, 2019, using the EMBASE and PubMed medical databases. 13,345 unique records were extracted. Questionnaires addressing any otologic complaint (tinnitus, hearing loss, earache, otorrhoea, and ear-related pressure sensation, vertigo, itch, or dysgeusia) were identified. All questionnaires were evaluated for eligibility by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were adult population, closed-ended questions, English language of the questionnaire, and the availability of the original article describing the development of the instrument or a validation paper describing the validation process written in English. OBJECTIVE: Create a comprehensive overview of all validated closed-ended otology questionnaires for adults and demonstrate their basic characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of questionnaires in English literature for the adult population, subdivided per symptom and target population. RESULTS: A total of 155 unique questionnaires were selected: 33 tinnitus questionnaires, 23 vertigo questionnaires, 84 hearing loss questionnaires, and 15 multiple complaint questionnaires. A protocol for further questionnaire comparison is presented. DISCUSSION: Two separate sequential searches were needed to identify unique questionnaires and to identify their development/validation paper. Although many ear diseases create multiple symptoms, the majority of the questionnaires were symptom specific. CONCLUSION: Many questionnaires concerning ear-related symptoms exist and predominantly concern hearing loss, vertigo, or tinnitus. Only a few questionnaires cover the multiple complaints that ear diseases can create. The presented overview is the most comprehensive overview of otology questionnaires in literature to date. It will serve as a basis for questionnaire selection by professionals and could serve as a protocol for questionnaire selection in other fields. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017058155 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80592882021-04-21 Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review Viergever, Koen Kraak, Jeroen T. Bruinewoud, Els. M. Ket, Johannes C. F. Kramer, Sophia E. Merkus, Paul Syst Rev Systematic Review Update BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools in assessing the quality of health care from a patient perspective and are increasingly used by otologists. However, selecting the right questionnaire has proven to be a difficult and time-consuming task. To facilitate this process, we will provide a comprehensive overview of existing questionnaires. METHODS: A systematic literature search has been conducted on August 26, 2019, using the EMBASE and PubMed medical databases. 13,345 unique records were extracted. Questionnaires addressing any otologic complaint (tinnitus, hearing loss, earache, otorrhoea, and ear-related pressure sensation, vertigo, itch, or dysgeusia) were identified. All questionnaires were evaluated for eligibility by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were adult population, closed-ended questions, English language of the questionnaire, and the availability of the original article describing the development of the instrument or a validation paper describing the validation process written in English. OBJECTIVE: Create a comprehensive overview of all validated closed-ended otology questionnaires for adults and demonstrate their basic characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of questionnaires in English literature for the adult population, subdivided per symptom and target population. RESULTS: A total of 155 unique questionnaires were selected: 33 tinnitus questionnaires, 23 vertigo questionnaires, 84 hearing loss questionnaires, and 15 multiple complaint questionnaires. A protocol for further questionnaire comparison is presented. DISCUSSION: Two separate sequential searches were needed to identify unique questionnaires and to identify their development/validation paper. Although many ear diseases create multiple symptoms, the majority of the questionnaires were symptom specific. CONCLUSION: Many questionnaires concerning ear-related symptoms exist and predominantly concern hearing loss, vertigo, or tinnitus. Only a few questionnaires cover the multiple complaints that ear diseases can create. The presented overview is the most comprehensive overview of otology questionnaires in literature to date. It will serve as a basis for questionnaire selection by professionals and could serve as a protocol for questionnaire selection in other fields. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017058155 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9. BioMed Central 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8059288/ /pubmed/33879248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Update Viergever, Koen Kraak, Jeroen T. Bruinewoud, Els. M. Ket, Johannes C. F. Kramer, Sophia E. Merkus, Paul Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
title | Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
title_full | Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
title_fullStr | Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
title_short | Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
title_sort | questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review |
topic | Systematic Review Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01659-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viergeverkoen questionnairesinotologyasystematicmappingreview AT kraakjeroent questionnairesinotologyasystematicmappingreview AT bruinewoudelsm questionnairesinotologyasystematicmappingreview AT ketjohannescf questionnairesinotologyasystematicmappingreview AT kramersophiae questionnairesinotologyasystematicmappingreview AT merkuspaul questionnairesinotologyasystematicmappingreview |