Cargando…

Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES: To document medication abortion clinical practice changes adopted by providers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal descriptive study, comprised of three online surveys conducted between April to December, 2020. We recruited sites from email lists of national...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tschann, Mary, Ly, Elizabeth S., Hilliard, Sara, Lange, Hannah L.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33894247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.010
_version_ 1783681178659717120
author Tschann, Mary
Ly, Elizabeth S.
Hilliard, Sara
Lange, Hannah L.H.
author_facet Tschann, Mary
Ly, Elizabeth S.
Hilliard, Sara
Lange, Hannah L.H.
author_sort Tschann, Mary
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To document medication abortion clinical practice changes adopted by providers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal descriptive study, comprised of three online surveys conducted between April to December, 2020. We recruited sites from email lists of national abortion and family planning organizations. RESULTS: Seventy-four sites opted to participate. We analyzed 55/74 sites (74%) that provided medication abortion and completed all three surveys. The total number of abortion encounters reported by the sites remained consistent throughout the study period, though medication abortion encounters increased while first-trimester aspiration abortion encounters decreased. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, sites reduced the number of in-person visits associated with medication abortion and confirmation of successful termination. In February 2020, considered prepandemic, 39/55 sites (71%) required 2 or more patient visits for a medication abortion. By April 2020, 19/55 sites (35%) reported reducing the total number of in-person visits associated with a medication abortion. As of October 2020, 37 sites indicated newly adopting a practice of offering medication abortion follow-up with no in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS: Sites quickly adopted protocols incorporating practices that are well-supported in the literature, including forgoing Rh-testing and pre-abortion ultrasound in some circumstances and relying on patient report of symptoms or home pregnancy tests to confirm successful completion of medication abortion. Importantly, these practices reduce face-to-face interactions and the opportunity for virus transmission. Sustaining these changes even after the public health crisis is over may increase patient access to abortion, and these impacts should be evaluated in future research. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Medication abortion serves a critical function in maintaining access to abortion when there are limitations to in-person clinic visits. Sites throughout the country successfully and quickly adopted protocols that reduced visits associated with the abortion, reducing in-person screenings, relying on telehealth, and implementing remote follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8059330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80593302021-04-22 Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic Tschann, Mary Ly, Elizabeth S. Hilliard, Sara Lange, Hannah L.H. Contraception Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: To document medication abortion clinical practice changes adopted by providers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal descriptive study, comprised of three online surveys conducted between April to December, 2020. We recruited sites from email lists of national abortion and family planning organizations. RESULTS: Seventy-four sites opted to participate. We analyzed 55/74 sites (74%) that provided medication abortion and completed all three surveys. The total number of abortion encounters reported by the sites remained consistent throughout the study period, though medication abortion encounters increased while first-trimester aspiration abortion encounters decreased. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, sites reduced the number of in-person visits associated with medication abortion and confirmation of successful termination. In February 2020, considered prepandemic, 39/55 sites (71%) required 2 or more patient visits for a medication abortion. By April 2020, 19/55 sites (35%) reported reducing the total number of in-person visits associated with a medication abortion. As of October 2020, 37 sites indicated newly adopting a practice of offering medication abortion follow-up with no in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS: Sites quickly adopted protocols incorporating practices that are well-supported in the literature, including forgoing Rh-testing and pre-abortion ultrasound in some circumstances and relying on patient report of symptoms or home pregnancy tests to confirm successful completion of medication abortion. Importantly, these practices reduce face-to-face interactions and the opportunity for virus transmission. Sustaining these changes even after the public health crisis is over may increase patient access to abortion, and these impacts should be evaluated in future research. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Medication abortion serves a critical function in maintaining access to abortion when there are limitations to in-person clinic visits. Sites throughout the country successfully and quickly adopted protocols that reduced visits associated with the abortion, reducing in-person screenings, relying on telehealth, and implementing remote follow-up. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-07 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059330/ /pubmed/33894247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.010 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Tschann, Mary
Ly, Elizabeth S.
Hilliard, Sara
Lange, Hannah L.H.
Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33894247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.010
work_keys_str_mv AT tschannmary changestomedicationabortionclinicalpracticesinresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT lyelizabeths changestomedicationabortionclinicalpracticesinresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT hilliardsara changestomedicationabortionclinicalpracticesinresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT langehannahlh changestomedicationabortionclinicalpracticesinresponsetothecovid19pandemic