Cargando…
Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department
OBJECTIVE: Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912415 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20 |
_version_ | 1783681195120263168 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Sung-Wei |
author_facet | Liu, Sung-Wei |
author_sort | Liu, Sung-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered. This study's purpose is to identify risk factors for admission among 72-h return visit in the ED adult population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. The study period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. We excluded patients who left against medical advice or without being seen, who was admitted or transferred at the index ED visit, whose medical records were incomplete, and whose age was below 18 years old. Significant variables were selected based on univariate analysis and later entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for 72-h return admission. RESULTS: We identified 1575 eligible visits, and there were 1,119 visits entering into the final analysis. Male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44), ambulance-transport at return visit (OR = 3.68), senior staff (OR = 1.52), work-up (OR = 3.03), and longer length of stay (LOS) were associated with higher risks of admission among ED 72-h return visits. Age, comorbidity, mode of transport at index visit, consultation, triage, type of illness, outpatient department visit between ED visits, and interval between index and return visits were not significantly associated with return admission. CONCLUSION: Gender, mode of transportation, staff experience, check-up, and LOS are associated with ED return admission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80594642021-04-27 Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department Liu, Sung-Wei Tzu Chi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVE: Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered. This study's purpose is to identify risk factors for admission among 72-h return visit in the ED adult population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. The study period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. We excluded patients who left against medical advice or without being seen, who was admitted or transferred at the index ED visit, whose medical records were incomplete, and whose age was below 18 years old. Significant variables were selected based on univariate analysis and later entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for 72-h return admission. RESULTS: We identified 1575 eligible visits, and there were 1,119 visits entering into the final analysis. Male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44), ambulance-transport at return visit (OR = 3.68), senior staff (OR = 1.52), work-up (OR = 3.03), and longer length of stay (LOS) were associated with higher risks of admission among ED 72-h return visits. Age, comorbidity, mode of transport at index visit, consultation, triage, type of illness, outpatient department visit between ED visits, and interval between index and return visits were not significantly associated with return admission. CONCLUSION: Gender, mode of transportation, staff experience, check-up, and LOS are associated with ED return admission. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8059464/ /pubmed/33912415 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Tzu Chi Medical Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Liu, Sung-Wei Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
title | Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
title_full | Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
title_fullStr | Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
title_short | Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
title_sort | risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912415 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liusungwei riskfactorsofadmissionin72hreturnvisitstoemergencydepartment |