Cargando…
Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication
Bodily mimesis, the capacity to use the body representationally, was one of the key innovations that allowed early humans to go beyond the ‘baseline’ of generalized ape communication and cognition. We argue that the original human-specific communication afforded by bodily mimesis was based on signs...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0204 |
_version_ | 1783681203171229696 |
---|---|
author | Żywiczyński, Przemysław Wacewicz, Sławomir Lister, Casey |
author_facet | Żywiczyński, Przemysław Wacewicz, Sławomir Lister, Casey |
author_sort | Żywiczyński, Przemysław |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bodily mimesis, the capacity to use the body representationally, was one of the key innovations that allowed early humans to go beyond the ‘baseline’ of generalized ape communication and cognition. We argue that the original human-specific communication afforded by bodily mimesis was based on signs that involve three entities: an expression that represents an object (i.e. communicated content) for an interpreter. We further propose that the core component of this communication, pantomime, was able to transmit referential information that was not limited to select semantic domains or the ‘here-and-now’, by means of motivated—most importantly iconic—signs. Pressures for expressivity and economy then led to conventionalization of signs and a growth of linguistic characteristics: semiotic systematicity and combinatorial expression. Despite these developments, both naturalistic and experimental data suggest that the system of pantomime did not disappear and is actively used by modern humans. Its contemporary manifestations, or pantomimic fossils, emerge when language cannot be used, for instance when people do not share a common language, or in situations where the use of (spoken) language is difficult, impossible or forbidden. Under such circumstances, people bootstrap communication by means of pantomime and, when these circumstances persist, newly emergent pantomimic communication becomes increasingly language-like. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Reconstructing prehistoric languages’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80595112021-05-14 Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication Żywiczyński, Przemysław Wacewicz, Sławomir Lister, Casey Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part III: Prehistoric Behaviour, Cognition, and the Brain Bodily mimesis, the capacity to use the body representationally, was one of the key innovations that allowed early humans to go beyond the ‘baseline’ of generalized ape communication and cognition. We argue that the original human-specific communication afforded by bodily mimesis was based on signs that involve three entities: an expression that represents an object (i.e. communicated content) for an interpreter. We further propose that the core component of this communication, pantomime, was able to transmit referential information that was not limited to select semantic domains or the ‘here-and-now’, by means of motivated—most importantly iconic—signs. Pressures for expressivity and economy then led to conventionalization of signs and a growth of linguistic characteristics: semiotic systematicity and combinatorial expression. Despite these developments, both naturalistic and experimental data suggest that the system of pantomime did not disappear and is actively used by modern humans. Its contemporary manifestations, or pantomimic fossils, emerge when language cannot be used, for instance when people do not share a common language, or in situations where the use of (spoken) language is difficult, impossible or forbidden. Under such circumstances, people bootstrap communication by means of pantomime and, when these circumstances persist, newly emergent pantomimic communication becomes increasingly language-like. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Reconstructing prehistoric languages’. The Royal Society 2021-05-10 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8059511/ /pubmed/33745309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0204 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Part III: Prehistoric Behaviour, Cognition, and the Brain Żywiczyński, Przemysław Wacewicz, Sławomir Lister, Casey Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
title | Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
title_full | Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
title_fullStr | Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
title_full_unstemmed | Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
title_short | Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
title_sort | pantomimic fossils in modern human communication |
topic | Part III: Prehistoric Behaviour, Cognition, and the Brain |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zywiczynskiprzemysław pantomimicfossilsinmodernhumancommunication AT wacewiczsławomir pantomimicfossilsinmodernhumancommunication AT listercasey pantomimicfossilsinmodernhumancommunication |