Cargando…

The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility

Many computer models possess high-dimensional input spaces and substantial computational time to produce a single model evaluation. Although such models are often ‘deterministic’, these models suffer from a wide range of uncertainties. We argue that uncertainty quantification is crucial for computer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volodina, Victoria, Challenor, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33775141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0071
_version_ 1783681209686032384
author Volodina, Victoria
Challenor, Peter
author_facet Volodina, Victoria
Challenor, Peter
author_sort Volodina, Victoria
collection PubMed
description Many computer models possess high-dimensional input spaces and substantial computational time to produce a single model evaluation. Although such models are often ‘deterministic’, these models suffer from a wide range of uncertainties. We argue that uncertainty quantification is crucial for computer model validation and reproducibility. We present a statistical framework, termed history matching, for performing global parameter search by comparing model output to the observed data. We employ Gaussian process (GP) emulators to produce fast predictions about model behaviour at the arbitrary input parameter settings allowing output uncertainty distributions to be calculated. History matching identifies sets of input parameters that give rise to acceptable matches between observed data and model output given our representation of uncertainties. Modellers could proceed by simulating computer models’ outputs of interest at these identified parameter settings and producing a range of predictions. The variability in model results is crucial for inter-model comparison as well as model development. We illustrate the performance of emulation and history matching on a simple one-dimensional toy model and in application to a climate model. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Reliability and reproducibility in computational science: implementing verification, validation and uncertainty quantification in silico’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8059558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80595582022-02-02 The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility Volodina, Victoria Challenor, Peter Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles Many computer models possess high-dimensional input spaces and substantial computational time to produce a single model evaluation. Although such models are often ‘deterministic’, these models suffer from a wide range of uncertainties. We argue that uncertainty quantification is crucial for computer model validation and reproducibility. We present a statistical framework, termed history matching, for performing global parameter search by comparing model output to the observed data. We employ Gaussian process (GP) emulators to produce fast predictions about model behaviour at the arbitrary input parameter settings allowing output uncertainty distributions to be calculated. History matching identifies sets of input parameters that give rise to acceptable matches between observed data and model output given our representation of uncertainties. Modellers could proceed by simulating computer models’ outputs of interest at these identified parameter settings and producing a range of predictions. The variability in model results is crucial for inter-model comparison as well as model development. We illustrate the performance of emulation and history matching on a simple one-dimensional toy model and in application to a climate model. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Reliability and reproducibility in computational science: implementing verification, validation and uncertainty quantification in silico’. The Royal Society Publishing 2021-05-17 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8059558/ /pubmed/33775141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0071 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Volodina, Victoria
Challenor, Peter
The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
title The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
title_full The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
title_fullStr The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
title_short The importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
title_sort importance of uncertainty quantification in model reproducibility
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33775141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0071
work_keys_str_mv AT volodinavictoria theimportanceofuncertaintyquantificationinmodelreproducibility
AT challenorpeter theimportanceofuncertaintyquantificationinmodelreproducibility
AT volodinavictoria importanceofuncertaintyquantificationinmodelreproducibility
AT challenorpeter importanceofuncertaintyquantificationinmodelreproducibility