Cargando…
Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models
There is significant geographic variation in species richness. However, the nature of the underlying relationships, such as that between species richness and environmental stability, remains unclear. The stability-time hypothesis suggests that environmental instability reduces species richness by su...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33878917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0240 |
_version_ | 1783681212498313216 |
---|---|
author | Furness, Euan N. Garwood, Russell J. Mannion, Philip D. Sutton, Mark D. |
author_facet | Furness, Euan N. Garwood, Russell J. Mannion, Philip D. Sutton, Mark D. |
author_sort | Furness, Euan N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is significant geographic variation in species richness. However, the nature of the underlying relationships, such as that between species richness and environmental stability, remains unclear. The stability-time hypothesis suggests that environmental instability reduces species richness by suppressing speciation and increasing extinction risk. By contrast, the patch-mosaic hypothesis suggests that small-scale environmental instability can increase species richness by providing a steady supply of non-equilibrium environments. Although these hypotheses are often applied to different time scales, their core mechanisms are in conflict. Reconciling these apparently competing hypotheses is key to understanding how environmental conditions shape the distribution of biodiversity. Here, we use REvoSim, an individual-based, eco-evolutionary system, to model the evolution of sessile organisms in environments with varying magnitudes and scales of environmental instability. We demonstrate that when environments have substantial permanent heterogeneity, a high level of localized environmental instability reduces biodiversity, whereas in environments lacking permanent heterogeneity, high levels of localized instability increase biodiversity. By contrast, broad-scale environmental instability, acting on the same time scale, invariably reduces biodiversity. Our results provide a new view of the biodiversity–disturbance relationship that reconciles contrasting hypotheses within a single model and implies constraints on the environmental conditions under which those hypotheses apply. These constraints can inform attempts to conserve adaptive potential in different environments during the current biodiversity crisis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8059584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80595842021-05-17 Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models Furness, Euan N. Garwood, Russell J. Mannion, Philip D. Sutton, Mark D. Proc Biol Sci Ecology There is significant geographic variation in species richness. However, the nature of the underlying relationships, such as that between species richness and environmental stability, remains unclear. The stability-time hypothesis suggests that environmental instability reduces species richness by suppressing speciation and increasing extinction risk. By contrast, the patch-mosaic hypothesis suggests that small-scale environmental instability can increase species richness by providing a steady supply of non-equilibrium environments. Although these hypotheses are often applied to different time scales, their core mechanisms are in conflict. Reconciling these apparently competing hypotheses is key to understanding how environmental conditions shape the distribution of biodiversity. Here, we use REvoSim, an individual-based, eco-evolutionary system, to model the evolution of sessile organisms in environments with varying magnitudes and scales of environmental instability. We demonstrate that when environments have substantial permanent heterogeneity, a high level of localized environmental instability reduces biodiversity, whereas in environments lacking permanent heterogeneity, high levels of localized instability increase biodiversity. By contrast, broad-scale environmental instability, acting on the same time scale, invariably reduces biodiversity. Our results provide a new view of the biodiversity–disturbance relationship that reconciles contrasting hypotheses within a single model and implies constraints on the environmental conditions under which those hypotheses apply. These constraints can inform attempts to conserve adaptive potential in different environments during the current biodiversity crisis. The Royal Society 2021-04-28 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8059584/ /pubmed/33878917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0240 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Ecology Furness, Euan N. Garwood, Russell J. Mannion, Philip D. Sutton, Mark D. Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
title | Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
title_full | Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
title_fullStr | Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
title_short | Evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
title_sort | evolutionary simulations clarify and reconcile biodiversity-disturbance models |
topic | Ecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33878917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furnesseuann evolutionarysimulationsclarifyandreconcilebiodiversitydisturbancemodels AT garwoodrussellj evolutionarysimulationsclarifyandreconcilebiodiversitydisturbancemodels AT mannionphilipd evolutionarysimulationsclarifyandreconcilebiodiversitydisturbancemodels AT suttonmarkd evolutionarysimulationsclarifyandreconcilebiodiversitydisturbancemodels |