Cargando…

Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration

Traditionally, resistance and resilience are associated with good ecological health, often underpinning restoration goals. However, degraded ecosystems can also be highly resistant and resilient, making restoration difficult: degraded communities often become dominated by hyper-tolerant species, pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrett, Isabelle C., McIntosh, Angus R., Febria, Catherine M., Warburton, Helen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0354
_version_ 1783681272766267392
author Barrett, Isabelle C.
McIntosh, Angus R.
Febria, Catherine M.
Warburton, Helen J.
author_facet Barrett, Isabelle C.
McIntosh, Angus R.
Febria, Catherine M.
Warburton, Helen J.
author_sort Barrett, Isabelle C.
collection PubMed
description Traditionally, resistance and resilience are associated with good ecological health, often underpinning restoration goals. However, degraded ecosystems can also be highly resistant and resilient, making restoration difficult: degraded communities often become dominated by hyper-tolerant species, preventing recolonization and resulting in low biodiversity and poor ecosystem function. Using streams as a model, we undertook a mesocosm experiment to test if degraded community presence hindered biological recovery. We established 12 mesocosms, simulating physically healthy streams. Degraded invertebrate communities were established in half, mimicking the post-restoration scenario of physical recovery without biological recovery. We then introduced a healthy colonist community to all mesocosms, testing if degraded community presence influenced healthy community establishment. Colonists established less readily in degraded community mesocosms, with larger decreases in abundance of sensitive taxa, likely driven by biotic interactions rather than abiotic constraints. Resource depletion by the degraded community likely increased competition, driving priority effects. Colonists left by drifting, but also by accelerating development, reducing time to emergence but sacrificing larger body size. Since degraded community presence prevented colonist establishment, our experiment suggests successful restoration must address both abiotic and biotic factors, especially those that reinforce the ‘negative’ resistance and resilience which perpetuate degraded communities and are typically overlooked.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8059965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80599652021-05-15 Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration Barrett, Isabelle C. McIntosh, Angus R. Febria, Catherine M. Warburton, Helen J. Proc Biol Sci Ecology Traditionally, resistance and resilience are associated with good ecological health, often underpinning restoration goals. However, degraded ecosystems can also be highly resistant and resilient, making restoration difficult: degraded communities often become dominated by hyper-tolerant species, preventing recolonization and resulting in low biodiversity and poor ecosystem function. Using streams as a model, we undertook a mesocosm experiment to test if degraded community presence hindered biological recovery. We established 12 mesocosms, simulating physically healthy streams. Degraded invertebrate communities were established in half, mimicking the post-restoration scenario of physical recovery without biological recovery. We then introduced a healthy colonist community to all mesocosms, testing if degraded community presence influenced healthy community establishment. Colonists established less readily in degraded community mesocosms, with larger decreases in abundance of sensitive taxa, likely driven by biotic interactions rather than abiotic constraints. Resource depletion by the degraded community likely increased competition, driving priority effects. Colonists left by drifting, but also by accelerating development, reducing time to emergence but sacrificing larger body size. Since degraded community presence prevented colonist establishment, our experiment suggests successful restoration must address both abiotic and biotic factors, especially those that reinforce the ‘negative’ resistance and resilience which perpetuate degraded communities and are typically overlooked. The Royal Society 2021-03-31 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8059965/ /pubmed/33784863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0354 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Barrett, Isabelle C.
McIntosh, Angus R.
Febria, Catherine M.
Warburton, Helen J.
Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
title Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
title_full Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
title_fullStr Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
title_full_unstemmed Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
title_short Negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
title_sort negative resistance and resilience: biotic mechanisms underpin delayed biological recovery in stream restoration
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0354
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettisabellec negativeresistanceandresiliencebioticmechanismsunderpindelayedbiologicalrecoveryinstreamrestoration
AT mcintoshangusr negativeresistanceandresiliencebioticmechanismsunderpindelayedbiologicalrecoveryinstreamrestoration
AT febriacatherinem negativeresistanceandresiliencebioticmechanismsunderpindelayedbiologicalrecoveryinstreamrestoration
AT warburtonhelenj negativeresistanceandresiliencebioticmechanismsunderpindelayedbiologicalrecoveryinstreamrestoration