Cargando…
A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
To broaden and emphasize the educational benefits of research to more biology majors in a course setting, we developed and assessed a microbiology-focused course-based undergraduate research experience that utilizes culture-based bacterial enumeration to compare contamination present on different gr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Microbiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2237 |
_version_ | 1783681304534974464 |
---|---|
author | Boomer, Sarah M. Kumar, Savannah Dutton, Bryan E. |
author_facet | Boomer, Sarah M. Kumar, Savannah Dutton, Bryan E. |
author_sort | Boomer, Sarah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To broaden and emphasize the educational benefits of research to more biology majors in a course setting, we developed and assessed a microbiology-focused course-based undergraduate research experience that utilizes culture-based bacterial enumeration to compare contamination present on different ground beef sources (conventional vs. organic). During the final 3 weeks of the quarter, students learned and practiced common microbiology techniques like dilution math, selective and differential media-based identification, and statistical analysis to evaluate data and test hypotheses. Students were assessed primarily via a formal lab report and a lab practical focused on evaluating process of science and quantitative reasoning skills. The majority of students could write hypotheses and describe variables but were challenged when asked to describe the limitations of the experiments that were conducted as part of this research project. Most students could perform Excel-based graphing and a t test, but many could not solve the complex dilution math required for this project. The greatest barriers to skills mastery represented microbiology-focused concepts, like understanding selective media biases and the nuances of multistep viable counting procedures and outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8060146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society of Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80601462021-05-04 A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning Boomer, Sarah M. Kumar, Savannah Dutton, Bryan E. J Microbiol Biol Educ Curriculum To broaden and emphasize the educational benefits of research to more biology majors in a course setting, we developed and assessed a microbiology-focused course-based undergraduate research experience that utilizes culture-based bacterial enumeration to compare contamination present on different ground beef sources (conventional vs. organic). During the final 3 weeks of the quarter, students learned and practiced common microbiology techniques like dilution math, selective and differential media-based identification, and statistical analysis to evaluate data and test hypotheses. Students were assessed primarily via a formal lab report and a lab practical focused on evaluating process of science and quantitative reasoning skills. The majority of students could write hypotheses and describe variables but were challenged when asked to describe the limitations of the experiments that were conducted as part of this research project. Most students could perform Excel-based graphing and a t test, but many could not solve the complex dilution math required for this project. The greatest barriers to skills mastery represented microbiology-focused concepts, like understanding selective media biases and the nuances of multistep viable counting procedures and outcomes. American Society of Microbiology 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8060146/ /pubmed/33953823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2237 Text en ©2021 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work. |
spellingShingle | Curriculum Boomer, Sarah M. Kumar, Savannah Dutton, Bryan E. A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning |
title | A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning |
title_full | A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning |
title_fullStr | A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning |
title_full_unstemmed | A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning |
title_short | A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning |
title_sort | cure for meat: comparing bacterial contaminants on different ground beef sources emphasizes process of science and quantitative reasoning |
topic | Curriculum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boomersarahm acureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning AT kumarsavannah acureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning AT duttonbryane acureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning AT boomersarahm cureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning AT kumarsavannah cureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning AT duttonbryane cureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning |