Cargando…

A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning

To broaden and emphasize the educational benefits of research to more biology majors in a course setting, we developed and assessed a microbiology-focused course-based undergraduate research experience that utilizes culture-based bacterial enumeration to compare contamination present on different gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boomer, Sarah M., Kumar, Savannah, Dutton, Bryan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2237
_version_ 1783681304534974464
author Boomer, Sarah M.
Kumar, Savannah
Dutton, Bryan E.
author_facet Boomer, Sarah M.
Kumar, Savannah
Dutton, Bryan E.
author_sort Boomer, Sarah M.
collection PubMed
description To broaden and emphasize the educational benefits of research to more biology majors in a course setting, we developed and assessed a microbiology-focused course-based undergraduate research experience that utilizes culture-based bacterial enumeration to compare contamination present on different ground beef sources (conventional vs. organic). During the final 3 weeks of the quarter, students learned and practiced common microbiology techniques like dilution math, selective and differential media-based identification, and statistical analysis to evaluate data and test hypotheses. Students were assessed primarily via a formal lab report and a lab practical focused on evaluating process of science and quantitative reasoning skills. The majority of students could write hypotheses and describe variables but were challenged when asked to describe the limitations of the experiments that were conducted as part of this research project. Most students could perform Excel-based graphing and a t test, but many could not solve the complex dilution math required for this project. The greatest barriers to skills mastery represented microbiology-focused concepts, like understanding selective media biases and the nuances of multistep viable counting procedures and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society of Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80601462021-05-04 A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning Boomer, Sarah M. Kumar, Savannah Dutton, Bryan E. J Microbiol Biol Educ Curriculum To broaden and emphasize the educational benefits of research to more biology majors in a course setting, we developed and assessed a microbiology-focused course-based undergraduate research experience that utilizes culture-based bacterial enumeration to compare contamination present on different ground beef sources (conventional vs. organic). During the final 3 weeks of the quarter, students learned and practiced common microbiology techniques like dilution math, selective and differential media-based identification, and statistical analysis to evaluate data and test hypotheses. Students were assessed primarily via a formal lab report and a lab practical focused on evaluating process of science and quantitative reasoning skills. The majority of students could write hypotheses and describe variables but were challenged when asked to describe the limitations of the experiments that were conducted as part of this research project. Most students could perform Excel-based graphing and a t test, but many could not solve the complex dilution math required for this project. The greatest barriers to skills mastery represented microbiology-focused concepts, like understanding selective media biases and the nuances of multistep viable counting procedures and outcomes. American Society of Microbiology 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8060146/ /pubmed/33953823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2237 Text en ©2021 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.
spellingShingle Curriculum
Boomer, Sarah M.
Kumar, Savannah
Dutton, Bryan E.
A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
title A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
title_full A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
title_fullStr A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
title_full_unstemmed A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
title_short A CURE for Meat: Comparing Bacterial Contaminants on Different Ground Beef Sources Emphasizes Process of Science and Quantitative Reasoning
title_sort cure for meat: comparing bacterial contaminants on different ground beef sources emphasizes process of science and quantitative reasoning
topic Curriculum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2237
work_keys_str_mv AT boomersarahm acureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning
AT kumarsavannah acureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning
AT duttonbryane acureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning
AT boomersarahm cureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning
AT kumarsavannah cureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning
AT duttonbryane cureformeatcomparingbacterialcontaminantsondifferentgroundbeefsourcesemphasizesprocessofscienceandquantitativereasoning