Cargando…

Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of mechanical debridement and/or air polishing on the healing of ligature-induced buccal periimplantitis dehiscence defects in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight implants were placed in the mandibles of twelve beagle dogs, and periimplantitis was induce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solderer, Alex, Pippenger, Benjamin E., Donnet, Marcel, Wiedemeier, Daniel, Ramenzoni, Liza L., Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03572-2
_version_ 1783681307308457984
author Solderer, Alex
Pippenger, Benjamin E.
Donnet, Marcel
Wiedemeier, Daniel
Ramenzoni, Liza L.
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
author_facet Solderer, Alex
Pippenger, Benjamin E.
Donnet, Marcel
Wiedemeier, Daniel
Ramenzoni, Liza L.
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
author_sort Solderer, Alex
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of mechanical debridement and/or air polishing on the healing of ligature-induced buccal periimplantitis dehiscence defects in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight implants were placed in the mandibles of twelve beagle dogs, and periimplantitis was induced for 2 months using ligatures. The resulting buccal dehiscence-type defects were surgically cleaned and augmented (xenogenic filler and resorbable membrane) according to one of the following treatments: (1) Cleaning with carbon curette (debridement - D) and guided bone regeneration (GBR/G): DG, (2) air polishing cleaning (A) and GBR: AG, (3) a combination of D/A/G: DAG, and (4) D/A without GBR: DA. After 2 months, histomorphometric and inflammatory evaluations were conducted. RESULTS: The median bone gain after therapy ranged between 1.2 mm (DG) and 2.7 mm (AG). Relative bone gain was between 39% (DG) and 59% (AG). The lowest inflammation scores were obtained in DA without GBR (5.84), whereas significantly higher values between 8.2 and 9.4 were found in the groups with augmentation. At lingual sites without defects, scores ranged from 4.1 to 5.9. According to ISO, differences above 2.9 were considered representative for irritative properties. CONCLUSIONS: All treatments resulted in partial regeneration of the defects. No treatment group showed a significantly (p < 0.05) better outcome. However, pretreatment with air polishing showed a tendency for less inflammation. Noteworthy, inflammation assessment showed an overall irritative potential after GBR in the evaluated early healing phase. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Periimplantitis treatment still represents a big issue in daily practice and requires additional preclinical research in order to improve treatment concepts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80601712021-05-05 Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs Solderer, Alex Pippenger, Benjamin E. Donnet, Marcel Wiedemeier, Daniel Ramenzoni, Liza L. Schmidlin, Patrick R. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of mechanical debridement and/or air polishing on the healing of ligature-induced buccal periimplantitis dehiscence defects in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight implants were placed in the mandibles of twelve beagle dogs, and periimplantitis was induced for 2 months using ligatures. The resulting buccal dehiscence-type defects were surgically cleaned and augmented (xenogenic filler and resorbable membrane) according to one of the following treatments: (1) Cleaning with carbon curette (debridement - D) and guided bone regeneration (GBR/G): DG, (2) air polishing cleaning (A) and GBR: AG, (3) a combination of D/A/G: DAG, and (4) D/A without GBR: DA. After 2 months, histomorphometric and inflammatory evaluations were conducted. RESULTS: The median bone gain after therapy ranged between 1.2 mm (DG) and 2.7 mm (AG). Relative bone gain was between 39% (DG) and 59% (AG). The lowest inflammation scores were obtained in DA without GBR (5.84), whereas significantly higher values between 8.2 and 9.4 were found in the groups with augmentation. At lingual sites without defects, scores ranged from 4.1 to 5.9. According to ISO, differences above 2.9 were considered representative for irritative properties. CONCLUSIONS: All treatments resulted in partial regeneration of the defects. No treatment group showed a significantly (p < 0.05) better outcome. However, pretreatment with air polishing showed a tendency for less inflammation. Noteworthy, inflammation assessment showed an overall irritative potential after GBR in the evaluated early healing phase. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Periimplantitis treatment still represents a big issue in daily practice and requires additional preclinical research in order to improve treatment concepts. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8060171/ /pubmed/32914269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03572-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Solderer, Alex
Pippenger, Benjamin E.
Donnet, Marcel
Wiedemeier, Daniel
Ramenzoni, Liza L.
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
title Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
title_full Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
title_fullStr Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
title_short Evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
title_sort evaluation of air polishing with a sterile powder and mechanical debridement during regenerative surgical periimplantitis treatment: a study in dogs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03572-2
work_keys_str_mv AT soldereralex evaluationofairpolishingwithasterilepowderandmechanicaldebridementduringregenerativesurgicalperiimplantitistreatmentastudyindogs
AT pippengerbenjamine evaluationofairpolishingwithasterilepowderandmechanicaldebridementduringregenerativesurgicalperiimplantitistreatmentastudyindogs
AT donnetmarcel evaluationofairpolishingwithasterilepowderandmechanicaldebridementduringregenerativesurgicalperiimplantitistreatmentastudyindogs
AT wiedemeierdaniel evaluationofairpolishingwithasterilepowderandmechanicaldebridementduringregenerativesurgicalperiimplantitistreatmentastudyindogs
AT ramenzonilizal evaluationofairpolishingwithasterilepowderandmechanicaldebridementduringregenerativesurgicalperiimplantitistreatmentastudyindogs
AT schmidlinpatrickr evaluationofairpolishingwithasterilepowderandmechanicaldebridementduringregenerativesurgicalperiimplantitistreatmentastudyindogs