Cargando…

Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives

OBJECTIVES: The biocompatibility of methacrylate-based adhesives is a topic that is intensively discussed in dentistry. Since only limited evidence concerning the cyto- and genotoxicity of orthodontic adhesives is available, the aim of this study was to measure the genotoxic potential of seven ortho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taubmann, Andreas, Willershausen, Ines, Walter, Christian, Al-Maawi, Sarah, Kaina, Bernd, Gölz, Lina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03569-x
_version_ 1783681313196212224
author Taubmann, Andreas
Willershausen, Ines
Walter, Christian
Al-Maawi, Sarah
Kaina, Bernd
Gölz, Lina
author_facet Taubmann, Andreas
Willershausen, Ines
Walter, Christian
Al-Maawi, Sarah
Kaina, Bernd
Gölz, Lina
author_sort Taubmann, Andreas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The biocompatibility of methacrylate-based adhesives is a topic that is intensively discussed in dentistry. Since only limited evidence concerning the cyto- and genotoxicity of orthodontic adhesives is available, the aim of this study was to measure the genotoxic potential of seven orthodontic methacrylate-based adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The XTT assay was utilized to determine the cytotoxicity of Assure Plus, Assure Bonding Resin, ExciTE F, OptiBond Solo Plus, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, Transbond MIP, and Transbond XT after an incubation period of 24 h on human gingival fibroblasts. We also performed the γH2AX assay to explore the genotoxic potential of the adhesives within cytotoxic dose ranges after an incubation period of 6 h. RESULTS: The XTT assay showed a concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability. The decrease in cellular viability was in the same dose range most significant for Assure Plus, rendering it the adhesive material with the highest cytotoxicity. Employing the γH2AX assay, a concentration-dependent increase in H2AX phosphorylation was detected, indicating induction of DNA damage. CONCLUSIONS: For most products, a linear correlation between the material concentration and γH2AX foci was observed. The most severe effect on γH2AX focus induction was found for Transbond MIP, which was the only adhesive in the test group containing the co-initiator diphenyliodonium hexafluorophosphate (DPIHP). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data indicate that orthodontic adhesives, notably Transbond MIP, bear a genotoxic potential. Since the study was performed with in vitro cultivated cells, a direct translation of the findings to in vivo exposure conditions should be considered with great diligence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80602032021-05-05 Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives Taubmann, Andreas Willershausen, Ines Walter, Christian Al-Maawi, Sarah Kaina, Bernd Gölz, Lina Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The biocompatibility of methacrylate-based adhesives is a topic that is intensively discussed in dentistry. Since only limited evidence concerning the cyto- and genotoxicity of orthodontic adhesives is available, the aim of this study was to measure the genotoxic potential of seven orthodontic methacrylate-based adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The XTT assay was utilized to determine the cytotoxicity of Assure Plus, Assure Bonding Resin, ExciTE F, OptiBond Solo Plus, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, Transbond MIP, and Transbond XT after an incubation period of 24 h on human gingival fibroblasts. We also performed the γH2AX assay to explore the genotoxic potential of the adhesives within cytotoxic dose ranges after an incubation period of 6 h. RESULTS: The XTT assay showed a concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability. The decrease in cellular viability was in the same dose range most significant for Assure Plus, rendering it the adhesive material with the highest cytotoxicity. Employing the γH2AX assay, a concentration-dependent increase in H2AX phosphorylation was detected, indicating induction of DNA damage. CONCLUSIONS: For most products, a linear correlation between the material concentration and γH2AX foci was observed. The most severe effect on γH2AX focus induction was found for Transbond MIP, which was the only adhesive in the test group containing the co-initiator diphenyliodonium hexafluorophosphate (DPIHP). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data indicate that orthodontic adhesives, notably Transbond MIP, bear a genotoxic potential. Since the study was performed with in vitro cultivated cells, a direct translation of the findings to in vivo exposure conditions should be considered with great diligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8060203/ /pubmed/32970196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03569-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Taubmann, Andreas
Willershausen, Ines
Walter, Christian
Al-Maawi, Sarah
Kaina, Bernd
Gölz, Lina
Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
title Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
title_full Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
title_fullStr Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
title_full_unstemmed Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
title_short Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
title_sort genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of methacrylate-based orthodontic adhesives
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03569-x
work_keys_str_mv AT taubmannandreas genotoxicandcytotoxicpotentialofmethacrylatebasedorthodonticadhesives
AT willershausenines genotoxicandcytotoxicpotentialofmethacrylatebasedorthodonticadhesives
AT walterchristian genotoxicandcytotoxicpotentialofmethacrylatebasedorthodonticadhesives
AT almaawisarah genotoxicandcytotoxicpotentialofmethacrylatebasedorthodonticadhesives
AT kainabernd genotoxicandcytotoxicpotentialofmethacrylatebasedorthodonticadhesives
AT golzlina genotoxicandcytotoxicpotentialofmethacrylatebasedorthodonticadhesives