Cargando…
Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study
PURPOSE: Endovascular robotics is an emerging technology within the developing field of medical robotics. This was a prospective evaluation to assess safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of carotid artery stenting cases performe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02759-0 |
_version_ | 1783681314127347712 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Ben Riga, Celia Bicknell, Colin Hamady, Mohamad |
author_facet | Jones, Ben Riga, Celia Bicknell, Colin Hamady, Mohamad |
author_sort | Jones, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Endovascular robotics is an emerging technology within the developing field of medical robotics. This was a prospective evaluation to assess safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of carotid artery stenting cases performed over period of 24 months, from May 2015 to October 2016, using the Magellan Robotic System (Hansen, Mountain View, CA) were included. All cases utilised the robotic system to navigate the arch, obtain a stable position in the common carotid artery, followed by manual manipulation of Embolic Protection Devices and self-expandable stents through the robotic catheter. Patients demographics, clinical indications, anatomical features, technical and clinical success, complication rate and hospital stay were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen patients, 10 males (78.5%), with an average age of 68.7 years were treated. Mean follow up time was 30 months. Ten patients (91%) were symptomatic at presentation. Anatomical indications for endovascular stent insertion were previous open surgery to the neck ± radiotherapy (87.5%) and hostile anatomy for open surgery (12.5%). Technical success was 100% and the robotic system demonstrates enhanced stability during arch and lesion crossing. There were no neurological complications post-operatively. Average hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–6 days) and a change in serum creatinine of −7.8 μmol/L. There was no documented case of in stent restenosis, new or worsening neurology during follow-up. CONCLUSION: These results illustrate safety and feasibility of robotic endovascular revascularisation for carotid disease and demonstrates potential to enhance peri-procedural safety through improved control and stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8060210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80602102021-05-05 Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study Jones, Ben Riga, Celia Bicknell, Colin Hamady, Mohamad Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Technical Note PURPOSE: Endovascular robotics is an emerging technology within the developing field of medical robotics. This was a prospective evaluation to assess safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of carotid artery stenting cases performed over period of 24 months, from May 2015 to October 2016, using the Magellan Robotic System (Hansen, Mountain View, CA) were included. All cases utilised the robotic system to navigate the arch, obtain a stable position in the common carotid artery, followed by manual manipulation of Embolic Protection Devices and self-expandable stents through the robotic catheter. Patients demographics, clinical indications, anatomical features, technical and clinical success, complication rate and hospital stay were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen patients, 10 males (78.5%), with an average age of 68.7 years were treated. Mean follow up time was 30 months. Ten patients (91%) were symptomatic at presentation. Anatomical indications for endovascular stent insertion were previous open surgery to the neck ± radiotherapy (87.5%) and hostile anatomy for open surgery (12.5%). Technical success was 100% and the robotic system demonstrates enhanced stability during arch and lesion crossing. There were no neurological complications post-operatively. Average hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–6 days) and a change in serum creatinine of −7.8 μmol/L. There was no documented case of in stent restenosis, new or worsening neurology during follow-up. CONCLUSION: These results illustrate safety and feasibility of robotic endovascular revascularisation for carotid disease and demonstrates potential to enhance peri-procedural safety through improved control and stability. Springer US 2021-01-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8060210/ /pubmed/33447924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02759-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Jones, Ben Riga, Celia Bicknell, Colin Hamady, Mohamad Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study |
title | Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study |
title_full | Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study |
title_fullStr | Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study |
title_short | Robot-Assisted Carotid Artery Stenting: A Safety and Feasibility Study |
title_sort | robot-assisted carotid artery stenting: a safety and feasibility study |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02759-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesben robotassistedcarotidarterystentingasafetyandfeasibilitystudy AT rigacelia robotassistedcarotidarterystentingasafetyandfeasibilitystudy AT bicknellcolin robotassistedcarotidarterystentingasafetyandfeasibilitystudy AT hamadymohamad robotassistedcarotidarterystentingasafetyandfeasibilitystudy |