Cargando…

Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study

Background: Formal thought disorder was constitutively linked to the original concept of schizophrenia and has since been one of central features supporting its diagnosis. Bleuler considered formal thought disorder as a fundamental symptom of schizophrenia among other fundamental symptoms, including...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordgaard, Julie, Gravesen-Jensen, Mette, Buch-Pedersen, Marlene, Parnas, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897496
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640921
_version_ 1783681375592775680
author Nordgaard, Julie
Gravesen-Jensen, Mette
Buch-Pedersen, Marlene
Parnas, Josef
author_facet Nordgaard, Julie
Gravesen-Jensen, Mette
Buch-Pedersen, Marlene
Parnas, Josef
author_sort Nordgaard, Julie
collection PubMed
description Background: Formal thought disorder was constitutively linked to the original concept of schizophrenia and has since been one of central features supporting its diagnosis. Bleuler considered formal thought disorder as a fundamental symptom of schizophrenia among other fundamental symptoms, including ego disorders. The contemporary concept of self-disorder represents a more developed, nuanced, and systematic approach to disturbances of self-experience than the Bleulerian concept of ego disorders. As fundamental symptoms, on Bleuler's account, are persistently present in every case, an association between these symptoms could be expected. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between self-disorder and formal thought disorder. Methods: A sample of 94 diagnostically heterogeneous patients was examined for formal thought disorder using clinical rating and a proverb test. The proverb test was analyzed for two different aspects of formal thought disorder: literal responses and bizarre responses. The sample was comprehensively assessed for psychopathology, including self-disorder as measured with the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience scale. Results: The patients, who provided bizarre responses, had a higher level of self-disorder, more negative symptoms, lower level of social functioning, and lower level of intelligence. Bizarre answers aggregated in patients diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum compared with patients outside the schizophrenia spectrum. We found moderate correlations between the two measures of formal thought disorder (clinically rated and bizarre responses) and self-disorder (0.454 [p < 0.01] and 0.328 [p < 0.01]). Literal responses did not differ between diagnostic groups and also did not correlate with bizarre responses. Specificity of bizarre responses for a diagnosis within schizophrenia spectrum was 86.89%, whereas sensitivity was 40.85%. Conclusion: The close relation between formal thought disorder and self-disorder further adds to the notion of self-disorder as a unifying psychopathological core beneath the apparently heterogeneous symptoms of schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80604942021-04-23 Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study Nordgaard, Julie Gravesen-Jensen, Mette Buch-Pedersen, Marlene Parnas, Josef Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Formal thought disorder was constitutively linked to the original concept of schizophrenia and has since been one of central features supporting its diagnosis. Bleuler considered formal thought disorder as a fundamental symptom of schizophrenia among other fundamental symptoms, including ego disorders. The contemporary concept of self-disorder represents a more developed, nuanced, and systematic approach to disturbances of self-experience than the Bleulerian concept of ego disorders. As fundamental symptoms, on Bleuler's account, are persistently present in every case, an association between these symptoms could be expected. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between self-disorder and formal thought disorder. Methods: A sample of 94 diagnostically heterogeneous patients was examined for formal thought disorder using clinical rating and a proverb test. The proverb test was analyzed for two different aspects of formal thought disorder: literal responses and bizarre responses. The sample was comprehensively assessed for psychopathology, including self-disorder as measured with the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience scale. Results: The patients, who provided bizarre responses, had a higher level of self-disorder, more negative symptoms, lower level of social functioning, and lower level of intelligence. Bizarre answers aggregated in patients diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum compared with patients outside the schizophrenia spectrum. We found moderate correlations between the two measures of formal thought disorder (clinically rated and bizarre responses) and self-disorder (0.454 [p < 0.01] and 0.328 [p < 0.01]). Literal responses did not differ between diagnostic groups and also did not correlate with bizarre responses. Specificity of bizarre responses for a diagnosis within schizophrenia spectrum was 86.89%, whereas sensitivity was 40.85%. Conclusion: The close relation between formal thought disorder and self-disorder further adds to the notion of self-disorder as a unifying psychopathological core beneath the apparently heterogeneous symptoms of schizophrenia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8060494/ /pubmed/33897496 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640921 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nordgaard, Gravesen-Jensen, Buch-Pedersen and Parnas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Nordgaard, Julie
Gravesen-Jensen, Mette
Buch-Pedersen, Marlene
Parnas, Josef
Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study
title Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study
title_full Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study
title_fullStr Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study
title_full_unstemmed Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study
title_short Formal Thought Disorder and Self-Disorder: An Empirical Study
title_sort formal thought disorder and self-disorder: an empirical study
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897496
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640921
work_keys_str_mv AT nordgaardjulie formalthoughtdisorderandselfdisorderanempiricalstudy
AT gravesenjensenmette formalthoughtdisorderandselfdisorderanempiricalstudy
AT buchpedersenmarlene formalthoughtdisorderandselfdisorderanempiricalstudy
AT parnasjosef formalthoughtdisorderandselfdisorderanempiricalstudy