Cargando…
Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada
Cats represent a potential source of Coxiella burnetii, the aetiological agent of Q fever in humans. The prevalence and risk factors of C. burnetii infection in farm, pet and feral cats were studied in Quebec, Canada, using a cross-sectional study. Serum samples were tested using a specific enzyme-l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33583452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000364 |
_version_ | 1783681443739729920 |
---|---|
author | Cyr, J. Turcotte, M.-È. Desrosiers, A. Bélanger, D. Harel, J. Tremblay, D. Leboeuf, A. Gagnon, C. A. Côté, J.-C. Arsenault, J. |
author_facet | Cyr, J. Turcotte, M.-È. Desrosiers, A. Bélanger, D. Harel, J. Tremblay, D. Leboeuf, A. Gagnon, C. A. Côté, J.-C. Arsenault, J. |
author_sort | Cyr, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cats represent a potential source of Coxiella burnetii, the aetiological agent of Q fever in humans. The prevalence and risk factors of C. burnetii infection in farm, pet and feral cats were studied in Quebec, Canada, using a cross-sectional study. Serum samples were tested using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii, whereas rectal swabs were assayed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the molecular detection of the bacteria. Potential risk factors for farm cats were investigated using clinical examinations, questionnaires and results from a concurrent study on C. burnetii farm status. A total of 184 cats were tested: 59 from ruminant farms, 73 pets and 52 feral cats. Among farm cats, 2/59 (3.4%) were ELISA-positive, 3/59 (5.1%) were ELISA-doubtful and 1/59 (1.7%) was qPCR-positive. All pets and feral cats were negative to C. burnetii ELISA and qPCR. Farm cat positivity was associated with a positive C. burnetii status on the ruminant farm (prevalence ratio = 7.6, P = 0.03). Our results suggest that although pet and feral cats do not seem to pose a great C. burnetii risk to public health, more active care should be taken when in contact with cats from ruminant farms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8060820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80608202021-05-05 Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada Cyr, J. Turcotte, M.-È. Desrosiers, A. Bélanger, D. Harel, J. Tremblay, D. Leboeuf, A. Gagnon, C. A. Côté, J.-C. Arsenault, J. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Cats represent a potential source of Coxiella burnetii, the aetiological agent of Q fever in humans. The prevalence and risk factors of C. burnetii infection in farm, pet and feral cats were studied in Quebec, Canada, using a cross-sectional study. Serum samples were tested using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii, whereas rectal swabs were assayed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the molecular detection of the bacteria. Potential risk factors for farm cats were investigated using clinical examinations, questionnaires and results from a concurrent study on C. burnetii farm status. A total of 184 cats were tested: 59 from ruminant farms, 73 pets and 52 feral cats. Among farm cats, 2/59 (3.4%) were ELISA-positive, 3/59 (5.1%) were ELISA-doubtful and 1/59 (1.7%) was qPCR-positive. All pets and feral cats were negative to C. burnetii ELISA and qPCR. Farm cat positivity was associated with a positive C. burnetii status on the ruminant farm (prevalence ratio = 7.6, P = 0.03). Our results suggest that although pet and feral cats do not seem to pose a great C. burnetii risk to public health, more active care should be taken when in contact with cats from ruminant farms. Cambridge University Press 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8060820/ /pubmed/33583452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000364 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cyr, J. Turcotte, M.-È. Desrosiers, A. Bélanger, D. Harel, J. Tremblay, D. Leboeuf, A. Gagnon, C. A. Côté, J.-C. Arsenault, J. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada |
title | Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada |
title_full | Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada |
title_short | Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada |
title_sort | prevalence of coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in quebec, canada |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33583452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cyrj prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT turcotteme prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT desrosiersa prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT belangerd prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT harelj prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT tremblayd prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT leboeufa prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT gagnonca prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT cotejc prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada AT arsenaultj prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiiseropositivityandsheddinginfarmpetandferalcatsandassociatedriskfactorsinfarmcatsinquebeccanada |