Cargando…

One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma

PURPOSE: Retrospective case series evaluating the efficacy and safety of implanting XtraFocus(™) pinhole device in pseudophakic patients with irregular corneal astigmatism with concurrent or standalone iris defect. METHODS: Electronic case records were searched for: uncorrected distance visual acuit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Vivian W. M., Elalfy, Mohamed, Hamada, Samer, Lake, Damian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01537-7
_version_ 1783681456236658688
author Ho, Vivian W. M.
Elalfy, Mohamed
Hamada, Samer
Lake, Damian
author_facet Ho, Vivian W. M.
Elalfy, Mohamed
Hamada, Samer
Lake, Damian
author_sort Ho, Vivian W. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Retrospective case series evaluating the efficacy and safety of implanting XtraFocus(™) pinhole device in pseudophakic patients with irregular corneal astigmatism with concurrent or standalone iris defect. METHODS: Electronic case records were searched for: uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), automatic or manifest refraction and spherical equivalent (SE). All main outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, along with patients’ satisfactory outcome and complications. RESULTS: Eleven pseudophakic eyes of 11 patients with a mean age of 54 (range 27–81) years were included. Median UDVA improved significantly from logMAR 0.7 (range 0.1–1.22) pre-operatively to 0.4 (range 0–1.3) at 1-month (p = 0.002); median CDVA remained unchanged at logMAR 0.4 (range 0–0.1) pre-operatively and 0.4 (range 0–0.8) at 1-month (p = 0.36). There were no significant statistical differences in both UDVA and CDVA between the post-operative periods. Ten patients (90.9%) had initial UDVA improvement at 1-month post op. Eight (72.7%) patients expressed satisfaction with improved vision or reduction of glare/halos. Three (27.3%) patients had unsatisfactory visual outcome resulting in 2 requested for implant explantation due to worsening of glare and distressing floaters. CONCLUSIONS: XtraFocus(™) is effective in improving vision or reducing glare in pseudophakic patients with irregular corneal astigmatism or intragenic iris trauma, with over 70% expressed satisfactory outcome. Disturbing floaters and glare preclude its use in some resulting in implant explantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80609032021-04-22 One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma Ho, Vivian W. M. Elalfy, Mohamed Hamada, Samer Lake, Damian Eye (Lond) Article PURPOSE: Retrospective case series evaluating the efficacy and safety of implanting XtraFocus(™) pinhole device in pseudophakic patients with irregular corneal astigmatism with concurrent or standalone iris defect. METHODS: Electronic case records were searched for: uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), automatic or manifest refraction and spherical equivalent (SE). All main outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, along with patients’ satisfactory outcome and complications. RESULTS: Eleven pseudophakic eyes of 11 patients with a mean age of 54 (range 27–81) years were included. Median UDVA improved significantly from logMAR 0.7 (range 0.1–1.22) pre-operatively to 0.4 (range 0–1.3) at 1-month (p = 0.002); median CDVA remained unchanged at logMAR 0.4 (range 0–0.1) pre-operatively and 0.4 (range 0–0.8) at 1-month (p = 0.36). There were no significant statistical differences in both UDVA and CDVA between the post-operative periods. Ten patients (90.9%) had initial UDVA improvement at 1-month post op. Eight (72.7%) patients expressed satisfaction with improved vision or reduction of glare/halos. Three (27.3%) patients had unsatisfactory visual outcome resulting in 2 requested for implant explantation due to worsening of glare and distressing floaters. CONCLUSIONS: XtraFocus(™) is effective in improving vision or reducing glare in pseudophakic patients with irregular corneal astigmatism or intragenic iris trauma, with over 70% expressed satisfactory outcome. Disturbing floaters and glare preclude its use in some resulting in implant explantation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-22 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8060903/ /pubmed/33888865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01537-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2021
spellingShingle Article
Ho, Vivian W. M.
Elalfy, Mohamed
Hamada, Samer
Lake, Damian
One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
title One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
title_full One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
title_fullStr One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
title_full_unstemmed One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
title_short One-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
title_sort one-year visual outcome of secondary piggyback pinhole device implantation in pseudophakic eyes with irregular corneal astigmatism and iris trauma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01537-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hovivianwm oneyearvisualoutcomeofsecondarypiggybackpinholedeviceimplantationinpseudophakiceyeswithirregularcornealastigmatismandiristrauma
AT elalfymohamed oneyearvisualoutcomeofsecondarypiggybackpinholedeviceimplantationinpseudophakiceyeswithirregularcornealastigmatismandiristrauma
AT hamadasamer oneyearvisualoutcomeofsecondarypiggybackpinholedeviceimplantationinpseudophakiceyeswithirregularcornealastigmatismandiristrauma
AT lakedamian oneyearvisualoutcomeofsecondarypiggybackpinholedeviceimplantationinpseudophakiceyeswithirregularcornealastigmatismandiristrauma