Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study

AIM: To assess the antimicrobial activity of probiotics SK12 and SM18 on Streptococcus mutans and also to compare the antimicrobial activity of SK12 and SM18. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic strains of Streptococcus mutans were used to study the antimicrobial activity of probiotics SK12 and SM18 us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrasekhar, Srihari Nirguna, Mallikarjun, Shanthala B, Salim, Henna P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976484
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1838
_version_ 1783681465402261504
author Chandrasekhar, Srihari Nirguna
Mallikarjun, Shanthala B
Salim, Henna P
author_facet Chandrasekhar, Srihari Nirguna
Mallikarjun, Shanthala B
Salim, Henna P
author_sort Chandrasekhar, Srihari Nirguna
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the antimicrobial activity of probiotics SK12 and SM18 on Streptococcus mutans and also to compare the antimicrobial activity of SK12 and SM18. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic strains of Streptococcus mutans were used to study the antimicrobial activity of probiotics SK12 and SM18 using various tests such as disk diffusion, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). In disk diffusion, the zone of inhibition was measured to assess the antimicrobial activity. Chlorhexidine was used as a control for this test. The MIC and MBC were assessed at different dilutions of the probiotic sample (100 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, 25 mg/mL, 12.5 mg/mL, 6.25 mg/mL, 3.12 mg/mL, 1.6 mg/mL, 0.8 mg/mL, 0.4 mg/mL, and 0.2 mg/mL). RESULT: SM18 demonstrated 20 mm of zone of inhibition, whereas SK12 demonstrated 15 mm showing a less antibacterial activity in comparison to SM18. SM18 was found to be bactericidal and effective at a minimum concentration of 0.8 mg/mL, whereas SK12 was bactericidal and effective at a minimum concentration of 1.6 mg/mL. CONCLUSION: Probiotics demonstrate antibacterial activity against cariogenic microflora. SM is 18 having a better antibacterial activity at lower concentrations than SK12 in reducing cariogenic microorganisms. Clinical significance: BLIS K12 and M18 both demonstrated an antibacterial effect on Streptococcus mutans, wherein the use of probiotic in caries prevention is found to be limited. Hence, it is suggestive to reap the bacterial effects of BLIS K12 and M18 in caries prevention. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Chandrasekhar SN, Mallikarjun SB, Salim HP. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(6):611–616.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80609482021-05-10 Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study Chandrasekhar, Srihari Nirguna Mallikarjun, Shanthala B Salim, Henna P Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: To assess the antimicrobial activity of probiotics SK12 and SM18 on Streptococcus mutans and also to compare the antimicrobial activity of SK12 and SM18. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic strains of Streptococcus mutans were used to study the antimicrobial activity of probiotics SK12 and SM18 using various tests such as disk diffusion, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). In disk diffusion, the zone of inhibition was measured to assess the antimicrobial activity. Chlorhexidine was used as a control for this test. The MIC and MBC were assessed at different dilutions of the probiotic sample (100 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, 25 mg/mL, 12.5 mg/mL, 6.25 mg/mL, 3.12 mg/mL, 1.6 mg/mL, 0.8 mg/mL, 0.4 mg/mL, and 0.2 mg/mL). RESULT: SM18 demonstrated 20 mm of zone of inhibition, whereas SK12 demonstrated 15 mm showing a less antibacterial activity in comparison to SM18. SM18 was found to be bactericidal and effective at a minimum concentration of 0.8 mg/mL, whereas SK12 was bactericidal and effective at a minimum concentration of 1.6 mg/mL. CONCLUSION: Probiotics demonstrate antibacterial activity against cariogenic microflora. SM is 18 having a better antibacterial activity at lower concentrations than SK12 in reducing cariogenic microorganisms. Clinical significance: BLIS K12 and M18 both demonstrated an antibacterial effect on Streptococcus mutans, wherein the use of probiotic in caries prevention is found to be limited. Hence, it is suggestive to reap the bacterial effects of BLIS K12 and M18 in caries prevention. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Chandrasekhar SN, Mallikarjun SB, Salim HP. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(6):611–616. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8060948/ /pubmed/33976484 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1838 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chandrasekhar, Srihari Nirguna
Mallikarjun, Shanthala B
Salim, Henna P
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Probiotics SK12 and SM18: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of probiotics sk12 and sm18: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976484
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1838
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekharsriharinirguna comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityofprobioticssk12andsm18aninvitrostudy
AT mallikarjunshanthalab comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityofprobioticssk12andsm18aninvitrostudy
AT salimhennap comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityofprobioticssk12andsm18aninvitrostudy