Cargando…

Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view

PURPOSE: Dosimetric treatment planning evaluations concerning patient-adapted moulds for iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy are presented in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with perinasal skin tumors were treated with individual moulds made of biocompatible epithetic materials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scherf, Christian, Licher, Jörg, Mletzko, Christina, Trommel, Martin, Tselis, Nikolaos, Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios, Diefenhardt, Markus, Rödel, Claus, Köhn, Janett, Ramm, Ulla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897792
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.105286
_version_ 1783681466573520896
author Scherf, Christian
Licher, Jörg
Mletzko, Christina
Trommel, Martin
Tselis, Nikolaos
Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
Diefenhardt, Markus
Rödel, Claus
Köhn, Janett
Ramm, Ulla
author_facet Scherf, Christian
Licher, Jörg
Mletzko, Christina
Trommel, Martin
Tselis, Nikolaos
Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
Diefenhardt, Markus
Rödel, Claus
Köhn, Janett
Ramm, Ulla
author_sort Scherf, Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dosimetric treatment planning evaluations concerning patient-adapted moulds for iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy are presented in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with perinasal skin tumors were treated with individual moulds made of biocompatible epithetic materials with embedded plastic applicators. Treatment plans were optimized with regard to clinical requirements, and dose was calculated using standard water-based TG-43 formalism. In addition, retrospective material-dependent collapsed cone calculations according to TG-186 protocol were evaluated to quantify the limitations of TG-43 protocol for this superficial brachytherapy technique. RESULTS: The dose-volume parameters D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the planning target volumes (PTVs) for TG-43 dose calculations yielded 92.2% to 102.5%, 75.1% to 93.1%, and 7.4% to 41.7% of the prescribed dose, respectively. The max- imum overall dose to the ipsilateral eyeball as the most affected organ at risk (OAR) varied between 8.9 and 36.4 Gy. TG-186 calculations with Hounsfield unit-based density allocation resulted in down by –6.4%, –16.7%, and –30.0% lower average D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the PTVs, with respect to the TG-43 data. The corresponding calculated OAR doses were also lower. The model-based TG-186 dose calculations have considered reduced backscattering due to environmental air as well as the dose-to-medium influenced by the mould materials and tissue composition. The median PTV dose was robust within 0.5% for simulated variations of mould material densities in the range of 1.0 g/cm(3) to 1.26 g/cm(3) up to 7 mm total mould thickness. CONCLUSIONS: HDR contact BT with individual moulds is a safe modality for routine treatment of perinasal skin tumors. The technique provides good target coverage and OARs’ protection, while being robust against small variances in mould material density. Model-based dose calculations (TG-186) should complement TG-43 dose calculations for verification purpose and quality improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8060955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80609552021-04-23 Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view Scherf, Christian Licher, Jörg Mletzko, Christina Trommel, Martin Tselis, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios Diefenhardt, Markus Rödel, Claus Köhn, Janett Ramm, Ulla J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Dosimetric treatment planning evaluations concerning patient-adapted moulds for iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy are presented in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with perinasal skin tumors were treated with individual moulds made of biocompatible epithetic materials with embedded plastic applicators. Treatment plans were optimized with regard to clinical requirements, and dose was calculated using standard water-based TG-43 formalism. In addition, retrospective material-dependent collapsed cone calculations according to TG-186 protocol were evaluated to quantify the limitations of TG-43 protocol for this superficial brachytherapy technique. RESULTS: The dose-volume parameters D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the planning target volumes (PTVs) for TG-43 dose calculations yielded 92.2% to 102.5%, 75.1% to 93.1%, and 7.4% to 41.7% of the prescribed dose, respectively. The max- imum overall dose to the ipsilateral eyeball as the most affected organ at risk (OAR) varied between 8.9 and 36.4 Gy. TG-186 calculations with Hounsfield unit-based density allocation resulted in down by –6.4%, –16.7%, and –30.0% lower average D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the PTVs, with respect to the TG-43 data. The corresponding calculated OAR doses were also lower. The model-based TG-186 dose calculations have considered reduced backscattering due to environmental air as well as the dose-to-medium influenced by the mould materials and tissue composition. The median PTV dose was robust within 0.5% for simulated variations of mould material densities in the range of 1.0 g/cm(3) to 1.26 g/cm(3) up to 7 mm total mould thickness. CONCLUSIONS: HDR contact BT with individual moulds is a safe modality for routine treatment of perinasal skin tumors. The technique provides good target coverage and OARs’ protection, while being robust against small variances in mould material density. Model-based dose calculations (TG-186) should complement TG-43 dose calculations for verification purpose and quality improvement. Termedia Publishing House 2021-04-14 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8060955/ /pubmed/33897792 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.105286 Text en Copyright © 2021 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Scherf, Christian
Licher, Jörg
Mletzko, Christina
Trommel, Martin
Tselis, Nikolaos
Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios
Diefenhardt, Markus
Rödel, Claus
Köhn, Janett
Ramm, Ulla
Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
title Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
title_full Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
title_fullStr Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
title_full_unstemmed Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
title_short Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
title_sort individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897792
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.105286
work_keys_str_mv AT scherfchristian individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT licherjorg individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT mletzkochristina individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT trommelmartin individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT tselisnikolaos individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT chatzikonstantinougeorgios individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT diefenhardtmarkus individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT rodelclaus individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT kohnjanett individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview
AT rammulla individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview