Cargando…
Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view
PURPOSE: Dosimetric treatment planning evaluations concerning patient-adapted moulds for iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy are presented in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with perinasal skin tumors were treated with individual moulds made of biocompatible epithetic materials...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897792 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.105286 |
_version_ | 1783681466573520896 |
---|---|
author | Scherf, Christian Licher, Jörg Mletzko, Christina Trommel, Martin Tselis, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios Diefenhardt, Markus Rödel, Claus Köhn, Janett Ramm, Ulla |
author_facet | Scherf, Christian Licher, Jörg Mletzko, Christina Trommel, Martin Tselis, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios Diefenhardt, Markus Rödel, Claus Köhn, Janett Ramm, Ulla |
author_sort | Scherf, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Dosimetric treatment planning evaluations concerning patient-adapted moulds for iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy are presented in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with perinasal skin tumors were treated with individual moulds made of biocompatible epithetic materials with embedded plastic applicators. Treatment plans were optimized with regard to clinical requirements, and dose was calculated using standard water-based TG-43 formalism. In addition, retrospective material-dependent collapsed cone calculations according to TG-186 protocol were evaluated to quantify the limitations of TG-43 protocol for this superficial brachytherapy technique. RESULTS: The dose-volume parameters D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the planning target volumes (PTVs) for TG-43 dose calculations yielded 92.2% to 102.5%, 75.1% to 93.1%, and 7.4% to 41.7% of the prescribed dose, respectively. The max- imum overall dose to the ipsilateral eyeball as the most affected organ at risk (OAR) varied between 8.9 and 36.4 Gy. TG-186 calculations with Hounsfield unit-based density allocation resulted in down by –6.4%, –16.7%, and –30.0% lower average D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the PTVs, with respect to the TG-43 data. The corresponding calculated OAR doses were also lower. The model-based TG-186 dose calculations have considered reduced backscattering due to environmental air as well as the dose-to-medium influenced by the mould materials and tissue composition. The median PTV dose was robust within 0.5% for simulated variations of mould material densities in the range of 1.0 g/cm(3) to 1.26 g/cm(3) up to 7 mm total mould thickness. CONCLUSIONS: HDR contact BT with individual moulds is a safe modality for routine treatment of perinasal skin tumors. The technique provides good target coverage and OARs’ protection, while being robust against small variances in mould material density. Model-based dose calculations (TG-186) should complement TG-43 dose calculations for verification purpose and quality improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8060955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80609552021-04-23 Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view Scherf, Christian Licher, Jörg Mletzko, Christina Trommel, Martin Tselis, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios Diefenhardt, Markus Rödel, Claus Köhn, Janett Ramm, Ulla J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Dosimetric treatment planning evaluations concerning patient-adapted moulds for iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy are presented in this report. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with perinasal skin tumors were treated with individual moulds made of biocompatible epithetic materials with embedded plastic applicators. Treatment plans were optimized with regard to clinical requirements, and dose was calculated using standard water-based TG-43 formalism. In addition, retrospective material-dependent collapsed cone calculations according to TG-186 protocol were evaluated to quantify the limitations of TG-43 protocol for this superficial brachytherapy technique. RESULTS: The dose-volume parameters D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the planning target volumes (PTVs) for TG-43 dose calculations yielded 92.2% to 102.5%, 75.1% to 93.1%, and 7.4% to 41.7% of the prescribed dose, respectively. The max- imum overall dose to the ipsilateral eyeball as the most affected organ at risk (OAR) varied between 8.9 and 36.4 Gy. TG-186 calculations with Hounsfield unit-based density allocation resulted in down by –6.4%, –16.7%, and –30.0% lower average D(90), V(100), and V(150) of the PTVs, with respect to the TG-43 data. The corresponding calculated OAR doses were also lower. The model-based TG-186 dose calculations have considered reduced backscattering due to environmental air as well as the dose-to-medium influenced by the mould materials and tissue composition. The median PTV dose was robust within 0.5% for simulated variations of mould material densities in the range of 1.0 g/cm(3) to 1.26 g/cm(3) up to 7 mm total mould thickness. CONCLUSIONS: HDR contact BT with individual moulds is a safe modality for routine treatment of perinasal skin tumors. The technique provides good target coverage and OARs’ protection, while being robust against small variances in mould material density. Model-based dose calculations (TG-186) should complement TG-43 dose calculations for verification purpose and quality improvement. Termedia Publishing House 2021-04-14 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8060955/ /pubmed/33897792 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.105286 Text en Copyright © 2021 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Scherf, Christian Licher, Jörg Mletzko, Christina Trommel, Martin Tselis, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou, Georgios Diefenhardt, Markus Rödel, Claus Köhn, Janett Ramm, Ulla Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
title | Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
title_full | Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
title_fullStr | Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
title_full_unstemmed | Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
title_short | Individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
title_sort | individualized mould-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for perinasal skin tumors: technique evaluation from a dosimetric point of view |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897792 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.105286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scherfchristian individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT licherjorg individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT mletzkochristina individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT trommelmartin individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT tselisnikolaos individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT chatzikonstantinougeorgios individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT diefenhardtmarkus individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT rodelclaus individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT kohnjanett individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview AT rammulla individualizedmouldbasedhighdoseratebrachytherapyforperinasalskintumorstechniqueevaluationfromadosimetricpointofview |