Cargando…
The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Identifying how unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery arise is challenging. Experimental vignette studies can help, by isolating and manipulating potential drivers of differences in care. There is a lack of methodological and practical guidance on how to design and conduct these...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4 |
_version_ | 1783681486358052864 |
---|---|
author | Sheringham, Jessica Kuhn, Isla Burt, Jenni |
author_facet | Sheringham, Jessica Kuhn, Isla Burt, Jenni |
author_sort | Sheringham, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Identifying how unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery arise is challenging. Experimental vignette studies can help, by isolating and manipulating potential drivers of differences in care. There is a lack of methodological and practical guidance on how to design and conduct these studies robustly. The aim of this study was to locate, methodologically assess, and synthesise the contribution of experimental vignette studies to the identification of drivers of unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery. METHODS: We used a scoping review approach. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (2007–2019) using terms relating to vignettes and variations in healthcare. We screened title/abstracts and full text to identify studies using experimental vignettes to examine drivers of variations in healthcare delivery. Included papers were assessed against a methodological framework synthesised from vignette study design recommendations within and beyond healthcare. RESULTS: We located 21 eligible studies. Study participants were almost exclusively clinicians (18/21). Vignettes were delivered via text (n = 6), pictures (n = 6), video (n = 6) or interactively, using face-to-face, telephone or online simulated consultations (n = 3). Few studies evaluated the credibility of vignettes, and many had flaws in their wider study design. Ten were of good methodological quality. Studies contributed to understanding variations in care, most commonly by testing hypotheses that could not be examined directly using real patients. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental vignette studies can be an important methodological tool for identifying how unwarranted variations in care can arise. Flaws in study design or conduct can limit their credibility or produce biased results. Their full potential has yet to be realised. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8061048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80610482021-04-22 The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review Sheringham, Jessica Kuhn, Isla Burt, Jenni BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Identifying how unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery arise is challenging. Experimental vignette studies can help, by isolating and manipulating potential drivers of differences in care. There is a lack of methodological and practical guidance on how to design and conduct these studies robustly. The aim of this study was to locate, methodologically assess, and synthesise the contribution of experimental vignette studies to the identification of drivers of unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery. METHODS: We used a scoping review approach. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (2007–2019) using terms relating to vignettes and variations in healthcare. We screened title/abstracts and full text to identify studies using experimental vignettes to examine drivers of variations in healthcare delivery. Included papers were assessed against a methodological framework synthesised from vignette study design recommendations within and beyond healthcare. RESULTS: We located 21 eligible studies. Study participants were almost exclusively clinicians (18/21). Vignettes were delivered via text (n = 6), pictures (n = 6), video (n = 6) or interactively, using face-to-face, telephone or online simulated consultations (n = 3). Few studies evaluated the credibility of vignettes, and many had flaws in their wider study design. Ten were of good methodological quality. Studies contributed to understanding variations in care, most commonly by testing hypotheses that could not be examined directly using real patients. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental vignette studies can be an important methodological tool for identifying how unwarranted variations in care can arise. Flaws in study design or conduct can limit their credibility or produce biased results. Their full potential has yet to be realised. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4. BioMed Central 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8061048/ /pubmed/33888077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sheringham, Jessica Kuhn, Isla Burt, Jenni The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
title | The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
title_full | The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
title_short | The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
title_sort | use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheringhamjessica theuseofexperimentalvignettestudiestoidentifydriversofvariationsinthedeliveryofhealthcareascopingreview AT kuhnisla theuseofexperimentalvignettestudiestoidentifydriversofvariationsinthedeliveryofhealthcareascopingreview AT burtjenni theuseofexperimentalvignettestudiestoidentifydriversofvariationsinthedeliveryofhealthcareascopingreview AT sheringhamjessica useofexperimentalvignettestudiestoidentifydriversofvariationsinthedeliveryofhealthcareascopingreview AT kuhnisla useofexperimentalvignettestudiestoidentifydriversofvariationsinthedeliveryofhealthcareascopingreview AT burtjenni useofexperimentalvignettestudiestoidentifydriversofvariationsinthedeliveryofhealthcareascopingreview |