Cargando…

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: During the past two decades, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) has been proposed as an alternative technique to open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) and has become increasingly accepted for the treatment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nevertheles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piszczek, Radosław, Nowak, Łukasz, Krajewski, Wojciech, Chorbińska, Joanna, Poletajew, Sławomir, Moschini, Marco, Kaliszewski, Krzysztof, Zdrojowy, Romuald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z
_version_ 1783681492097957888
author Piszczek, Radosław
Nowak, Łukasz
Krajewski, Wojciech
Chorbińska, Joanna
Poletajew, Sławomir
Moschini, Marco
Kaliszewski, Krzysztof
Zdrojowy, Romuald
author_facet Piszczek, Radosław
Nowak, Łukasz
Krajewski, Wojciech
Chorbińska, Joanna
Poletajew, Sławomir
Moschini, Marco
Kaliszewski, Krzysztof
Zdrojowy, Romuald
author_sort Piszczek, Radosław
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the past two decades, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) has been proposed as an alternative technique to open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) and has become increasingly accepted for the treatment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nevertheless, the oncologic efficacy of LRNU remains controversial, especially for the treatment of locally advanced (T3/T4 and/or N+) UTUC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to cumulatively compare the oncological outcomes of LRNU versus ORNU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search was conducted of three electronic databases, namely, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measurements of cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), including hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were extracted and pooled. RESULTS: Eighteen articles published from 2007 to 2020 were included in the final quantitative analysis. One study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and the remaining articles had a retrospective design. Among a total of 10,730 participants in the selected papers, 5959 (55.5%) and 4771 (44.5%) underwent ORNU and LRNU, respectively. The results of pooled analyses revealed no significant differences in CSS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60–1.19, p = 0.33), OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.13, p = 0.25), IVRFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.39, p = 0.52), and RFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94–1.25, p = 0.26) between LRNU and ORNU groups. Furthermore, the results of subgroup analyses for pT3/T4 and pTany N+ populations did not confirm any statistically significant differences between LRNU and ORNU in terms of any survival parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our present meta-analysis of current evidence suggests that LRNU and ORNU have comparable oncological outcomes in patients with UTUC, even in those with locally advanced disease. Further multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and uniform data regarding specific surgical procedures, such as bladder cuff excision, are required to establish definitive conclusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80610742021-04-22 Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis Piszczek, Radosław Nowak, Łukasz Krajewski, Wojciech Chorbińska, Joanna Poletajew, Sławomir Moschini, Marco Kaliszewski, Krzysztof Zdrojowy, Romuald World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: During the past two decades, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) has been proposed as an alternative technique to open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) and has become increasingly accepted for the treatment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nevertheless, the oncologic efficacy of LRNU remains controversial, especially for the treatment of locally advanced (T3/T4 and/or N+) UTUC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to cumulatively compare the oncological outcomes of LRNU versus ORNU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search was conducted of three electronic databases, namely, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measurements of cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), including hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were extracted and pooled. RESULTS: Eighteen articles published from 2007 to 2020 were included in the final quantitative analysis. One study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and the remaining articles had a retrospective design. Among a total of 10,730 participants in the selected papers, 5959 (55.5%) and 4771 (44.5%) underwent ORNU and LRNU, respectively. The results of pooled analyses revealed no significant differences in CSS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60–1.19, p = 0.33), OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.13, p = 0.25), IVRFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.39, p = 0.52), and RFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94–1.25, p = 0.26) between LRNU and ORNU groups. Furthermore, the results of subgroup analyses for pT3/T4 and pTany N+ populations did not confirm any statistically significant differences between LRNU and ORNU in terms of any survival parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our present meta-analysis of current evidence suggests that LRNU and ORNU have comparable oncological outcomes in patients with UTUC, even in those with locally advanced disease. Further multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and uniform data regarding specific surgical procedures, such as bladder cuff excision, are required to establish definitive conclusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z. BioMed Central 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8061074/ /pubmed/33882936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Piszczek, Radosław
Nowak, Łukasz
Krajewski, Wojciech
Chorbińska, Joanna
Poletajew, Sławomir
Moschini, Marco
Kaliszewski, Krzysztof
Zdrojowy, Romuald
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
title Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
title_full Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
title_fullStr Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
title_short Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
title_sort oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z
work_keys_str_mv AT piszczekradosław oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT nowakłukasz oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT krajewskiwojciech oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT chorbinskajoanna oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT poletajewsławomir oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT moschinimarco oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT kaliszewskikrzysztof oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT zdrojowyromuald oncologicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicversusopennephroureterectomyforthetreatmentofuppertracturothelialcarcinomaanupdatedmetaanalysis