Cargando…

Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish

Through using different sources, population reintroductions can create genetically diverse populations at low risk of harmful inbreeding and well equipped for adaptation to future environments. Genetic variation from one source can mask locally nonoptimal alleles from another, thereby enhancing adap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutz, Maiko L., Tonkin, Zeb, Yen, Jian D.L., Johnson, Glen, Ingram, Brett A., Sharley, Joanne, Lyon, Jarod, Chapple, David G., Sunnucks, Paul, Pavlova, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13173
_version_ 1783681530731692032
author Lutz, Maiko L.
Tonkin, Zeb
Yen, Jian D.L.
Johnson, Glen
Ingram, Brett A.
Sharley, Joanne
Lyon, Jarod
Chapple, David G.
Sunnucks, Paul
Pavlova, Alexandra
author_facet Lutz, Maiko L.
Tonkin, Zeb
Yen, Jian D.L.
Johnson, Glen
Ingram, Brett A.
Sharley, Joanne
Lyon, Jarod
Chapple, David G.
Sunnucks, Paul
Pavlova, Alexandra
author_sort Lutz, Maiko L.
collection PubMed
description Through using different sources, population reintroductions can create genetically diverse populations at low risk of harmful inbreeding and well equipped for adaptation to future environments. Genetic variation from one source can mask locally nonoptimal alleles from another, thereby enhancing adaptive potential and population persistence. We assessed the outcomes in survival, growth and reproduction of using two differentiated sources (genetically diverse Yarra and moderately diverse Dartmouth) for translocations and stocking to reintroduce the endangered Australian freshwater Macquarie perch Macquaria australasica into the Ovens River. For stocking, same‐ and different‐population parents (“cross‐types”) were used during hatchery production. Genetic samples and data on individual fish were collected over three years of monitoring the Ovens. We genetically assigned Ovens fish to their broodstock parents and tested whether cross‐type and genetic dissimilarity between parents are associated with offspring survival, and whether cross‐type and parental dissimilarity or individual genetic diversity are associated with somatic growth rates of stocked fish. We genetically identified translocated fish and assessed local recruit ancestry. Of 296 Ovens fish, 31.1% were inferred to be stocked, 1.3% translocated and 67.6% locally born. Cross‐type strongly predicted survival of stocked offspring: those with two Yarra parents had the highest survival, followed by offspring with two‐population, then Dartmouth, ancestry. Of the Ovens recruits, 59.5% had Yarra, 33.5% two‐population and 7.0% Dartmouth ancestry, despite 67% of stocked and 98% of translocated fish originating from Dartmouth. Offspring with two Yarra parents grew faster than offspring of Dartmouth or two‐population ancestry. Although Dartmouth fish appear to be less fit in the Ovens compared to Yarra fish, possibly due to deleterious variation or genetic or plastic maladaptation, they contribute to the reintroduced population through local interbreeding with Yarra fish and relatively high survival of stocked offspring of two‐population ancestry. Thus, combining compatible stocks is likely to benefit restoration of other wildlife populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80612642021-04-23 Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish Lutz, Maiko L. Tonkin, Zeb Yen, Jian D.L. Johnson, Glen Ingram, Brett A. Sharley, Joanne Lyon, Jarod Chapple, David G. Sunnucks, Paul Pavlova, Alexandra Evol Appl Original Articles Through using different sources, population reintroductions can create genetically diverse populations at low risk of harmful inbreeding and well equipped for adaptation to future environments. Genetic variation from one source can mask locally nonoptimal alleles from another, thereby enhancing adaptive potential and population persistence. We assessed the outcomes in survival, growth and reproduction of using two differentiated sources (genetically diverse Yarra and moderately diverse Dartmouth) for translocations and stocking to reintroduce the endangered Australian freshwater Macquarie perch Macquaria australasica into the Ovens River. For stocking, same‐ and different‐population parents (“cross‐types”) were used during hatchery production. Genetic samples and data on individual fish were collected over three years of monitoring the Ovens. We genetically assigned Ovens fish to their broodstock parents and tested whether cross‐type and genetic dissimilarity between parents are associated with offspring survival, and whether cross‐type and parental dissimilarity or individual genetic diversity are associated with somatic growth rates of stocked fish. We genetically identified translocated fish and assessed local recruit ancestry. Of 296 Ovens fish, 31.1% were inferred to be stocked, 1.3% translocated and 67.6% locally born. Cross‐type strongly predicted survival of stocked offspring: those with two Yarra parents had the highest survival, followed by offspring with two‐population, then Dartmouth, ancestry. Of the Ovens recruits, 59.5% had Yarra, 33.5% two‐population and 7.0% Dartmouth ancestry, despite 67% of stocked and 98% of translocated fish originating from Dartmouth. Offspring with two Yarra parents grew faster than offspring of Dartmouth or two‐population ancestry. Although Dartmouth fish appear to be less fit in the Ovens compared to Yarra fish, possibly due to deleterious variation or genetic or plastic maladaptation, they contribute to the reintroduced population through local interbreeding with Yarra fish and relatively high survival of stocked offspring of two‐population ancestry. Thus, combining compatible stocks is likely to benefit restoration of other wildlife populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8061264/ /pubmed/33897813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13173 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lutz, Maiko L.
Tonkin, Zeb
Yen, Jian D.L.
Johnson, Glen
Ingram, Brett A.
Sharley, Joanne
Lyon, Jarod
Chapple, David G.
Sunnucks, Paul
Pavlova, Alexandra
Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
title Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
title_full Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
title_fullStr Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
title_full_unstemmed Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
title_short Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
title_sort using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13173
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzmaikol usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT tonkinzeb usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT yenjiandl usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT johnsonglen usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT ingrambretta usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT sharleyjoanne usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT lyonjarod usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT chappledavidg usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT sunnuckspaul usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish
AT pavlovaalexandra usingmultiplesourcesduringreintroductionofalocallyextinctpopulationbenefitssurvivalandreproductionofanendangeredfreshwaterfish