Cargando…

Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing

Anthropogenic activities may facilitate undesirable hybridization and genomic introgression between fish species. Walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) are economically valuable freshwater species that can spontaneously hybridize in areas of sympatry. Levels of genomic introgressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Carly F., Eberts, Rebecca L., Goncin, Una, Somers, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13174
_version_ 1783681531672264704
author Graham, Carly F.
Eberts, Rebecca L.
Goncin, Una
Somers, Christopher M.
author_facet Graham, Carly F.
Eberts, Rebecca L.
Goncin, Una
Somers, Christopher M.
author_sort Graham, Carly F.
collection PubMed
description Anthropogenic activities may facilitate undesirable hybridization and genomic introgression between fish species. Walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) are economically valuable freshwater species that can spontaneously hybridize in areas of sympatry. Levels of genomic introgression between walleye and sauger may be increased by modifications to waterbodies (e.g., reservoir development) and inadvertent propagation of hybrids in stocking programs. We used genotyping by sequencing (GBS) to examine 217 fish from two large reservoirs with mixed populations of walleye and sauger in Saskatchewan, Canada (Lake Diefenbaker, Tobin Lake). Analyses with 20,038 (r90) and 478 (r100) single nucleotide polymorphisms clearly resolved walleye and sauger, and classified hybrids with high confidence. F(1), F(2), and multigeneration hybrids were detected in Lake Diefenbaker, indicating potentially high levels of genomic introgression. In contrast, only F(1) hybrids were detected in Tobin Lake. Field classification of fish was unreliable; 7% of fish were misidentified based on broad species categories. Important for activities such as brood stock selection, 12 of 173 (7%) fish field identified as pure walleye, and one of 24 (4%) identified as pure sauger were actually hybrids. In addition, two of 15 (13%) field‐identified hybrids were actually pure walleye or sauger. We conclude that hybridization and introgression are occurring in Saskatchewan reservoirs and that caution is warranted when using these populations in stocking programs. GBS offers a powerful and flexible tool for examining hybridization without preidentification of informative loci, eliminating some of the key challenges associated with other marker types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80612682021-04-23 Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing Graham, Carly F. Eberts, Rebecca L. Goncin, Una Somers, Christopher M. Evol Appl Original Articles Anthropogenic activities may facilitate undesirable hybridization and genomic introgression between fish species. Walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) are economically valuable freshwater species that can spontaneously hybridize in areas of sympatry. Levels of genomic introgression between walleye and sauger may be increased by modifications to waterbodies (e.g., reservoir development) and inadvertent propagation of hybrids in stocking programs. We used genotyping by sequencing (GBS) to examine 217 fish from two large reservoirs with mixed populations of walleye and sauger in Saskatchewan, Canada (Lake Diefenbaker, Tobin Lake). Analyses with 20,038 (r90) and 478 (r100) single nucleotide polymorphisms clearly resolved walleye and sauger, and classified hybrids with high confidence. F(1), F(2), and multigeneration hybrids were detected in Lake Diefenbaker, indicating potentially high levels of genomic introgression. In contrast, only F(1) hybrids were detected in Tobin Lake. Field classification of fish was unreliable; 7% of fish were misidentified based on broad species categories. Important for activities such as brood stock selection, 12 of 173 (7%) fish field identified as pure walleye, and one of 24 (4%) identified as pure sauger were actually hybrids. In addition, two of 15 (13%) field‐identified hybrids were actually pure walleye or sauger. We conclude that hybridization and introgression are occurring in Saskatchewan reservoirs and that caution is warranted when using these populations in stocking programs. GBS offers a powerful and flexible tool for examining hybridization without preidentification of informative loci, eliminating some of the key challenges associated with other marker types. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8061268/ /pubmed/33897814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13174 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Graham, Carly F.
Eberts, Rebecca L.
Goncin, Una
Somers, Christopher M.
Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing
title Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing
title_full Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing
title_fullStr Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing
title_short Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (Sander vitreus) and sauger (Sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: Insights from genotyping by sequencing
title_sort spontaneous hybridization and introgression between walleye (sander vitreus) and sauger (sander canadensis) in two large reservoirs: insights from genotyping by sequencing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13174
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamcarlyf spontaneoushybridizationandintrogressionbetweenwalleyesandervitreusandsaugersandercanadensisintwolargereservoirsinsightsfromgenotypingbysequencing
AT ebertsrebeccal spontaneoushybridizationandintrogressionbetweenwalleyesandervitreusandsaugersandercanadensisintwolargereservoirsinsightsfromgenotypingbysequencing
AT goncinuna spontaneoushybridizationandintrogressionbetweenwalleyesandervitreusandsaugersandercanadensisintwolargereservoirsinsightsfromgenotypingbysequencing
AT somerschristopherm spontaneoushybridizationandintrogressionbetweenwalleyesandervitreusandsaugersandercanadensisintwolargereservoirsinsightsfromgenotypingbysequencing