Cargando…

Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: Recognition and reporting of vector-borne and zoonotic disease (VBZD) cases is largely dependent upon the consideration of such diseases by healthcare practitioners during the initial diagnosis and ordering of specific confirmative diagnostic tests. This study was conducted to assess the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peper, Steven T., Jones, Adam C., Webb, Cynthia Reinoso, Lacy, Mark, Presley, Steven M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942111
http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001248
_version_ 1783681545706405888
author Peper, Steven T.
Jones, Adam C.
Webb, Cynthia Reinoso
Lacy, Mark
Presley, Steven M.
author_facet Peper, Steven T.
Jones, Adam C.
Webb, Cynthia Reinoso
Lacy, Mark
Presley, Steven M.
author_sort Peper, Steven T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recognition and reporting of vector-borne and zoonotic disease (VBZD) cases is largely dependent upon the consideration of such diseases by healthcare practitioners during the initial diagnosis and ordering of specific confirmative diagnostic tests. This study was conducted to assess the general knowledge and understanding of VBZD transmission and clinical presentation. METHODS: Healthcare practitioners were surveyed to determine the extent of training and educational experiences they received relative to VBZDs, and their likelihood to consider such diseases during differential diagnoses. In addition, an assessment of their knowledge of arthropod species that may transmit VBZD pathogens was conducted. RESULTS: Having postprofessional school training relevant to VBZDs significantly influenced diagnostic accuracy for such disease cases based on the presented clinical signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of VBZDs in the United States likely is significantly underestimated. The authors suggest the enhancement of VBZD-focused education as an important initiative that would significantly improve timely diagnosis, treatment, and, ultimately, prevention of these diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80613362021-04-30 Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis Peper, Steven T. Jones, Adam C. Webb, Cynthia Reinoso Lacy, Mark Presley, Steven M. South Med J Bioethics & Medical Education OBJECTIVE: Recognition and reporting of vector-borne and zoonotic disease (VBZD) cases is largely dependent upon the consideration of such diseases by healthcare practitioners during the initial diagnosis and ordering of specific confirmative diagnostic tests. This study was conducted to assess the general knowledge and understanding of VBZD transmission and clinical presentation. METHODS: Healthcare practitioners were surveyed to determine the extent of training and educational experiences they received relative to VBZDs, and their likelihood to consider such diseases during differential diagnoses. In addition, an assessment of their knowledge of arthropod species that may transmit VBZD pathogens was conducted. RESULTS: Having postprofessional school training relevant to VBZDs significantly influenced diagnostic accuracy for such disease cases based on the presented clinical signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of VBZDs in the United States likely is significantly underestimated. The authors suggest the enhancement of VBZD-focused education as an important initiative that would significantly improve timely diagnosis, treatment, and, ultimately, prevention of these diseases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8061336/ /pubmed/33942111 http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001248 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Southern Medical Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Bioethics & Medical Education
Peper, Steven T.
Jones, Adam C.
Webb, Cynthia Reinoso
Lacy, Mark
Presley, Steven M.
Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis
title Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis
title_full Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis
title_fullStr Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis
title_short Consideration of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases during Differential Diagnosis
title_sort consideration of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases during differential diagnosis
topic Bioethics & Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942111
http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001248
work_keys_str_mv AT peperstevent considerationofvectorborneandzoonoticdiseasesduringdifferentialdiagnosis
AT jonesadamc considerationofvectorborneandzoonoticdiseasesduringdifferentialdiagnosis
AT webbcynthiareinoso considerationofvectorborneandzoonoticdiseasesduringdifferentialdiagnosis
AT lacymark considerationofvectorborneandzoonoticdiseasesduringdifferentialdiagnosis
AT presleystevenm considerationofvectorborneandzoonoticdiseasesduringdifferentialdiagnosis