Cargando…
Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
AIM: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rate of axial and tilted implants in rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using all on four concept. SETTING AND DESIGN: Systematic Review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Google scholar,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835063 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_100_20 |
_version_ | 1783681567470649344 |
---|---|
author | Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya Mascarenhas, Kennedy Amin, Bhavya Rajagopal, Praveen |
author_facet | Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya Mascarenhas, Kennedy Amin, Bhavya Rajagopal, Praveen |
author_sort | Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rate of axial and tilted implants in rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using all on four concept. SETTING AND DESIGN: Systematic Review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Google scholar, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Hand searches were conducted of the bibliographic of related journals and systematic reviews. A total of 380 articles were obtained from the intial screening process. Of these articles, 25 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors performed evaluation of articles independently as well as data extraction and quality assessment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the acrylic prosthesis. The mean cumulative survival rate of implants (72-132 months) were 94% to 98%. The prosthesis survival rate (12 months) was between 99% to 100%. The averaged bone loss was 1.3 ±0.4 mm (12-60 months). No Significant difference was found between survival rates of axial and tilted implants nor between maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSION: All on four concept can be employed successfully in the edentulous patients with resorbed ridges while improving their quality of life and reducing morbidity. However,randomized clinical trials with large sampling size and long term follow up should be incorporated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8061444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80614442022-01-01 Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya Mascarenhas, Kennedy Amin, Bhavya Rajagopal, Praveen J Indian Prosthodont Soc Review AIM: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rate of axial and tilted implants in rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using all on four concept. SETTING AND DESIGN: Systematic Review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Google scholar, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Hand searches were conducted of the bibliographic of related journals and systematic reviews. A total of 380 articles were obtained from the intial screening process. Of these articles, 25 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors performed evaluation of articles independently as well as data extraction and quality assessment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the acrylic prosthesis. The mean cumulative survival rate of implants (72-132 months) were 94% to 98%. The prosthesis survival rate (12 months) was between 99% to 100%. The averaged bone loss was 1.3 ±0.4 mm (12-60 months). No Significant difference was found between survival rates of axial and tilted implants nor between maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSION: All on four concept can be employed successfully in the edentulous patients with resorbed ridges while improving their quality of life and reducing morbidity. However,randomized clinical trials with large sampling size and long term follow up should be incorporated. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8061444/ /pubmed/33835063 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_100_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya Mascarenhas, Kennedy Amin, Bhavya Rajagopal, Praveen Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review |
title | Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review |
title_full | Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review |
title_short | Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review |
title_sort | survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the all-on-four™ concept: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835063 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_100_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaonkarsnehaharishchandra survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview AT arasmeenaajay survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview AT chitrevidya survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview AT mascarenhaskennedy survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview AT aminbhavya survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview AT rajagopalpraveen survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview |