Cargando…

Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review

AIM: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rate of axial and tilted implants in rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using all on four concept. SETTING AND DESIGN: Systematic Review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Google scholar,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra, Aras, Meena Ajay, Chitre, Vidya, Mascarenhas, Kennedy, Amin, Bhavya, Rajagopal, Praveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835063
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_100_20
_version_ 1783681567470649344
author Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
Mascarenhas, Kennedy
Amin, Bhavya
Rajagopal, Praveen
author_facet Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
Mascarenhas, Kennedy
Amin, Bhavya
Rajagopal, Praveen
author_sort Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rate of axial and tilted implants in rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using all on four concept. SETTING AND DESIGN: Systematic Review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Google scholar, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Hand searches were conducted of the bibliographic of related journals and systematic reviews. A total of 380 articles were obtained from the intial screening process. Of these articles, 25 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors performed evaluation of articles independently as well as data extraction and quality assessment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the acrylic prosthesis. The mean cumulative survival rate of implants (72-132 months) were 94% to 98%. The prosthesis survival rate (12 months) was between 99% to 100%. The averaged bone loss was 1.3 ±0.4 mm (12-60 months). No Significant difference was found between survival rates of axial and tilted implants nor between maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSION: All on four concept can be employed successfully in the edentulous patients with resorbed ridges while improving their quality of life and reducing morbidity. However,randomized clinical trials with large sampling size and long term follow up should be incorporated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80614442022-01-01 Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra Aras, Meena Ajay Chitre, Vidya Mascarenhas, Kennedy Amin, Bhavya Rajagopal, Praveen J Indian Prosthodont Soc Review AIM: The aim of this review was to evaluate the survival rate of axial and tilted implants in rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using all on four concept. SETTING AND DESIGN: Systematic Review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Google scholar, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Hand searches were conducted of the bibliographic of related journals and systematic reviews. A total of 380 articles were obtained from the intial screening process. Of these articles, 25 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors performed evaluation of articles independently as well as data extraction and quality assessment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the acrylic prosthesis. The mean cumulative survival rate of implants (72-132 months) were 94% to 98%. The prosthesis survival rate (12 months) was between 99% to 100%. The averaged bone loss was 1.3 ±0.4 mm (12-60 months). No Significant difference was found between survival rates of axial and tilted implants nor between maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSION: All on four concept can be employed successfully in the edentulous patients with resorbed ridges while improving their quality of life and reducing morbidity. However,randomized clinical trials with large sampling size and long term follow up should be incorporated. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8061444/ /pubmed/33835063 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_100_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review
Gaonkar, Sneha Harishchandra
Aras, Meena Ajay
Chitre, Vidya
Mascarenhas, Kennedy
Amin, Bhavya
Rajagopal, Praveen
Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
title Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
title_full Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
title_fullStr Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
title_short Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review
title_sort survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the all-on-four™ concept: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835063
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_100_20
work_keys_str_mv AT gaonkarsnehaharishchandra survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview
AT arasmeenaajay survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview
AT chitrevidya survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview
AT mascarenhaskennedy survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview
AT aminbhavya survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview
AT rajagopalpraveen survivalratesofaxialandtiltedimplantsintherehabilitationofedentulousjawsusingtheallonfourconceptasystematicreview