Cargando…
Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Millets are widely marketed as healthier alternatives to white rice (WR). This study was conducted with two aims: firstly, to look at the nature and quality of minor millets available in the Chennai market and secondly, to estimate the glycaemic index (GI) of unpolished...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380705 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2309_18 |
_version_ | 1783681598741282816 |
---|---|
author | Malavika, Muthukaruppan Shobana, Shanmugam Vijayalakshmi, Parthasarathy Ganeshjeevan, Raman Gayathri, Rajagopal Kavitha, Vasudevan Gayathri, Nagamuthu Savitha, Ravichandran Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Malleshi, Nagappa Gurusiddappa Krishnaswamy, Kamala Henry, Christiani Jayakumar Mohan, Viswanathan Sudha, Vasudevan |
author_facet | Malavika, Muthukaruppan Shobana, Shanmugam Vijayalakshmi, Parthasarathy Ganeshjeevan, Raman Gayathri, Rajagopal Kavitha, Vasudevan Gayathri, Nagamuthu Savitha, Ravichandran Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Malleshi, Nagappa Gurusiddappa Krishnaswamy, Kamala Henry, Christiani Jayakumar Mohan, Viswanathan Sudha, Vasudevan |
author_sort | Malavika, Muthukaruppan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Millets are widely marketed as healthier alternatives to white rice (WR). This study was conducted with two aims: firstly, to look at the nature and quality of minor millets available in the Chennai market and secondly, to estimate the glycaemic index (GI) of unpolished forms of the two most widely available minor millets, i.e. little (LM) and foxtail millet (FXM). METHODS: A market survey was conducted of 100 food stores in four zones of Chennai, south India. Morphological features of market millet samples were compared with that of unpolished millets under stereo-zoom microscope, and the claims declared on the pack were evaluated. A consumer perception survey was conducted among 20 minor millet-consuming female homemakers. Finally, the GI of unpolished LM and FXM was evaluated using a validated protocol in 12 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Forty eight brands of minor millets were available, with LM and FXM being the most common. Most of the millet samples were identified as highly polished grains using stereo-zoom microscope. The product labels were misleading and showed no scientific backing for claims mentioned on the label. Most participants (12 of 20) were unaware of the fact that millets can also be polished like rice. Both LM and FXM exhibited high GI (88.6±5.7 and 88.6±8.7, respectively). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The availability and knowledge regarding unpolished millets was low. Both LM and FXM exhibited high GI. Hence, substituting millets for WR might be of limited benefit considering the glycaemic property in the prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases such as T2DM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8061600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80616002021-04-27 Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet Malavika, Muthukaruppan Shobana, Shanmugam Vijayalakshmi, Parthasarathy Ganeshjeevan, Raman Gayathri, Rajagopal Kavitha, Vasudevan Gayathri, Nagamuthu Savitha, Ravichandran Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Malleshi, Nagappa Gurusiddappa Krishnaswamy, Kamala Henry, Christiani Jayakumar Mohan, Viswanathan Sudha, Vasudevan Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Millets are widely marketed as healthier alternatives to white rice (WR). This study was conducted with two aims: firstly, to look at the nature and quality of minor millets available in the Chennai market and secondly, to estimate the glycaemic index (GI) of unpolished forms of the two most widely available minor millets, i.e. little (LM) and foxtail millet (FXM). METHODS: A market survey was conducted of 100 food stores in four zones of Chennai, south India. Morphological features of market millet samples were compared with that of unpolished millets under stereo-zoom microscope, and the claims declared on the pack were evaluated. A consumer perception survey was conducted among 20 minor millet-consuming female homemakers. Finally, the GI of unpolished LM and FXM was evaluated using a validated protocol in 12 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Forty eight brands of minor millets were available, with LM and FXM being the most common. Most of the millet samples were identified as highly polished grains using stereo-zoom microscope. The product labels were misleading and showed no scientific backing for claims mentioned on the label. Most participants (12 of 20) were unaware of the fact that millets can also be polished like rice. Both LM and FXM exhibited high GI (88.6±5.7 and 88.6±8.7, respectively). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The availability and knowledge regarding unpolished millets was low. Both LM and FXM exhibited high GI. Hence, substituting millets for WR might be of limited benefit considering the glycaemic property in the prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases such as T2DM. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8061600/ /pubmed/33380705 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2309_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Malavika, Muthukaruppan Shobana, Shanmugam Vijayalakshmi, Parthasarathy Ganeshjeevan, Raman Gayathri, Rajagopal Kavitha, Vasudevan Gayathri, Nagamuthu Savitha, Ravichandran Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Malleshi, Nagappa Gurusiddappa Krishnaswamy, Kamala Henry, Christiani Jayakumar Mohan, Viswanathan Sudha, Vasudevan Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
title | Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
title_full | Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
title_fullStr | Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
title_short | Assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south Indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
title_sort | assessment of quality of minor millets available in the south indian market & glycaemic index of cooked unpolished little & foxtail millet |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380705 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2309_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malavikamuthukaruppan assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT shobanashanmugam assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT vijayalakshmiparthasarathy assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT ganeshjeevanraman assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT gayathrirajagopal assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT kavithavasudevan assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT gayathrinagamuthu assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT savitharavichandran assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT unnikrishnanranjit assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT anjanaranjitmohan assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT malleshinagappagurusiddappa assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT krishnaswamykamala assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT henrychristianijayakumar assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT mohanviswanathan assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet AT sudhavasudevan assessmentofqualityofminormilletsavailableinthesouthindianmarketglycaemicindexofcookedunpolishedlittlefoxtailmillet |