Cargando…

Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region

OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of the Regional framework for action on implementation of the End TB Strategy in the Western Pacific, 2016–2020 in countries and areas in the World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to assess the framework’s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viney, Kerri, Lowbridge, Chris, Morishita, Fukushi, Rahevar, Kalpeshsinh, Oh, Kyung H, Islam, Tauhid, Marais, Ben J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Health Organization 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958821
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.268060
_version_ 1783681613851262976
author Viney, Kerri
Lowbridge, Chris
Morishita, Fukushi
Rahevar, Kalpeshsinh
Oh, Kyung H
Islam, Tauhid
Marais, Ben J
author_facet Viney, Kerri
Lowbridge, Chris
Morishita, Fukushi
Rahevar, Kalpeshsinh
Oh, Kyung H
Islam, Tauhid
Marais, Ben J
author_sort Viney, Kerri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of the Regional framework for action on implementation of the End TB Strategy in the Western Pacific, 2016–2020 in countries and areas in the World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to assess the framework’s measurable and perceived impact. We conducted an analysis of national tuberculosis strategic plans, a cross-sectional survey of senior staff of tuberculosis programmes, key informant interviews and some country case studies. FINDINGS: Of the 37 countries and areas of the Western Pacific Region, 14 had a national tuberculosis strategic plan, including all countries and areas with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Most senior tuberculosis programme staff who responded to the survey (16/23) found the regional framework useful when developing their national targets and grant applications. Programmatic challenges identified included financing, human resources, public–private mix, active case finding, and paediatric and drug-resistant tuberculosis. Most of the 17 key informants thought that the regional framework’s categorization of actions (for all settings, for specific settings and for pre-elimination settings) was useful, but that the added value of the regional framework over other relevant documents was not obvious because of overlap in content. CONCLUSION: The regional framework influenced national level tuberculosis control planning and implementation in a positive way. A future regional framework should provide a longer-term strategic horizon and specifically address emerging trends and persistent problems faced by countries or areas of the region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher World Health Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80616682021-05-05 Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region Viney, Kerri Lowbridge, Chris Morishita, Fukushi Rahevar, Kalpeshsinh Oh, Kyung H Islam, Tauhid Marais, Ben J Bull World Health Organ Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of the Regional framework for action on implementation of the End TB Strategy in the Western Pacific, 2016–2020 in countries and areas in the World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to assess the framework’s measurable and perceived impact. We conducted an analysis of national tuberculosis strategic plans, a cross-sectional survey of senior staff of tuberculosis programmes, key informant interviews and some country case studies. FINDINGS: Of the 37 countries and areas of the Western Pacific Region, 14 had a national tuberculosis strategic plan, including all countries and areas with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Most senior tuberculosis programme staff who responded to the survey (16/23) found the regional framework useful when developing their national targets and grant applications. Programmatic challenges identified included financing, human resources, public–private mix, active case finding, and paediatric and drug-resistant tuberculosis. Most of the 17 key informants thought that the regional framework’s categorization of actions (for all settings, for specific settings and for pre-elimination settings) was useful, but that the added value of the regional framework over other relevant documents was not obvious because of overlap in content. CONCLUSION: The regional framework influenced national level tuberculosis control planning and implementation in a positive way. A future regional framework should provide a longer-term strategic horizon and specifically address emerging trends and persistent problems faced by countries or areas of the region. World Health Organization 2021-05-01 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8061668/ /pubmed/33958821 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.268060 Text en (c) 2021 The authors; licensee World Health Organization. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Viney, Kerri
Lowbridge, Chris
Morishita, Fukushi
Rahevar, Kalpeshsinh
Oh, Kyung H
Islam, Tauhid
Marais, Ben J
Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region
title Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region
title_full Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region
title_fullStr Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region
title_short Evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, WHO Western Pacific Region
title_sort evaluation of the 2016–2020 regional tuberculosis response framework, who western pacific region
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958821
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.268060
work_keys_str_mv AT vineykerri evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion
AT lowbridgechris evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion
AT morishitafukushi evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion
AT rahevarkalpeshsinh evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion
AT ohkyungh evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion
AT islamtauhid evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion
AT maraisbenj evaluationofthe20162020regionaltuberculosisresponseframeworkwhowesternpacificregion