Cargando…

Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A

The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schep, Sarah J., Schutgens, Roger E. G., Fischer, Kathelijn, Voorberg, Jan, Boes, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000557
_version_ 1783681617075634176
author Schep, Sarah J.
Schutgens, Roger E. G.
Fischer, Kathelijn
Voorberg, Jan
Boes, Marianne
author_facet Schep, Sarah J.
Schutgens, Roger E. G.
Fischer, Kathelijn
Voorberg, Jan
Boes, Marianne
author_sort Schep, Sarah J.
collection PubMed
description The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism, we compared blood samples of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors for presence of immunoregulatory cells and markers, including regulatory B-cells (Bregs), regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and expression of regulatory markers on T-cells (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1], inducable T-cell costimulator, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), by use of flow cytometry. By cross-sectional analysis inhibitor patients (N = 20) were compared with inhibitor-negative (N = 28) and ex-inhibitor (N = 17) patients. In another longitudinal study, changes in immunoregulatory parameters were evaluated during ITI (N = 12) and compared with inhibitor-negative hemophilia A patients (N = 36). The frequency of Bregs, but not of Tregs nor MDSCs, was significantly reduced in inhibitor patients (3.2%) compared with inhibitor-negative (5.9%) and ex-inhibitor patients (8.9%; P < 0.01). CTLA4 expression on T-cells was also reduced (mean fluorescence intensity 133 in inhibitor versus 537 in inhibitor-negative patients; P < 0.01). Fittingly, in patients followed during ITI, inhibitor eradication associated with increased Bregs, increased Tregs, and increased expression of CTLA4 and PD1 on CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, inhibitor patients express significantly lower frequency of Bregs and Tregs marker expression, which are restored by successful ITI. Our findings suggest that an existing anti-FVIII immune response is associated with deficits in peripheral tolerance mechanisms and that Bregs and changes in immunoregulatory properties of CD4+ T-cells likely contribute to ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80616822021-04-23 Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A Schep, Sarah J. Schutgens, Roger E. G. Fischer, Kathelijn Voorberg, Jan Boes, Marianne Hemasphere Article The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism, we compared blood samples of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors for presence of immunoregulatory cells and markers, including regulatory B-cells (Bregs), regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and expression of regulatory markers on T-cells (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1], inducable T-cell costimulator, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), by use of flow cytometry. By cross-sectional analysis inhibitor patients (N = 20) were compared with inhibitor-negative (N = 28) and ex-inhibitor (N = 17) patients. In another longitudinal study, changes in immunoregulatory parameters were evaluated during ITI (N = 12) and compared with inhibitor-negative hemophilia A patients (N = 36). The frequency of Bregs, but not of Tregs nor MDSCs, was significantly reduced in inhibitor patients (3.2%) compared with inhibitor-negative (5.9%) and ex-inhibitor patients (8.9%; P < 0.01). CTLA4 expression on T-cells was also reduced (mean fluorescence intensity 133 in inhibitor versus 537 in inhibitor-negative patients; P < 0.01). Fittingly, in patients followed during ITI, inhibitor eradication associated with increased Bregs, increased Tregs, and increased expression of CTLA4 and PD1 on CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, inhibitor patients express significantly lower frequency of Bregs and Tregs marker expression, which are restored by successful ITI. Our findings suggest that an existing anti-FVIII immune response is associated with deficits in peripheral tolerance mechanisms and that Bregs and changes in immunoregulatory properties of CD4+ T-cells likely contribute to ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8061682/ /pubmed/33898928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000557 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Schep, Sarah J.
Schutgens, Roger E. G.
Fischer, Kathelijn
Voorberg, Jan
Boes, Marianne
Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A
title Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A
title_full Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A
title_fullStr Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A
title_full_unstemmed Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A
title_short Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A
title_sort role of regulatory cells in immune tolerance induction in hemophilia a
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33898928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000557
work_keys_str_mv AT schepsarahj roleofregulatorycellsinimmunetoleranceinductioninhemophiliaa
AT schutgensrogereg roleofregulatorycellsinimmunetoleranceinductioninhemophiliaa
AT fischerkathelijn roleofregulatorycellsinimmunetoleranceinductioninhemophiliaa
AT voorbergjan roleofregulatorycellsinimmunetoleranceinductioninhemophiliaa
AT boesmarianne roleofregulatorycellsinimmunetoleranceinductioninhemophiliaa