Cargando…

Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Matching demand and supply in nursing work continues to generate debate. Current approaches focus on objective measures, such as nurses per occupied bed or patient classification. However, staff numbers do not tell the whole staffing story. The subjective measure of nurses’ perceived ade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Mark, Carmen J E M, Vermeulen, Hester, Hendriks, Paul H J, van Oostveen, Catharina J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045245
_version_ 1783681640211415040
author van der Mark, Carmen J E M
Vermeulen, Hester
Hendriks, Paul H J
van Oostveen, Catharina J
author_facet van der Mark, Carmen J E M
Vermeulen, Hester
Hendriks, Paul H J
van Oostveen, Catharina J
author_sort van der Mark, Carmen J E M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Matching demand and supply in nursing work continues to generate debate. Current approaches focus on objective measures, such as nurses per occupied bed or patient classification. However, staff numbers do not tell the whole staffing story. The subjective measure of nurses’ perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) has the potential to enhance nurse staffing methods in a way that goes beyond traditional workload measurement or workforce planning methods. OBJECTIVES: To detect outcomes associated with nurses’ PAS and the factors that influence PAS and to review the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure PAS in a hospital setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed to identify outcomes associated with PAS, factors influencing PAS and instruments measuring PAS. A search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Business Source Complete and Embase databases identified 2609 potentially relevant articles. Data were independently extracted, analysed and synthesised. The quality of studies describing influencing factors or outcomes of PAS and psychometric properties of instruments measuring PAS were assessed following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality appraisal checklist and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-three studies were included, describing 60 outcomes of PAS, 79 factors influencing PAS and 21 instruments measuring PAS. In general, positive PAS was related to positive outcomes for the patient, nurse and organisation, supporting the relevance of PAS as a staffing measure. We identified a variety of factors that influence PAS, including demand for care, nurse supply and organisation of care delivery. Associations between these factors and PAS were inconsistent. The quality of studies investigating the development and evaluation of instruments measuring PAS was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the PAS may enhance nurse staffing methods in a hospital setting. Further work is needed to refine and psychometrically evaluate instruments for measuring PAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80618172021-05-11 Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review van der Mark, Carmen J E M Vermeulen, Hester Hendriks, Paul H J van Oostveen, Catharina J BMJ Open Nursing BACKGROUND: Matching demand and supply in nursing work continues to generate debate. Current approaches focus on objective measures, such as nurses per occupied bed or patient classification. However, staff numbers do not tell the whole staffing story. The subjective measure of nurses’ perceived adequacy of staffing (PAS) has the potential to enhance nurse staffing methods in a way that goes beyond traditional workload measurement or workforce planning methods. OBJECTIVES: To detect outcomes associated with nurses’ PAS and the factors that influence PAS and to review the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure PAS in a hospital setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review was performed to identify outcomes associated with PAS, factors influencing PAS and instruments measuring PAS. A search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Business Source Complete and Embase databases identified 2609 potentially relevant articles. Data were independently extracted, analysed and synthesised. The quality of studies describing influencing factors or outcomes of PAS and psychometric properties of instruments measuring PAS were assessed following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality appraisal checklist and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-three studies were included, describing 60 outcomes of PAS, 79 factors influencing PAS and 21 instruments measuring PAS. In general, positive PAS was related to positive outcomes for the patient, nurse and organisation, supporting the relevance of PAS as a staffing measure. We identified a variety of factors that influence PAS, including demand for care, nurse supply and organisation of care delivery. Associations between these factors and PAS were inconsistent. The quality of studies investigating the development and evaluation of instruments measuring PAS was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the PAS may enhance nurse staffing methods in a hospital setting. Further work is needed to refine and psychometrically evaluate instruments for measuring PAS. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8061817/ /pubmed/33879488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045245 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
van der Mark, Carmen J E M
Vermeulen, Hester
Hendriks, Paul H J
van Oostveen, Catharina J
Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
title Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
title_full Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
title_fullStr Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
title_short Measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
title_sort measuring perceived adequacy of staffing to incorporate nurses’ judgement into hospital capacity management: a scoping review
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045245
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermarkcarmenjem measuringperceivedadequacyofstaffingtoincorporatenursesjudgementintohospitalcapacitymanagementascopingreview
AT vermeulenhester measuringperceivedadequacyofstaffingtoincorporatenursesjudgementintohospitalcapacitymanagementascopingreview
AT hendrikspaulhj measuringperceivedadequacyofstaffingtoincorporatenursesjudgementintohospitalcapacitymanagementascopingreview
AT vanoostveencatharinaj measuringperceivedadequacyofstaffingtoincorporatenursesjudgementintohospitalcapacitymanagementascopingreview